Audit 375523

FY End
2025-06-30
Total Expended
$1.51M
Findings
8
Programs
12
Year: 2025 Accepted: 2025-12-17
Auditor: NIGRO & NIGRO PC

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
1165214 2025-002 Material Weakness Yes I
1165215 2025-003 Material Weakness Yes L
1165216 2025-002 Material Weakness Yes I
1165217 2025-003 Material Weakness Yes L
1165218 2025-002 Material Weakness Yes I
1165219 2025-003 Material Weakness Yes L
1165220 2025-002 Material Weakness Yes I
1165221 2025-003 Material Weakness Yes L

Contacts

Name Title Type
JG2BNCVTWPJ8 Leigh Kreienhop Auditee
7078953774 Jessica Miller Auditor
No contacts on file

Finding Details

Finding 2025-002: Procurement (50000) Assistance Listing # 10.553, 10.555 U.S. Department of Agriculture Passed Through: California Department of Education (pass through numbers 13526, 13523, 13391, 15655) Child Nutrition Cluster Repeat Finding? No Criteria: Code of Federal Regulations, CFR 200.320, requires the non-Federal entity to have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. For “small purchases,” those where the aggregate dollar amount is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). Condition: During our testing of procurement, we sampled two contracts that would qualify as “small purchases.” The district could not provide evidence that multiple quotes had been obtained prior to selecting the vendors. Cause: Due to turnover at the District, there has been a lack of oversight to ensure all appropriate documentation is maintained to demonstrate that the District is in compliance with Public Contract Code and that purchases are awarded after a reasonable number of quotes have been obtained. Context: Deficiency was noted in two of two vendors tested. Questioned Cost/Effect: This resulted in roughly $138,594 dollars awarded in contracts, without following proper procedures. Recommendation: We recommend that the District train and implement the required federal procurement procedures to ensure that the District is in compliance. Views of Responsible Officials: The District corrected this procedure for fiscal year 2025-26 and has the process in place going forward for each fiscal year.
Finding 2025-003: Reporting (50000) Assistance Listing # 10.553, 10.555 U.S. Department of Agriculture Passed Through: California Department of Education (pass through numbers 13526, 13523, 13391, 15655) Child Nutrition Cluster Repeat Finding? No Criteria: Code of Federal Regulations, 7 CFR sections 210.8, 220.11, 215.10, and 225.15(c), require the non-Federal entity to submit monthly claims for reimbursement for meals and snacks served to eligible students within 60 days following the last day of the month covered by the claim. Each month’s claim for reimbursement and all data used in the claims review process must be maintained on file. Accurate records must be maintained justifying all meals claimed and documenting that all Program funds were spent only on allowable Child Nutrition Program costs. Condition: During our testing of reporting, we sampled two months of submitted claims for reimbursement and traced meals served to backup documentation. We noted the District uses a point of sale (POS) system to track meals served and an excel spreadsheet to reconcile actual meals served to the POS report. The submitted claims are based on the numbers reported on excel spreadsheet reconciliation and the District was unable to provide support for the differences between the POS report and the spreadsheet. Cause: Due to turnover at the District, there has been a lack of oversight to ensure all appropriate documentation is maintained to demonstrate accuracy of the submitted reports. Context: Deficiency was noted in two of two months tested. Questioned Cost/Effect: This resulted in roughly $187 dollars questioned cost. Recommendation: We recommend that the District train and implement procedures to ensure that the District is reporting accurate claim numbers. Views of Responsible Officials: The cafeteria manager will reconcile meals served monthly to verify that the numbers match and are verified to actual meals served.