Audit 370633

FY End
2024-12-31
Total Expended
$1.30M
Findings
1
Programs
1
Organization: Esperanza Foster Family Agency (CA)
Year: 2024 Accepted: 2025-10-09

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
1160254 2024-004 Material Weakness Yes B

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
93.658 Foster Care Title IV-E $1.30M Yes 1

Contacts

Name Title Type
E7E3GH3MD5H5 Rigoberto Gutierrez Auditee
5592419484 Larisa Murren Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) presents the activity of all federal award programs of Esperanza Foster Family Agency, Inc. (the Agency). Federal awards received directly from federal agencies, as well as federal awards passed through other government agencies are included in the schedule. The information in this SEFA is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance).
The accompanying SEFA is presented using the accrual basis of accounting, which is described in Note 2 of the Agency’s financial statements.
Federal award expenditures agree or can be reconciled with the amounts reported in the Agency’s financial statements.
The Agency has elected not to use the 10 percent de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance.

Finding Details

Condition: During testing of allowable costs/cost principles charged to the federal program, we identified a $450,000 payment made to a former executive in settlement of an employment dispute. This cost was charged directly to the federal program. Criteria: Title 2, CFR, Part 200, Subpart E-Cost Principles, Basic Considerations, section 200.403, Factors Affecting Allowability of Costs, states, in part, that “Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: a) be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award, b) be properly documented showing the business nature of the charge. Cause: Internal controls over allowable costs compliance requirements were not properly designed and were not placed in operation. Management is responsible for compliance with the requirements of allowable costs and for the design, implementation, and maintenance of effective internal controls over compliance with the requirements of laws, statutes, regulations, rules, and provisions of grant agreements applicable to its federal program. Effect: As a result, $450,000 of unallowable costs were charged to the program. This represents questioned costs that must be refunded to the federal awarding agency or otherwise resolved. Questioned Costs: $450,000 Recommendation: We recommend the Agency develop a written policies and procedures manual for allowable/unallowable costs compliance, which should include a checklist detailing all the necessary steps to ensure proper review of all costs charged to the federal program.