Audit 370806

FY End
2024-12-31
Total Expended
$3.88M
Findings
4
Programs
6
Year: 2024 Accepted: 2025-10-14
Auditor: Eide Bailly LLP

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
1160388 2024-003 Material Weakness Yes L
1160389 2024-004 Material Weakness Yes E
1160390 2024-003 Material Weakness Yes L
1160391 2024-004 Material Weakness Yes E

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
14.871 Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers $3.18M Yes 2
14.872 Public Housing Capital Fund $278,467 Yes 0
14.879 Mainstream Vouchers $182,998 Yes 2
14.850 Public Housing Operating Fund $173,268 Yes 0
14.239 Home Investment Partnerships Program $35,303 Yes 0
14.231 Emergency Solutions Grant Program $30,000 Yes 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
NNJUR1Q5MXH5 Jennifer Fugman Auditee
6052262321 Tara Engquist Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the schedule) includes the federal award activity of the Commission under programs of the federal government for the year ended December 31, 2024. The information is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the Commission, it is not intended to, and does not, present the financial position, changes in net position, or cash flows of the Commission. The Commission received federal awards both directly from federal agencies and indirectly through pass-through entities. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards presents only the activity of federal award programs of the Commission and one discretely presented component unit, Housing Plus, Inc. It excludes any federal awards of the other discretely presented component units.

Finding Details

Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Cluster Federal Financial Assistance Listing 14.879 Mainstream Voucher Program Federal Financial Assistance Listing 14.871 Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program Reporting Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria: Controls over reporting should be in place to ensure that a person other than the person who prepares the reports for submission review the report for accuracy. Condition: The Commission does not have a review process in place to review the VMS reporting on a monthly basis and the annual REAC unaudited submission. Cause: The Commission experienced significant turnover in staff in 2023 and 2024 so the review process was not being completed on the reporting. Effect: Errors in reporting could occur that would not be detected on a timely basis by the Commission. Questioned Costs: None Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): Yes, finding 2023-002. Recommendation: With the turnover in staffing, we realize the new staff were not aware of the controls system that needed to be in place. We recommend a control process be in place so review of the submission can occur prior to submission for any noticeable errors. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with finding.
Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Cluster Federal Financial Assistance Listing 14.879 Mainstream Voucher Program Federal Financial Assistance Listing 14.871 Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program Eligibility Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria: As required by HUD guidelines, the Commission is required to calculate the tenant’s rent payment using documentation from third-party verification used to calculate payment of assistance. Condition: The Commission’s control in place for review of the tenant’s rent payment used for tenant files on annual reviews was not operating effectively. In two of the 60 tenant files tested, the tenant’s payment amounts were calculated incorrectly. Cause: The Housing Representative used the incorrect number of payments for payroll to annualize the income from the third party verification. Effect: The reporting of an incorrect tenant rent payment could result in incorrect assistance being awarded. Questioned Costs: None Context/Sampling: A nonstatistical sample of 60 participants out of 612 participants were selected for eligibility testing. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): No Recommendation: With the turnover in staffing, we realize the potential for errors to occur. We recommend additional review being completed on files by a second person to ensure calculations are completed correctly. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with finding.