Audit 378543

FY End
2025-06-30
Total Expended
$840,299
Findings
1
Programs
2
Organization: Dima Ii, Inc. (DE)
Year: 2025 Accepted: 2025-12-31

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
1167492 2025-001 Material Weakness Yes P

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
14.181 SUPPORTIVE HOUSING FOR PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES $773,200 Yes 1
14.195 PROJECT-BASED RENTAL ASSISTANCE (PBRA) $67,099 Yes 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
N5MQNWBP6QS7 Edna Kpota Auditee
3024270787 Rick Tull Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

HUD awarded DIMA II, Inc. a mortgage of $773,200 under Section 811 of the National Affordable Housing Act for acquisition and rehabilitation of the Project. A mortgage modification agreement was entered into on March 11, 1993, which modified the maximum mortgage commitment to $923,600. The mortgage is deemed a contingent liability since no interest or principal payments are payable or due. The mortgage note does not become due unless HUD operating and filing requirements, as defined under Section 811 of the National Affordable Housing Act, are not met, in which case the entire mortgage balance becomes due, including interest accrued at 6.625% per annum. DIMA II, Inc. must continue to operate the project under HUD guidelines until March 11, 2033, before the note will be forgiven. Although the capital advance is fully forgivable if certain compliance requirements are met, the Project accounts for this obligation as debt in the financial statements. Because repayment is not expected to occur if the requirements are satisfied, no interest is imputed on the noninterest-bearing advance. The liability will remain until the conditions for forgiveness have been substantially met.
Rental assistance is provided to eligible tenants under a housing assistance payment contract administered by HUD. This contract requires tenants to contribute a portion of the rent based on their income, and the difference between the tenant’s payment and the full contract rent is subsidized by HUD. In 2025, the Project earned a total of $67,099 from HUD’s Section 8 Project-Based Rental Assistance Program.

Finding Details

Criteria: Accurate financial reporting and compliance with the Uniform Guidance require a strong internal control system. This includes proper segregation of duties, consistent application of documented policies and procedures, and routine management oversight. Under 2 CFR 200.303, non-federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the entity is managing the awards in compliance with the applicable requirements. Controls should be documented sufficiently to allow management to monitor their effectiveness and to demonstrate compliance to external parties. Criteria: Accurate financial reporting and compliance with the Uniform Guidance require a strong internal control system. This includes proper segregation of duties, consistent application of documented policies and procedures, and routine management oversight. Under 2 CFR 200.303, non-federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the entity is managing the awards in compliance with the applicable requirements. Controls should be documented sufficiently to allow management to monitor their effectiveness and to demonstrate compliance to external parties. Condition: During the year, the former Senior Director of Housing & Facilities was responsible for the custody of assets and for authorizing and recording transactions in the Project’s accounting software, with limited routine oversight. Evidence of mitigating controls, such as supervisory review, documented by management approvals or signoffs, was not maintained. Cause: Staffing constraints and employee turnover have contributed to the current control environment’s inadequate segregation of duties and a lack of documented management oversight. Effect: This concentration of incompatible duties in a single individual, without documented oversight, increases the risk that errors or irregularities may occur and remain undetected. When control activities rely on a single individual’s institutional knowledge rather than documented procedures and effective internal controls, continuity and compliance can be difficult to maintain during periods of staff transition. Recommendations: Management should review existing policies and procedures and improve them where necessary to address gaps in the current control structure. Roles and responsibilities should be clearly defined and documented for all key financial reporting and compliance functions. Controls and mitigating controls should be designed, implemented, and documented, with particular attention given to segregation of duties and oversight. Evidence of supervisory review should be maintained routinely through sign-offs, checklists, or review logs. Staff involved in financial reporting and compliance should be familiar with applicable HUD requirements, the Uniform Guidance, and the entity's own policies to ensure ongoing adherence to federal program requirements. Management Comments: We concur with this finding and recognize the need for a more robust control environment. We are actively working to reevaluate staff responsibilities, expand the documentation of oversight procedures, and implement structured, recurring reviews of financial transactions and compliance-related data to ensure compliance with the Uniform Guidance.