Audit 368617

FY End
2024-12-31
Total Expended
$11.52M
Findings
4
Programs
7
Organization: McR Health, Inc. (FL)
Year: 2024 Accepted: 2025-09-29

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Contacts

Name Title Type
KV6YNZRTNKC3 Kara Onorato Auditee
9417764000 Lorri Kidder Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

The accounting policies and presentation of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) have been designed to conform to generally accepted accounting principles, including the reporting and compliance requirements of the Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). The amounts reported on the schedule have been reconciled to and are in material agreement with amounts recorded in the Organization’s accounting records from which the basic consolidated financial statements have been reported. For purposes of the SEFA, federal awards include all grants, contracts, and similar agreements entered into directly with the federal government and other pass-through entities. The Organization has obtained the Assistance Listing Number (ALN) numbers to ensure that all programs have been identified in the schedule. ALN numbers have been appropriately listed by applicable programs. Federal programs with different ALN numbers that are closely related because they share common compliance requirements area defined as a cluster by the Uniform Guidance. A cluster is separately identified in the SEFA.
The Organization is the sub-recipient of federal funds that have been subjected to testing and are reported as expenditures and listed as federal pass-through funds.
Grant monies received and disbursed by the Organization are for specific purposes and are subject to review by the grantor agencies. Such audits may result in requests for reimbursement due to disallowed expenditures. Based upon prior experience, the Organization does not believe that such disallowance, if any, would have a material effect on the financial position of the Organization. As of December 31, 2024, there were no material questioned or disallowed costs as a result of grant audits in process or completed.

Finding Details

Assistance Listing Number: 93.224 and 93.527 Name of Federal Agency: Department of Health and Human Services, HRSA Program Title: Health Center Program Compliance Requirement: Special Tests and Provisions – Sliding Fee Discounts Pass-through Entity: N/A Federal Grant/Contract Number and Grant Year: 5 H80C00097-23-00 (2024), 6 H80CS00097-23-14 (2024), 1 H8GCS47591-01-00 (2022 and 2023), 1 H8LCS50961-01-00 (2023 and 2024) Finding Type: Noncompliance and Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Known Questioned Costs: $279 Condition: The Organization did not follow the correct processes of review and approval of the application of the sliding fee scale. - Failure to provide approval of one of the sliding fee scale applications. - One patient listed in the sliding fee scale population did not have an application. - One sliding fee scale claim was incorrectly applied to the slide as the patient had insurance. Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 requires that nonfederal entities receiving federal awards establish and maintain internal control over the federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal awards. Health centers must prepare and apply a sliding fee discount schedule, so that the amounts owed for health center services by eligible patients are adjusted based on the patient’s ability to pay (42 U.S.C 254b(k)(3)(G)(i)). The patient’s ability to pay is based on the official poverty guidelines, as revised annually by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (42 U.S.C 9902(2). Cause: Failure to apply the sliding fee correctly, as noted in the encounters above, was due to improper staff training or failure to properly monitor the process. Perspective: Out of the forty items sampled, 2 instances contained exceptions resulting in noncompliance. The total dollar value of the exceptions in the sample was $279 out of a total dollar amount of $8,454 sampled. Extrapolated over the population dollar value of $11,803,872, the projected error was $389,549 likely questioned costs. The sample was not statistically valid. Effect: The Organization could be incorrectly billing for services Recommendation: Staff should be consistently trained in how patients should complete the intake forms, including the sliding fee scale application, and require patients complete the form appropriately, including refusal to provide information, if applicable. Staff should also be consistently trained in what documentation is considered sufficient to support income identified as well as verify the application is consistent with the documentation and, when needed, clearly document the reasons for inconsistency. Staff should make every effort to obtain documentation of patient income in accordance with internal policies and procedures. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: See Corrective Action Plan