Audit 368421

FY End
2024-12-31
Total Expended
$792,134
Findings
1
Programs
3
Organization: Borincana Foundation, Inc. (PR)
Year: 2024 Accepted: 2025-09-29

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
1155982 2024-001 Material Weakness Yes L

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
14.228 Community Development Block Grants/state's Program and Non-Entitlement Grants in Hawaii $527,398 Yes 1
10.868 Rural Energy for America Program $136,986 Yes 0
10.351 Rural Business Development Grant $127,750 Yes 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
EHVAPGBSMVR9 Thomas King Auditee
9145527220 Juan Carlos Zuniga Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (the Schedule) includes the federal awards activities of Borincana Foundation, Inc. (the Organization) under programs of the federal government for the year ended December 31, 2024. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of the Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of Borincana Foundation, Inc., it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net assets, or cash flows of Borincana Foundation, Inc.
Expenditures reported in the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowed or are limited as to reimbursement. Negative amounts shown in the Schedule, if any, represent adjustments or credits made in the normal course of business to amounts reported as expenditures in prior years. Additional policies are the following: (a) The financial transactions are recorded by the Organization in accordance with the terms and conditions of the grants, which are consistent with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. (b) Expenditures are recognized in the accounting period in which the liability is incurred, if measurable, or when paid, whichever occurs first.
The assistance listing numbers included in the Schedule are determined based on the program’s name. The assistance listing number is a program identification, whose first two digits identify the federal department or agency that administers the program, and the last three numbers are assigned by numerical sequence.
Major programs are identified in the Summary of Audits Results Section of the Schedules of Findings and Questioned Cost.
The Organization does not have a federally negotiated indirect cost rate agreement (NICRA). In accordance with 2 CFR 200.414(f), the Organization has elected to use the 10 percent de minimis indirect cost rate on modified total direct costs (MTDC) for applicable federal programs.
The dollar threshold for Type A and Type B programs amounted to $750,000.

Finding Details

Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Federal program: Community Development Block Grant – Disaster Recovery (CDBG-DR) ALN: 14.228 Compliance requirement: Reporting Category: Compliance / Internal Control over Compliance Questioned Costs: None Repeat finding: No Condition: Monthly progress reports required under the CDBG-DR program were not filed within the required deadline of the 5th day following the reporting month. Although management prepared the reports, submission to the PRDOH system was delayed until the prior month’s report was reviewed and approved. As a result, all reports were ultimately submitted late. Criteria: 2 CFR 200.328 and the subrecipient agreement requires subrecipients to submit performance and financial reports by the deadlines established by the awarding agency. PRDOH has established that monthly reports must be filed no later than the 5th day of the month following the reporting period. Cause: Management indicated that reports were completed on time but could not be filed until PRDOH cleared the previous month’s report. This dependency caused delays outside of the Organization’s direct control. Effect: The Organization was not in compliance with established reporting deadlines. While no questioned costs were identified, late submission reduces the timeliness of information available for monitoring and increases the risk of additional oversight or restrictions by PRDOH. Recommendation: We recommend that management maintain evidence that reports are prepared by the required due date, even if PRDOH system delays prevent immediate submission. Copies of completed reports and correspondence with PRDOH should be retained to demonstrate compliance efforts. Management should also formally communicate with PRDOH regarding systemic delays and seek clarification to minimize future reporting exceptions.