Audit 375972

FY End
2025-06-30
Total Expended
$7.04M
Findings
2
Programs
11
Organization: Bonita Unified School District (CA)
Year: 2025 Accepted: 2025-12-18
Auditor: NIGRO & NIGRO PC

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
1165370 2025-001 Material Weakness Yes N
1165371 2025-001 Material Weakness Yes N

Contacts

Name Title Type
J7AUXRHEFWJ4 Sonia Eckley Auditee
9099718200 Jessica Miller Auditor
No contacts on file

Finding Details

Finding 2025-001: Annual Report Card, High School Graduation Rate (50000) Repeat Finding? No Program Identification: Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass‐through Entity: California Department of Education (pass-through numbers 14329, 15438) Program Names: Title I, Part A Grants: Title I, Part A, Basic Grants Local-Income and Neglected (AL No. 84.010) ESEA, School Improvement Grant Funding for LEAs (AL No. 84.010) Criteria: ESEA sections 1111(h)(1)(C)(iii)(II) and 8101(23), (25) (20 USC 6311(h)(1)(C)(iii)(II) and 7801(23), (25))) require a local educational agency to have official written documentation that a student enrolled in another school or in a educational program that culminates in the award of a regular high school diploma in order to remove a student from the graduation cohort. A student who is retained in grade, enrolled in a GED program, or leaves school for any other reason may not be counted has having transferred out for the purpose of calculating graduation rate and must remain in the adjusted cohort. Condition: During our testing of compliance and controls over the graduation cohort, we identified one instance in which the District was unable to provide supporting documentation to demonstrate that the student enrolled in another school or in a educational program that culminates in the award of a regular high school diploma. Context: Exceptions were noted in one out of the five pupils sampled. Questioned Costs: None. Cause: Lack of review process to ensure that when a student is removed from the graduation cohort proper documentation is obtained and maintained to support the student’s removal from the graduation cohort. Effect: School sites’ graduation rate may be overstated on the school sites’ annual report cards. Recommendation: We recommend the District train school site staff on allowable documentation to remove students from a graduation cohort as well as other cohort codes. Subsequently, the District should assist school sites in developing the record retention process to ensure documentation is available upon request. Views of Responsible Officials: The Student Services office has worked with the Registrars at the high schools to ensure that a process is followed for record retention and that the graduation cohort data is accurate when students exit that graduation cohort.