Audit 370446

FY End
2024-06-30
Total Expended
$2.73M
Findings
1
Programs
4
Organization: City of Atwater (CA)
Year: 2024 Accepted: 2025-10-03

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
1159904 2024-001 Material Weakness Yes I

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds $1.96M Yes 1
93.499 Low Income Household Water Assistance Program $278,933 Yes 0
20.205 Highway Planning and Construction $86,670 Yes 0
16.738 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Program $29,182 Yes 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
FFMEDABPXQM7 Anna Nicholas Auditee
2093576347 Ahmed Badawi Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

The financial reporting entity consists of (a) the primary government, City of Atwater, California (City), (b) organizations for which the primary government is financially accountable, and (c) other organizations for which the primary government is not accountable, but for which the nature and significance of their relationship with the primary government are such that exclusion would cause the reporting entity's financial statements to be misleading or incomplete.
Funds received under the various grant programs have been recorded within the general, special revenue, and capital projects funds of the City. The City utilizes the modified accrual basis of accounting for the general, special revenue, and capital projects funds. Expenditures of federal awards reported on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (Schedule) are recognized when incurred.
The accompanying Schedule presents the activity of all federal financial assistance programs of the City. Federal financial assistance received directly from federal agencies as well as federal financial assistance passed through the State of California is included in the Schedule. The Schedule was prepared only from the accounts of various grant programs and, therefore, does not present the financial position or results of operations of the City.
When federal awards were received from a pass-through entity, the Schedule shows, if available, the identifying number assigned by the pass-through entity. When no identifying number is shown, the City determined that no identifying number is assigned for the program, or the City was unable to obtain an identifying number from the pass-through entity.
The City did not elect to use indirect costs.

Finding Details

SA2024-001: Lack of Documentation for Suspension or Debarment Verification Criteria Per 2 CFR section 180.300, when a non-federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non-federal entity must verify that the entity is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by (1) checking the System for Award Management (SAM) Exclusions maintained by the General Services Administration (GSA) and available at SAM.gov (2) collecting a certification from the entity, or (3) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that entity. Condition The City failed to provide evidence demonstrating the verification of vendor’s eligibility before entering into a procurement contract. Cause The absence of documented proof regarding the verification of vendor’s eligibility for participation in the transaction is attributed to inadequate record-keeping practices rather than a failure to conduct the verification process. It appears that while the verification may have been conducted, the City did not retain sufficient documentation to demonstrate compliance with the requirement. Effect Without proper documentation, the City's procurement process lacks transparency and accountability, leading to challenges in demonstrating compliance with federal regulations. Recommendation The City should enhance its record-keeping practices to ensure that documentation of suspension or debarment verification is consistently maintained for all procurement transactions. Management Response The City has taken action by updating the procedures to now include a requirement for attaching the suspension and debarment verifications as part of the documentation process.