NOTE 3 - LOANS RECEIVABLE OUTSTANDING The City has loans receivable outstanding under Assistance Listing #14.218 CDBG Entitlement Grants of $47,579 and under Assistance Listing #14.239 Home Investment Partnership Grants of $91,613 at April 30, 2025.
NOTE 4 - FUNDS PROVIDED TO SUBRECIPIENTS Of the Federal expenditures presented on this schedule, the City provided $48,867 through the Community Development Block Grants to sub recipients.
NOTE 5 - RELATIONSHIP OF THE SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES OF FEDERAL AWARDS TO THE PRIMARY GOVERNMENT FINANCIAL STATEMENTS The following reconciliation is provided to help the reader of the City's financial statements and supplementary information relate such information to the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards for the year ended April 30, 2025: Governmental Funds : Major funds : General Fund $201,708 Capital Infras tructure 729,176 Nonmajor s pecial revenue funds : Community Development Block Grant 773,509 Emergency Shelter 102,872 CDBG Home 476,663 Justice Assistance Grant 18,986 Intergovernmental Donations 1,069 HOME - ARPA 233,687 Lead Hazard Control Grant 181,104 Lead Hazard Reduction Grant 552,562 EPA Browns field Candy Co Grant 8 ,954 Healthy Homes Production Grant 13,680 Nonmajor capital project funds : Kansas Lane Connector 694,938 Capital Equipment Purchases 267,352 Kansas Lane Extension 4,470,563 Texas -Standifer Trunk Repair 5,960,516 Cooley House Preservation 59,125 Proprietary Funds : Major funds : Monroe Regional Airport 4,808,399 Nonmajor Enterpris e Funds : Monroe Transit System 2,616,605 Total $ 22,171,468
NOTE 6 - DISASTER GRANTS – PUBLIC ASSISTANCE, AL# 97.036 Non-Federal entities must recordexpenditures on the SEFA when (1) Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) has approved the nonfederal entity’s project worksheet (PW), and (2) the Non-Federal entity has incurred the eligible expenditures. In 2025, FEMA approved $313,080 of eligible expenditures that were incurred in a prior year and are included on the schedule.
NOTE 7 - DE MINIMIS INDIRECT COST RATE The City did not elect to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance.