Audit 368039

FY End
2024-12-31
Total Expended
$4.81M
Findings
6
Programs
4
Year: 2024 Accepted: 2025-09-26

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
1155747 2024-001 Material Weakness Yes L
1155748 2024-001 Material Weakness Yes L
1155749 2024-001 Material Weakness Yes L
1155750 2024-002 Material Weakness Yes P
1155751 2024-002 Material Weakness Yes P
1155752 2024-002 Material Weakness Yes P

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
14.879 Mainstream Vouchers $950,875 Yes 2
14.871 Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers $254,269 Yes 2
10.427 Rural Rental Assistance Payments $110,444 Yes 0
10.415 Rural Rental Housing Loans $16,833 Yes 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
NEPJVGASF8L1 Nancy Nash-Mendez Auditee
5094223721 Steven Judd Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Except as noted below, the amounts shown as current year expenditures represent only the federal award portion of the program costs. Entire program costs, including the Authority’s portion, are more than shown. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, wherein certain types of expenditures are limited as to reimbursement. The amounts shown as federal expenditures for the Supportive Housing for Persons with Disabilities (5-Year Main Stream) Program (ALN 14.879) represents grant portions of the program costs. Entire program costs, including HAOC’s portion, totaled $950,875 for the year ended December 31, 2024. The amounts shown as federal expenditures for the USDA Rural Development programs represent grant portions of the program costs for the Twisp Gardens Apartments, Elmwood Apartments, Peachtree Apartments, and Omak Pioneer Gardens (ALN 10.415 and 10.427). Included are outstanding loan balance at year-end, annual interest subsidy per USDA RD loan agreement, and rental assistance payments. Entire program costs, including HAOC’s portion, totaled $485,201 for the year ended December 31, 2024.
The amount listed for each loan includes the proceeds received during the year and the outstanding loan balance from the prior year. The balance outstanding on the loans at December 31, 2024 are as follows: Twisp Gardens USDA Loan 56-024-91 169473-010 $ 158,287 Peachtree Apartments USDA Loan 56-024-78 6869895-02-4 516,779 Elmwood Apartments USDA Loan 56-024-78 6869895-03-6 528,202 Omak Pioneer Gardens USDA Loan 56-024-78 6869895-48 88,975
No amounts expended during the year ended December 31, 2024, were passed through to sub-recipients

