Audit 371135

FY End
2023-12-31
Total Expended
$2.52M
Findings
1
Programs
1
Year: 2023 Accepted: 2025-10-22
Auditor: CROWE LLP

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
1161132 2023-001 Material Weakness Yes I

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
21.027 CORONAVIRUS STATE AND LOCAL FISCAL RECOVERY FUNDS $2.52M Yes 1

Contacts

Name Title Type
RDQWALHYHMW7 Randy Cokl Auditee
2606092655 Scott Nickerson Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

A. Basis of Presentation The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (the “Schedule”) includes the federal grant activity of the Whitley County Regional Sewer District (the “District”) under programs of the federal government for the year ended December 31, 2023. The information in the Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a select portion of the operations of the District, it is not intended to and does not present the receipts, disbursements, and cash and investment balances – regulatory basis of the District. B. Other Significant Accounting Policies Expenditures reported on the SEFA are reported on the cash basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following, as applicable, either the cost principles in OMB Circular A-87, Cost Principles for State, Local, and Indian Tribal Governments, or the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowed or are limited as to reimbursement. When federal grants are received on a reimbursement basis, the federal awards are considered expended when the reimbursement is received.
The District has elected not to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance.
The District did not have any subrecipient activity for the year ended December 31, 2023.

Finding Details

Information on the federal program: Subject: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds – Internal Controls and Compliance Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Federal Program: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Finance Authority Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Noncompliance Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR section 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must use one of the following methods of procurement… (b) Simplified acquisition thresholds. The non-Federal entity is responsible for determining an appropriate simplified acquisition threshold based on internal controls, an evaluation of risk and its documented procurement procedures which must not exceed the threshold established in the FAR. When applicable, a lower simplified acquisition threshold used by the non-Federal entity must be authorized or not prohibited under State, local, or tribal laws or regulations. Entities must obtain price or rate quotations from an adequate number of qualified sources to ensure full and open competition. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.214 and the government-wide requirements in 2 CFR Part 180, non-Federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards to parties that are suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from federal programs. This requirement applies to all contracts and procurements under federal awards, regardless of dollar amount, including those conducted under simplified acquisition procedures. Verification must be performed by checking the System for Award management (SAM.gov) or obtaining a written certification from the vendor. Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the District in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the simplified acquisitions procurement method of the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Cause: The District's management had not developed a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with the compliance requirements listed above. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the District at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: There were two contracts subject to procurement and suspension and debarment during the year. For both procurements, the District could only provide final signed contracts and did not have evidence of the full bid process. For the first selection, the District provided the request for proposal but did not provide all bids that were received or a scoring rubric to support why the District selected the vendor. For the second selection, the request for proposal, bids received, and scoring rubric were not provided. Additionally, evidence of a suspension and debarment check for both selections was not available. The District did not have a formal procurement policy documented. Identification as a repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the District’s management establish controls related to the procurement process. The District should implement a formal procurement and suspension and debarment policy that states the process that is required for procurements based on the procurement amount. The policy should outline the requirement for a request for proposal, number of bids required, scoring rubric, and suspension and debarment check. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.