Audit 374364

FY End
2025-09-30
Total Expended
$1.14M
Findings
0
Programs
2
Year: 2025 Accepted: 2025-12-12
Auditor: BONADIO & CO LLP

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

No findings recorded

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
93.092 AFFORDABLE CARE ACT (ACA) PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY EDUCATION PROGRAM $697,988 Yes 0
93.060 SEXUAL RISK AVOIDANCE EDUCATION $445,345 Yes 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
Z7CVBFEG5L78 Derinda Stewart Auditee
4698580055 Mark Perez Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the Schedule) includes expenditures of federal programs received directly from federal agencies, as well as any federal assistance passed through other organizations. Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Amounts included in the Schedule are actual expenditures for the year ended September 30, 2025. Differences between amounts included in the Schedule and amounts reported to funding agencies for these programs result from report timing.
The Schedule includes the federal award activity of Creative Visions Social Services & Consultants, Inc. (the Organization) under programs of the federal government for the year ended September 30, 2025 and has been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The information in the Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the Organization, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, change in net assets, or cash flows of the Organization.
The Organization did not elect to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under Uniform Guidance.