Finding Details

2024-001 Reporting - Late Federal Audit Clearinghouse and HUD REAC Submissions Federal Award: Entity-wide (all federal awards on SEFA) Finding: The Authority did not file its annual 2023 Single Audit and Data Collection forms, or its Financial Data Schedule timely and prior to the deadline of September 30, 2024. Repeat Finding: Yes Criteria: The Single Audit Reporting Package and Data Collection Form shall be submitted to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC) 30 days after receipt of the auditor’s report, or 9 months after the end of the fiscal year, whichever comes first. In addition, Public Housing Authorities are required to submit audited data to HUD’s REAC system no later than nine months after the end of their fiscal year. Sample Size and Population: Sampling was not applicable to this finding. Condition and context: During the audit we noted that both the 2023 Single Audit Reporting Package and Data Collection Form and the 2023 HUD-REAC audited financial data schedules due on September 30, 2024 were submitted on December 31, 2024. Cause: The Authority was still working on the year-end accounting and preparing complete draft financial statements more than eight months after both their fiscal years ended December 31, 2023, which delayed the audit and resulted in late submissions of both the Single Audit and Data Collection Forms and the audited financial data schedules. Effect: Noncompliance with HUD and the Uniform Guidance may reduce future funding from Federal sources. Recommendation: We recommend in the future that the Authority implement procedures and ensure staffing is adequate such that they can complete their accounting period close and draft financial statements within 4-5 months of their yearend. This will allow sufficient time for the audit to be completed and for all audit reports to be submitted timely. Questioned Costs: None Management Response: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a response which is reported in the “Corrective Action Plan” at the end of this report. Contact Person: Nancy Nash Mendez, Executive Director
2024-001 Reporting - Late Federal Audit Clearinghouse and HUD REAC Submissions Federal Award: Entity-wide (all federal awards on SEFA) Finding: The Authority did not file its annual 2023 Single Audit and Data Collection forms, or its Financial Data Schedule timely and prior to the deadline of September 30, 2024. Repeat Finding: Yes Criteria: The Single Audit Reporting Package and Data Collection Form shall be submitted to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC) 30 days after receipt of the auditor’s report, or 9 months after the end of the fiscal year, whichever comes first. In addition, Public Housing Authorities are required to submit audited data to HUD’s REAC system no later than nine months after the end of their fiscal year. Sample Size and Population: Sampling was not applicable to this finding. Condition and context: During the audit we noted that both the 2023 Single Audit Reporting Package and Data Collection Form and the 2023 HUD-REAC audited financial data schedules due on September 30, 2024 were submitted on December 31, 2024. Cause: The Authority was still working on the year-end accounting and preparing complete draft financial statements more than eight months after both their fiscal years ended December 31, 2023, which delayed the audit and resulted in late submissions of both the Single Audit and Data Collection Forms and the audited financial data schedules. Effect: Noncompliance with HUD and the Uniform Guidance may reduce future funding from Federal sources. Recommendation: We recommend in the future that the Authority implement procedures and ensure staffing is adequate such that they can complete their accounting period close and draft financial statements within 4-5 months of their yearend. This will allow sufficient time for the audit to be completed and for all audit reports to be submitted timely. Questioned Costs: None Management Response: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a response which is reported in the “Corrective Action Plan” at the end of this report. Contact Person: Nancy Nash Mendez, Executive Director
2024-001 Reporting - Late Federal Audit Clearinghouse and HUD REAC Submissions Federal Award: Entity-wide (all federal awards on SEFA) Finding: The Authority did not file its annual 2023 Single Audit and Data Collection forms, or its Financial Data Schedule timely and prior to the deadline of September 30, 2024. Repeat Finding: Yes Criteria: The Single Audit Reporting Package and Data Collection Form shall be submitted to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC) 30 days after receipt of the auditor’s report, or 9 months after the end of the fiscal year, whichever comes first. In addition, Public Housing Authorities are required to submit audited data to HUD’s REAC system no later than nine months after the end of their fiscal year. Sample Size and Population: Sampling was not applicable to this finding. Condition and context: During the audit we noted that both the 2023 Single Audit Reporting Package and Data Collection Form and the 2023 HUD-REAC audited financial data schedules due on September 30, 2024 were submitted on December 31, 2024. Cause: The Authority was still working on the year-end accounting and preparing complete draft financial statements more than eight months after both their fiscal years ended December 31, 2023, which delayed the audit and resulted in late submissions of both the Single Audit and Data Collection Forms and the audited financial data schedules. Effect: Noncompliance with HUD and the Uniform Guidance may reduce future funding from Federal sources. Recommendation: We recommend in the future that the Authority implement procedures and ensure staffing is adequate such that they can complete their accounting period close and draft financial statements within 4-5 months of their yearend. This will allow sufficient time for the audit to be completed and for all audit reports to be submitted timely. Questioned Costs: None Management Response: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a response which is reported in the “Corrective Action Plan” at the end of this report. Contact Person: Nancy Nash Mendez, Executive Director
