Audit 379422

FY End
2024-12-31
Total Expended
$792,107
Findings
6
Programs
7
Year: 2024 Accepted: 2026-01-06

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
1167906 2024-002 Material Weakness Yes I
1167907 2024-003 Material Weakness Yes I
1167908 2024-004 Material Weakness Yes P
1167909 2024-002 Material Weakness Yes I
1167910 2024-003 Material Weakness Yes I
1167911 2024-004 Material Weakness Yes P

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
10.924 CONSERVATION STEWARDSHIP PROGRAM $250,985 Yes 3
15.631 PARTNERS FOR FISH AND WILDLIFE $171,370 Yes 0
10.069 CONSERVATION RESERVE PROGRAM $84,867 Yes 0
10.902 SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION $81,616 Yes 3
10.932 REGIONAL CONSERVATION PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM $70,204 Yes 0
15.663 NFWF-USFWS CONSERVATION PARTNERSHIP $67,344 Yes 0
10.912 ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY INCENTIVES PROGRAM $65,721 Yes 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
K331D5P63GD1 Bruce Wells Auditee
6204377613 Jacob Kujath Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (the Schedule) presents the activity of all federal financial assistance programs for the Kansas Grazing Lands Coalition (the Organization). The reporting Organization is defined in Note 1 of the Organization’s basic financial statement. Federal financial assistance received directly from federal agencies as well as federal financial assistance passed through other government agencies are included on the Schedule.
The accompanying Schedule is presented on a basis which is the same basis of accounting as the financial statement. The information in the Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the Organization, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net assets, or cash flows of the Organization. The Organization has elected to use the 10% de minimis cost rate.

Finding Details

Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR Section 200.319(c) the Organization must have written procedures for procurement transactions. Condition: The Organization does not have a written procurement policy as required by the Uniform Guidance. Context: During the audit it was noted that the Organization lacked a documented procurement policy. Cause: The Organization did not have an adequate procurement policy Questioned Costs: None Effect: An important component of internal controls and compliance is the existence of operating policies and procedures. Without those, there is a higher risk of noncompliance with program requirements. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: Management should determine the scope of written policies and procedures to comply with the Uniform Guidance. Views of Responsible Officials (unaudited): The Organization agrees with the finding and recommendation. The Board of Directors of the Organization will develop policies and procedures to ensure they meet the Uniform Guidance Requirements.
Criteria: The Uniform Guidance (2 CFR 200.213) requires non-federal entities to ensure that federal funds are not awarded to or expended with parties that are suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. This requirement can be satisfied by obtaining a vendor certification or by checking the SAM.gov system prior to entering into covered transaction. Condition: We noted that the Organization did not perform or document required suspension and debarment checks for certain vendors and contractors paid with federal funds. The Organization did not obtain or retain evidence, such as a certification from the vendor or verification from the System for Award Management (SAM), to ensure the vendors were not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from federal programs. Context: The Organization did not perform the suspension and debarment check. Cause: The Organization did not have an adequate procedures in place to ensure that suspension and debarment checks were consistently performed and documented. Questioned Costs: None Effect: Without performing suspension and debarment checks, the Organization risks expending federal funds on ineligible vendors, which could result in questioned costs and potential repayment of federal funds. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization implement procedures to ensure suspension and debarment check are performed for all covered transactions and that evidence of such checks is retained in the procurrent files. Views of Responsible Officials (unaudited): The Organization agrees with the finding and recommendation. The Board of Directors of the Organization will develop policies and procedures to ensure they meet the Uniform Guidance Requirements.
Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR Section 200.517(c) the Organization must keep and make audit documentation available for review. Condition: The Organization does not have all supporting documentation requested as required by the Uniform Guidance. Context: During the audit it was noted that the Organization lacked supporting documentation. The Organization did not have documentation for the 23 out of 35 tested samples. Cause: The Organization did not have adequate supporting documentation. Questioned Costs: None Effect: The absence of required documentation may result in noncompliance with program requirements and expose the Organization to reputational risks. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that management reinforce training for all relevant documentation requirements. Procedures should be strengthened to ensure that all files include complete and accurate documentation. Views of Responsible Officials (unaudited): The Organization will develop a procurement and payment procedure to ensure all proper supporting documentation is obtained prior to the check disbursement.