Audit 368378

FY End
2024-12-31
Total Expended
$784,719
Findings
2
Programs
4
Organization: Democracy at Work Institute (CA)
Year: 2024 Accepted: 2025-09-29
Auditor: Han Group

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
1155967 2024-004 Material Weakness Yes CG
1155968 2024-004 Material Weakness Yes CG

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
98.001 Usaid Foreign Assistance for Programs Overseas $237,472 Yes 1
10.771 Rural Cooperative Development Grants $197,672 Yes 1
10.871 Socially-Disadvantaged Groups Grant $189,642 Yes 0
21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds $159,933 Yes 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
TK4FGHM7EWK7 Jaclyn MacE Auditee
8453231144 Lisa Lipsky Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (the Schedule) includes the federal grant activity of Democracy at Work Institute (the Organization) under programs of the federal government for the year ended December 31, 2024. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the Organization, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net assets, or cash flows of the Organization.
Expenditures reported in the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein, certain types of expenses are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement.
The Organization has elected to use the 10 percent de minimis indirect cost rate permitted under the Uniform Guidance on those federal awards that allow indirect costs. For federal awards that do not permit indirect costs, no indirect costs have been charged.
The Organization receives government awards from both the federal and municipal governments. The following table reconciles the expenditures reported in the Schedule to government awards revenue in the statement of activities of the financial statements.

Finding Details

Criteria or Specific Requirement: Per 2 CFR §200.302, nonfederal entities must establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards to provide reasonable assurance of compliance with applicable federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. • Cash Management requirements under 2 CFR §200.305 require that drawdowns be based on allowable costs incurred, supported by documentation, and reviewed for accuracy prior to submission. • Matching requirements under 2 CFR §200.306 require that cost sharing or matching contributions be verifiable from the entity’s records and documented in accordance with the cost principles. Entities must retain written documentation of the review and approval process before submission of reimbursement requests to ensure accuracy and compliance. Condition: The Organization maintained a written cash management policy; however, the policy did not specify that documentation of review and approval of reimbursement requests must be retained. As a result, the Organization was unable to provide written evidence of review and approval prior to submission of certain reimbursement requests. In addition, the Organization did not have a formal written policy addressing the review, approval, and documentation of matching contributions to ensure they are allowable, verifiable, and in compliance with federal requirements. While management indicated that a review process occurs, the lack of documented approval reduces the audit trail and does not provide adequate evidence that costs included in the requests were reviewed for accuracy, allowability, and compliance with both cash management and matching requirements. Cause: The lack of specificity in the cash management policy regarding retention of documented approvals, combined with the absence of a written matching policy, resulted in a lack of written documentation of the review and approval process that could be verified. Effect or Potential Effect: Without documented approval for reimbursement requests or a formal policy over matching, there is an increased risk that unallowable or unsupported costs could be included in reimbursement requests or that matching contributions could be inaccurately reported, potentially resulting in noncompliance with federal requirements. Questioned Costs: Not applicable as there were no questioned costs related to noncompliance. Recommendation: We recommend the Organization strengthen its internal controls over cash management and matching by implementing the following: 1. Update the cash management policy to require documented review and approval of reimbursement requests, with such documentation retained as part of the grant record. 2. Develop and implement a formal written matching policy that includes procedures for review, approval, and documentation of matching contributions to ensure compliance with 2 CFR §200.306. Repeat finding from prior year: No – this is the Organization’s first single audit. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding. See attached corrective action plan.