Audit 373624

FY End
2025-06-30
Total Expended
$1.12M
Findings
4
Programs
12
Year: 2025 Accepted: 2025-12-09

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
1164268 2025-004 Material Weakness Yes I
1164269 2025-004 Material Weakness Yes I
1164270 2025-004 Material Weakness Yes I
1164271 2025-004 Material Weakness Yes I

Contacts

Name Title Type
PA4CA1M25M23 Drew Olsonawski Auditee
3202391301 Mary Reedy Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards presents the expenditures of all federal financial assistance programs of Independent School District No. 2149 (the District) for the year ended June 30, 2025. The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the schedule presents only a select portion of the operations of the District, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position or changes in net position of the District.

Finding Details

Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Program Name: Child Nutrition Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 10.553, 10.582, and 10.555 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 1-2149-000, 2025 Pass-Through Agency: Minnesota Department of Education Pass-Through Number: 1-2149-000 Award Period: June 30, 2025 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or Specific Requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Award requires compliance with the provisions of procurement, suspension, and debarment. The District should have internal controls designed to ensure compliance with those provisions. Condition: During our testing, we noted that the District did not have adequate internal controls designed to ensure vendors were not suspended or debarred. Questioned costs: None Context: During our testing, it was noted that the District was not reviewing vendors prior to entering into a contract with a vendor to ensure the vendor was not on the suspended or debarred vendor list maintained by the General Services Administration. Cause: Lack of management oversight. Effect: The auditor noted no instances of noncompliance with the provisions of procurement, suspension, and debarment; however, the lack of internal controls over these compliance requirements provides an opportunity for noncompliance. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the District design controls to ensure an adequate review process is in place to review potential contractors to determine they are not suspended or debarred. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.