Audit 373970

FY End
2025-06-30
Total Expended
$4.22M
Findings
2
Programs
12
Year: 2025 Accepted: 2025-12-11

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
1164452 2025-001 Material Weakness Yes I
1164453 2025-001 Material Weakness Yes I

Contacts

Name Title Type
EJJ7S1G3H5K7 Tina Burkholder Auditee
7632722015 Mary Reedy Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards presents the expenditures of all federal financial assistance programs of Independent School District No. 882 for the year ended June 30, 2025. The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the schedule presents only a select portion of the operations of the District, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position or changes in net position of the District.
% — The pass-through entity identifying number is unknown.
The total of Assistance Listing No. 10.555 is $1,104,683. The total of Assistance Listing No. 84.181 is $70,457.

Finding Details

Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Program Name: Special Education Assistance Listing Number: 84.027 and 84.173 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Unknown - 2025 Pass-Through Agency and Pass-Through Number: Minnesota Department of Education – H027A240087, H173A240086 Award Period: Year Ended June 30, 2025 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance and Other Matters Condition: The District did not retain documentation to support that the vendors used were not suspended or debarred. Criteria or specific requirement: Federal guidelines require grant recipients to perform verification procedures that a vendor is not federally suspended or debarred prior to entering into a covered transaction. Questioned Costs: None. The vendor was not federally suspended or debarred. Context: During suspension and debarment testing, it was noted that the vendor tested did not go through proper suspension and debarment procedures before the District made the payment. Effect: Lack of proper documentation of controls over compliance with suspension and debarment requirements could result in paying suspended or debarred vendors. This could ultimately result in questioned costs. After review of vendors, it was noted that no vendors used were on the suspension or debarment list. Cause: Oversight. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the District implement additional procedures to ensure suspension and debarment documentation is retained. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.