Audit 378323

FY End
2025-03-31
Total Expended
$50.57M
Findings
4
Programs
10
Year: 2025 Accepted: 2025-12-30

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
1167288 2025-001 Material Weakness Yes E
1167289 2025-002 Material Weakness Yes E
1167290 2025-001 Material Weakness Yes E
1167291 2025-001 Material Weakness Yes E

Contacts

Name Title Type
K3THGG24Z673 Sieglinde Cambliss Auditee
2393443224 Laura Anne Pray Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards and local assistance includes federal and state grant activity of the Housing Authority of the City of Fort Myers, Florida and is presented on the accrual basis of accounting. The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards ("Uniform Guidance"). Therefore, some amounts presented in this schedule may differ from amounts presented in, or used in the preparation of, the basic financial statements. In accordance with HUD regulations, HUD considers the Annual Budget Authority for the Housing Choice Voucher Program, AL No. 14.871, to be considered an expenditure for the purposes of this schedule. Therefore, the amount in this schedule is the total amount received directly from HUD.
The Authority did not elect to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate.
During the year ended March 31, 2025, the Authority had no sub-recipients.
The Authority did not receive any noncash assistance, federal loans, or federally funded insurance during the year ended March 31, 2025.

Finding Details

Eligibility Public and Indian Housing Program - AL No. 14.850 Material Weakness in Internal Control Material Noncompliance Condition: Out of an approximate population of 600 tenants, a total of 6 tenant files were selected for testing and the following deficiencies were noted: • Six files had an annual recertification completed over 12 months after the previous recertification, • One file was missing an annual inspection, and • One file was missing a QC checklist. Criteria: The Authority’s ACOP and 24 CFR 960.259 requires internal controls to be in place to ensure proper procedures are being followed in compliance with HUD requirements regarding complete and accurate tenant files. Context: The auditor haphazardly selected 6 tenant files out of the population, which is considered to be a statistically valid sample. The auditor reviewed the tenant files and support to ensure that proper procedure are being followed and that the Authority is in compliance with HUD requirements regarding timely, complete, and accurate tenant files. Cause: The Authority continued to experience staffing turnover and did not have the available staff to fully implement the established internal controls to ensure proper compliance with regards to timely recertifications and collection of required HUD documentation to complete the tenant files. Effect: The Authority is not in full compliance with HUD requirements regarding eligibility which could result in the incorrect amount of rental assistance provided. Questioned Costs: None. Auditor Recommendations: The Authority should continue to train staff on the established procedures and controls in place to ensure full compliance in regard to eligibility. The Authority needs to correct the deficiencies noted in the tested files and consider the impact to the rest of the population of tenant files that were not selected as part of the auditor’s sample. Management Response: See Corrective Action Plan.
Eligibility Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers Program - AL No. 14.871 Material Weakness in Internal Control Material Noncompliance Condition: Out of an approximate population of 2,200 tenants, a total of 37 tenant files were selected for testing and the following deficiencies were noted: • Thirteen files were missing rent reasonableness documentation, • Eleven files were missing 214 forms, • Eleven files were missing income support or had an income calculation error, • Eleven files were missing recertifications that agreed to the rent roll month tested, • Eight files were missing annual inspections, • Eight files had incorrect utility allowances, • Six files did not have a valid 9886 release of information form within 15 months of the annual recertification, • Five files were missing identification for tenants, • Four files had the incorrect payment standards used, and • One file had an annual recertification completed over 12 months after the previous recertification. Criteria: The Authority’s administrative plan and 24 CFR 982.516 requires internal controls to be in place to ensure proper procedures are being followed in compliance with HUD requirements regarding complete and accurate tenant files. Context: The auditor haphazardly selected 37 tenant files out of the population, which is considered to be a statistically valid sample. The auditor reviewed the tenant files and support to ensure that proper procedures are being followed and that the Authority is in compliance with HUD requirements regarding timely, complete, and accurate tenant files. Cause: The Authority experienced staffing turnover and did not have the available staff to fully implement the established internal controls to ensure proper compliance with regards to timely recertifications and collection of required HUD documentation to complete the tenant files. Additionally, the implementation of online certifications and transitioning to paperless recordkeeping contributed to inconsistent electronic files being maintained. Effect: The Authority is not in full compliance with HUD requirements regarding eligibility which could result in the incorrect amount of rental assistance provided. Questioned Costs: None. Auditor Recommendations: The Authority should continue to train staff on the established procedures and controls in place to ensure full compliance in regard to eligibility. The Authority needs to correct the deficiencies noted in the tested files and consider the impact to the rest of the population of tenant files that were not selected as part of the auditor’s sample. Management Response: See Corrective Action Plan.