Audit 377149

FY End
2024-12-31
Total Expended
$4.45M
Findings
1
Programs
3
Organization: El Dorado Irrigation District (CA)
Year: 2024 Accepted: 2025-12-22

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
1166204 2024-001 Material Weakness Yes L

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
97.039 HAZARD MITIGATION GRANT $3.72M Yes 1
97.036 DISASTER GRANTS - PUBLIC ASSISTANCE (PRESIDENTIALLY DECLARED DISASTERS) $663,748 Yes 0
97.047 BRIC: BUILDING RESILIENT INFRASTRUCTURE AND COMMUNITIES $72,284 Yes 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
MDSQGH8NTC51 Penny Buchman Auditee
5306424139 Ahmed Badawi Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

The financial reporting entity consists of (a) the primary government, El Dorado Irrigation District, California (District), (b) organizations for which the primary government is financially accountable, and (c) other organizations for which the primary government is not accountable, but for which the nature and significance of their relationship with the primary government are such that exclusion would cause the reporting entity's financial statements to be misleading or incomplete.
Funds received under the various grant programs have been recorded within the enterprise funds of the District. The District utilizes the full accrual basis of accounting for the enterprise funds. Expenses of federal awards reported on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (Schedule) are recognized when incurred.
The accompanying Schedule presents the activity of all federal financial assistance programs of the District. Federal financial assistance received directly from federal agencies as well as federal financial assistance passed through the State of California is included in the Schedule. The Schedule was prepared only from the accounts of various grant programs and, therefore, does not present the financial position or results of operations of the District.
When federal awards were received from a pass-through entity, the Schedule shows, if available, the identifying number assigned by the pass-through entity. When no identifying number is shown, the District determined that no identifying number is assigned for the program, or the District was unable to obtain an identifying number from the pass-through entity.
The District did not elect to use indirect costs.

Finding Details

SA2024-001: Discrepancy in Expenses Reported to Cal-OES– Significant Deficiency AL number: 97.039 AL Title: Hazard Mitigation Grant Name of Federal Agency: Department of Homeland Security Criteria The District is responsible for a timely and accurate reporting of eligible grant expenses. Condition During the performance of the audit, we noted that District‘s reported expenses to Cal-OES exceeded the actual expenses by $484,041. Cause The District’s incorrectly recorded duplicate expenditures entries resulting in overstatement of reported expenditures. Questioned Costs: We question all costs noted above in the total amount of $484,041. Effect Because of overstatement of expenses, District received federal funds for which it was not entitled in addition to non-compliance of grant terms and uniform guidance reporting compliance requirements. Recommendation We recommend that the District simplify its structure of accounting records and properly review reports before submission. Management Response The duplicate reporting of costs occurred during a time when the District was transitioning grant financial reporting from the engineering department to the finance department. At the same time as this transition, the role assigned to grant financial reporting experienced turnover which required temporary workload redistribution. Because multiple employees across different departments were assisting with grant reporting during this period, there was an increased opportunity for error, and expenditures that had already been reported were inadvertently captured again on a later reimbursement request. Responsibility for financial expenditure reporting has now been formally transitioned to the Finance Department. This change minimizes errors in expenditure reporting due to Finance staff’s specialized knowledge of the financial system, and their experience in researching variances and verifying financial data. Engineering staff remain the program specialists and continue to provide programmatic narrative, technical context, and compliance reporting. This restructuring also centralizes financial reporting, and allows Finance to export data directly from the financial system rather than relying on a reporting tool that summarizes information separately. Additionally, after Engineering completes its programmatic review, the Finance Manager and the Finance Director provides review and approval of all grant-related financial reporting. This added layer of review and approval, ensures that all data is verified by multiple parties and accurately reported.