Audit 377931

FY End
2025-06-30
Total Expended
$70.51M
Findings
2
Programs
22
Year: 2025 Accepted: 2025-12-29
Auditor: NIGRO & NIGRO PC

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
1166814 2025-001 Material Weakness Yes N
1166815 2025-001 Material Weakness Yes N

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
93.600 HEAD START $3.66M Yes 0
10.555 NATIONAL SCHOOL LUNCH PROGRAM $2.17M Yes 0
84.367 SUPPORTING EFFECTIVE INSTRUCTION STATE GRANTS (FORMERLY IMPROVING TEACHER QUALITY STATE GRANTS) $1.40M Yes 0
84.424 STUDENT SUPPORT AND ACADEMIC ENRICHMENT PROGRAM $1.25M Yes 0
84.365 ENGLISH LANGUAGE ACQUISITION STATE GRANTS $1.18M Yes 0
84.010 TITLE I GRANTS TO LOCAL EDUCATIONAL AGENCIES $947,157 Yes 1
93.566 REFUGEE AND ENTRANT ASSISTANCE STATE/REPLACEMENT DESIGNEE ADMINISTERED PROGRAMS $928,039 Yes 0
10.582 FRESH FRUIT AND VEGETABLE PROGRAM $571,195 Yes 0
84.027 SPECIAL EDUCATION GRANTS TO STATES $368,685 Yes 0
10.559 SUMMER FOOD SERVICE PROGRAM FOR CHILDREN $334,497 Yes 0
84.287 TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY COMMUNITY LEARNING CENTERS $306,429 Yes 0
10.558 CHILD AND ADULT CARE FOOD PROGRAM $256,668 Yes 0
84.196 EDUCATION FOR HOMELESS CHILDREN AND YOUTH $179,059 Yes 0
93.596 CHILD CARE MANDATORY AND MATCHING FUNDS OF THE CHILD CARE AND DEVELOPMENT FUND $145,425 Yes 0
84.425 EDUCATION STABILIZATION FUND $112,401 Yes 0
93.575 CHILD CARE AND DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT $60,552 Yes 0
84.181 SPECIAL EDUCATION-GRANTS FOR INFANTS AND FAMILIES $55,632 Yes 0
93.674 JOHN H. CHAFEE FOSTER CARE PROGRAM FOR SUCCESSFUL TRANSITION TO ADULTHOOD $50,000 Yes 0
10.553 SCHOOL BREAKFAST PROGRAM $39,908 Yes 0
84.002 ADULT EDUCATION - BASIC GRANTS TO STATES $23,254 Yes 0
84.060 INDIAN EDUCATION GRANTS TO LOCAL EDUCATIONAL AGENCIES $19,477 Yes 0
84.173 SPECIAL EDUCATION PRESCHOOL GRANTS $1,819 Yes 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
K5N3ULCEEMU8 Kate Ingersoll Auditee
9165661702 Jeff Nigro Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

The schedule of expenditures of Federal awards includes the Federal grant activity of the District and is presented on the modified accrual basis of accounting. The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of the Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards. Therefore, some amounts presented in this schedule may differ from amounts presented in or used in the preparation of the financial statements. The District did not elect to use the ten percent de minimis indirect cost rate. The following schedule provides a reconciliation between revenues reported on the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance and the related expenditures reported on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards.

Finding Details

Repeat Finding? No Program Identification: Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass‐through Entity: California Department of Education Program Names: Title I, Part A Grants: Title I, Part A, Basic Grants Local-Income and Neglected (AL No. 84.010) ESEA, School Improvement Grant Funding for LEAs (AL No. 84.010) Criteria: ESEA sections 1111(h)(1)(C)(iii)(II) and 8101(23), (25) (20 USC 6311(h)(1)(C)(iii)(II) and 7801(23), (25))) require a local educational agency to have official written documentation that a student enrolled in another school or in a educational program that culminates in the award of a regular high school diploma in order to remove a student from the graduation cohort. A student who is retained in grade, enrolled in a GED program, or leaves school for any other reason may not be counted as having transferred out for the purpose of calculating graduation rate and must remain in the adjusted cohort. Condition: During our testing of compliance and controls over the graduation cohort, we identified two instances in which the District was unable to provide supporting documentation to demonstrate that the students enrolled in another school or in a educational program that culminates in the award of a regular high school diploma. Context: Exceptions were noted in two out of the fourteen pupils sampled. Questioned Costs: None. Cause: Lack of review process to ensure that when a student is removed from the graduation cohort proper documentation is obtained and maintained to support the student’s removal from the graduation cohort. Effect: School sites’ graduation rate will be overstated on the school sites’ annual report cards. Recommendation: We recommend the District train school site staff on allowable documentation to remove students from a graduation cohort as well as other cohort codes. Subsequently, the District should assist school sites in developing the record retention process to ensure documentation is available upon request. Views of Responsible Officials: Annual training is provided to the school office staff at the August enrollment and attendance meeting. Due to this finding, additional reminder training was provided to all school office staff on December 4th and 5th 2025. The policies and procedures related to the training are on a share drive to be accessed at any time.