Audit 379539

FY End
2025-09-30
Total Expended
$1.24M
Findings
1
Programs
2
Organization: Nolan County, Texas (TX)
Year: 2025 Accepted: 2026-01-06

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
1167953 2025-001 Material Weakness Yes I

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
21.027 CORONAVIRUS STATE AND LOCAL FISCAL RECOVERY FUNDS $1.20M Yes 1
16.738 EDWARD BYRNE MEMORIAL JUSTICE ASSISTANCE GRANT PROGRAM $48,950 Yes 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
K4WYN62N92R1 Heidi Harris Auditee
3252355857 Stacey McGee Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

reconciliation of the intergovernmental revenue and total awards. See the notes to the SEFA for the Table

Finding Details

Condition: The County did not have a formally adopted written policy, or documented procedures governing its procurement processes. Criteria: Federal and state laws, regulations, and sound business practices require entities to maintain internal controls over procurement. Specifically, Government Accountability Office (GAO) guidance and the Green Book, Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government, emphasize the need for documenting internal controls, including those related to acquisition processes, to ensure that transactions are executed in accordance with management's directives and applicable laws. Cause: Management did not prioritize the formal development and adoption of a procurement policy. This way primarily due to a lack of awareness regarding the internal control risks associated with undocumented procurement procedures and the assumption that existing informal practices were sufficient. Effect: Without a written procurement policy, the entity is exposed to significant risks of fraud, waste, and abuse. This condition could lead to (1) Noncompliance with regulations: Inconsistent or undocumented procurement actions may not meet the requirements of federal or state grants, potentially leading to questioned costs or the return of funds.; (2) Inefficient use of resources: The absence of a competitive process, such as soliciting multiple bids, can result in higher costs for goods and services; (3) Increased risk of fraud: Weak internal controls over purchasing increase the risk of fraudulent activities, such as collusion, kickbacks, or purchasing from unapproved vendors; (4) Reduced accountability: The lack of documentation prevents a clear audit trail, making it difficult to hold staff accountable for procurement decisions. Recommendation: We recommend that management immediately develop and formally adopt a comprehensive procurement policy and procedures manual. The manual, at a minimum, should include: (1) clear guidelines for soliciting bids and proposals, including requirements for full and open competition; (2) Documentation standards for all procurement actions, including vendor selection rationale and price comparisons; (3) Approval authority levels for different procurement thresholds, and (4) A process for monitoring compliance with the new policy. Management's Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management will draft a policy related to its procurement and will take it to the county commissioners for approval.