Audit 369146

2024-001 – ALN 14.871 – Housing Voucher Cluster – Eligibility Condition and Criteria: In accordance with HUD eligibility compliance requirement, Uniform Guidance Single Audit compliance requires that for tenant eligibility, tenant files include certain information and documentation that is both accurate and complete such as to obtain and document third-party verification of annual income and other factors that affect the determination of adjusted income or income-based rent, and then properly calculate the rent payment using this documentation. Per 24 CFR sections 5.230, 5.609, & 982.516, tenants are required to provide necessary information, documentation, and releases for the Authority to verify income eligibility. Per 24 CFR 982 Subpart K, the Authority should maintain a utility allowance schedule, determine if rent to owner is reasonable, and adopt a payment standard schedule that establishes voucher payment standard amounts for each FMR area in the PHA jurisdiction. During our audit, it was determined that internal control deficiencies over compliance existed over the Authority’s Housing Voucher Cluster eligibility determination process. The Authority's previous staff had inadequate internal controls over the Authority’s Section 8 tenant eligibility process which has led to incomplete and inaccurate eligibility documentation. Out of twenty tenant files tested for eligibility compliance, 30% of these files had exceptions where there were either missing third-party verification of income or deduction sources, missing or improperly filled out HUD required forms, missing EIV (Enterprise Income Verification) documentation, or instances in which the correct 50058 could not be provided. Context: H&P noted that 30% of the files tested had issues relating to missing third-party verification of income or deduction sources, missing or improperly filled out HUD required forms, missing EIV (Enterprise Income Verification) documentation, or instances in which the correct 50058 could not be provided. There were three instances noted where supporting third-party verification of income or deductions was missing. There were two instances in which the annual reexamination was not done in a timely manner. We determined that these internal control deficiencies and resulting noncompliance appeared to be consistent and prevalent among the Authority's tenant files. Questioned Costs: None. Cause: The Authority’s previous staff's internal controls over the Housing Voucher Cluster eligibility determination process that were in place lacked the necessary controls over information and communication of HUD regulatory requirements to properly follow HUD’s eligibility requirements as determined by 24 CFR. There appears to be a lack of quality control procedures in place regarding the monitoring of tenant files in order to catch inaccurate and/or incomplete required tenant eligibility documentation and rent calculations. Effect: Some of the Authority’s tenants were not and/or potentially not receiving the correct amount of Housing Assistance Payments, which in turn, can cause the tenants' portion of rent payments owed to the landlords to be incorrect. Some of these tenants may still be receiving an erroneous Housing Assistance Payment and could be paying the wrong amount to the landlords until the staff and management can perform interim reexaminations or annual reexaminations. Auditor’s Recommendation: We recommend the Authority's new Executive Director and Section 8 staff review the internal controls over Section 8 HCV eligibility to improve the detection and correction of misstatements. The Authority's new staff should be attentive when calculating the annualized income for tenants and ensure that all third-party verification of income and deductions is being obtained. The Authority should utilize effective monitoring controls to check the accuracy of tenant rent calculations and payment standards for each initial lease-up and reexamination and, if any errors have been made, the Authority can identify these quickly and take the necessary corrective action. Additionally, the Authority should continue performing internal quality control re-inspections (not to be performed by the same employee who performed the original lease-up or reexamination but by someone with adequate knowledge of the tenant eligibility process) of a sample of applicant and tenant files to ensure that all eligibility and reexamination steps are being performed properly and in line with Federal regulations and the Authority's Section 8 Administrative Plan policies and procedures. Grantee Response: The Executive Director acknowledges the finding and is following the auditor’s recommendation.