Audit 370009

2024-001 – Internal Controls over Compliance and Compliance with Procurement Standards Identification of the Federal Program - U.S. Department of the Treasury, Passed through Whitman-Walker Health System, Inc. 21.029 - COVID-19 – Coronavirus Capital Projects Fund Criteria – 2 CFR Section §200.318(i) states, “The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price.” Per 2 CFR Section §200.319, “All procurement transactions for the acquisition of property or services under a Federal award must be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with the standards of this section and §200.320.” 2 CFR Section §200.324 stipulates that a non-Federal entity must perform a cost or price analysis for each procurement in excess of a minimum threshold. Additionally, 2 CFR Section §200.320(c) states in part, “There are specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of [the defined] circumstances apply”. Condition – We noted there was insufficient documentation retained to support adherence to the required procurement policy and standards. Documentation was unable to be provided to support that cost or price analyses were performed and were conducted providing full and open competition. Additionally, for one procurement deemed noncompetitive by WWH, none of the circumstances allowing noncompetitive procurement were met. Cause – WWH did not maintain all required aspects of formal documentation as required by the applicable 2 CFR standards, was unable to provide evidence of full and open competition, and in one instance improperly elected noncompetitive procurement. Effect – We were unable to determine whether the value of procurements for goods or services that exceeded the micro-purchase threshold followed a proper formal procurement method in accordance with 2 CFR Sections §200.319, 320, and 324. Questioned costs – Not determinable Context – We selected a sample of 7 procurements by non-statistical methods, out of a population of 8 procurements. All procurements related to eligible pre-award costs. WWH was unable to provide sufficient formal procurement documentation to support full and open competition and performance of cost or price analysis for 4 out of 7 selected procurements. One of those samples was deemed noncompetitive by WWH but did not meet the circumstances allowing noncompetitive procurement. Repeat finding – This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation – We recommend WWH designate a responsible and qualified individual within the organization to oversee the procurement policy and ensure compliance. Additionally, we recommend WWH explore alternative organizational and tracking methods to ensure all procurements are properly tracked for workflow purposes and adequately maintained for retention. View of Responsible Officials - WWH has internal controls for the procurement process for federal funds and did not follow those practices as clearly with these investments. The utilization of team members with multiple responsibilities, without stronger controls, led to document retention challenges.