Audit 375578

FY End
2025-03-31
Total Expended
$72.19M
Findings
1
Programs
6
Year: 2025 Accepted: 2025-12-17

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
1165228 2025-001 Material Weakness Yes N

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
14.881 MOVING TO WORK DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM $63.00M Yes 1
14.871 SECTION 8 HOUSING CHOICE VOUCHERS $4.42M Yes 0
14.871 EMERGENCY HOUSING VOUCHER $2.22M Yes 0
14.195 PROJECT-BASED RENTAL ASSISTANCE (PBRA) $1.49M Yes 0
14.879 MAINSTREAM VOUCHERS $915,974 Yes 0
14.896 FAMILY SELF-SUFFICIENCY PROGRAM $146,484 Yes 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
MW1GLT66TTJ6 Dale Jones Auditee
5616558530 Mandy Merchant Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

The Authority received $4,424,475 in federal funding for the Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program (ALN 14.871), $915,974 for Mainstream (ALN 14.879), and $2,219,651 for Emergency Housing Voucher (ALN 14.871) during the year. The Authority reported $4,424,475, $913,699, and $2,198,072 in expenditures on a full accrual basis for the Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program, Mainstream, and Emergency Housing Voucher, respectively, during the year, which were paid with federal and nonfederal funds.
The Authority received $62,998,038 in federal funding for the Moving to Work Program (ALN 14.881) which is comprised of Demonstration Program for Low Rent, Capital Fund, and HCV Program during the year. The Authority reported $61,058,579 in expenditures on a full accrual basis for the Moving to Work Program during the year. Expenses were paid for by current year HUD funding, tenant rent, other sources of revenue, and prior year reserves.

Finding Details

Federal Agency: Housing and Urban Development Federal Program Name: Moving to Work Demonstration Program Assistance Listing Number: 14.881 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: FL009, 2025 Award Period: April 1, 2024 to March 31, 2025 Type of Finding: - Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance, Other Matters Criteria or Specific Requirement: Beneficiaries must be “low-income families,” as defined in Section 3(b)(2) of the 1937 Housing Act (42 USC 1437a(b)(2)) (Section 204(b) of Pub. L. No. 104-134 (42 USC 1437f (note))). MTW agencies are required to establish a reasonable rent policy, which shall be designed to encourage employment and self-sufficiency by participating families, consistent with the purpose of this demonstration, such as by excluding some or all of a family’s earned income for purposes of determining rent. The rent policy must be in the Annual MTW Plan and Reports (Section 204(c)(3)(B) of Pub.L. No. 104-134 (42 USC 1437f (note))) or the MTW Supplement. Per the Authority's administrative plan only family’s reporting zero income are required to report an increase in income via an interim reexamination. If the family share of the rent is to increase: The increase generally will be effective on the first of the month following 30 days’ notice to the family. Additionally, per the Authority's administrative plan, except in the case of certain LIHT and HOMEassisted units, no HAP contract can be approved until the PHA has determined that the rent for the unit is reasonable. The purpose of the rent reasonableness test is to ensure that a fair rent is paid for each unit rented under the HCV program. Condition: During the testing of the Moving to Work Demonstration Program tenant files, certain eligibility compliance deficiencies were noted. Of the tenant files provided, auditor noted the following item: - 2 instances where a rent reasonableness was not performed for the contract rent reported on the HUD-50058. - 1 instances where an interim re-examination was not completed for an increase in the tenant's income. Questioned Costs: $4,239 Context: Out of 40 files, 3 files contained errors as noted above. Cause: The Authority failed to perform rent reasonableness and complete interim re-examinations to ensure compliance with HUD rules and regulations, as well as their administrative policy. Effect: The Authority does not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that rent reasonableness and recertifications are properly completed. Repeat Finding: Yes, 2024-001. Recommendation: We recommend management should designate one person to ensure that rent reasonableness and recertifications have been completed timely and as needed in accordance with HUD and the Authority's administrative plan. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.