2024-002 Special Tests and Provisions – Program Administration Federal Award: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) – Housing Choice Voucher Cluster (ALN 14.871/14.879) Finding: The Authority’s tenant files and program procedures did not fully comply with HUD documentation and administrative procedure requirements. Repeat Finding: Yes. Criteria: HUD has established various compliance and documentation requirements related to the use of Federal funds. These compliance and documentation requirements impact many areas of HUD compliance and reporting such as, but not limited to, program administration, tenant certifications and recertification procedures, tenant income eligibility, document retention requirements and documentation within tenant files. Sample Size and Population: Population of the program is 357 tenants of which 25 tenant files were selected for testing. An additional 10 files were selected for testing as noted in HUD’s monitoring letter dated May 23, 2024. Condition and context: In addition to the auditor file review procedures, the Authority was selected for a Comprehensive Compliance Monitoring Review by the HUD field office which issued a letter dated May 23, 2024 noting a number of instances of non-compliance with HUD program administrative requirements, tenant eligibility and documentation requirements. Of the combined 35 tenant files reviewed, the following instances of noncompliance with specific HUD compliance requirements were noted as follows: • Seven tenant files – Certain documentation required by HUD program requirements was not retained in the file. • Four tenant files – Subsidy amount determined by the Authority did not comply with HUD program requirements. • Four tenant files – Income verification procedures performed and documentation retained did not comply with HUD program requirements. • Four tenant files – Asset verification procedures performed and documentation retained did not comply with HUD program requirements. • Two tenant files – Rent increase notices did not comply with the 30 day notification requirement • One tenant file – The lease agreement did not conform to HUD requirements • One tenant file – The utility allowance did not agree to the HUD-52580 In addition, in the Comprehensive Compliance Monitoring Review letter dated May 23, 2024 identified a number of administrative areas of non-compliance as well as some errors and inconsistencies with information reported through the PIH Information Center (PIC) Error and Voucher Management System (VMS). Cause: The Authority process and procedures were inconsistent with established HUD program requirements. Effect: The Authority did not comply with HUD program requirements regarding program administration, tenant certifications and recertification procedures, tenant income eligibility, document retention requirements. Recommendation: The Authority should review, update and modify its established program process and procedures to fully comply with established HUD program requirements. Questioned Costs: None Management Response: Management agrees with the finding and we have prepared a response which is reported in the “Corrective Action Plan” at the end of this report. As noted in our Corrective Action Plan, the Authority has fully responded to the Comprehensive Compliance Monitoring Review and corrected the various deficiencies noted in the report. The Authority received notification on October 30, 2024 that HUD has accepted the Authority’s response and resolution of the deficiencies noted and that the matter is closed. Contact Person: Nancy Nash Mendez, Executive Director
2024-002 Special Tests and Provisions – Program Administration Federal Award: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) – Housing Choice Voucher Cluster (ALN 14.871/14.879) Finding: The Authority’s tenant files and program procedures did not fully comply with HUD documentation and administrative procedure requirements. Repeat Finding: Yes. Criteria: HUD has established various compliance and documentation requirements related to the use of Federal funds. These compliance and documentation requirements impact many areas of HUD compliance and reporting such as, but not limited to, program administration, tenant certifications and recertification procedures, tenant income eligibility, document retention requirements and documentation within tenant files. Sample Size and Population: Population of the program is 357 tenants of which 25 tenant files were selected for testing. An additional 10 files were selected for testing as noted in HUD’s monitoring letter dated May 23, 2024. Condition and context: In addition to the auditor file review procedures, the Authority was selected for a Comprehensive Compliance Monitoring Review by the HUD field office which issued a letter dated May 23, 2024 noting a number of instances of non-compliance with HUD program administrative requirements, tenant eligibility and documentation requirements. Of the combined 35 tenant files reviewed, the following instances of noncompliance with specific HUD compliance requirements were noted as follows: • Seven tenant files – Certain documentation required by HUD program requirements was not retained in the file. • Four tenant files – Subsidy amount determined by the Authority did not comply with HUD program requirements. • Four tenant files – Income verification procedures performed and documentation retained did not comply with HUD program requirements. • Four tenant files – Asset verification procedures performed and documentation retained did not comply with HUD program requirements. • Two tenant files – Rent increase notices did not comply with the 30 day notification requirement • One tenant file – The lease agreement did not conform to HUD requirements • One tenant file – The utility allowance did not agree to the HUD-52580 In addition, in the Comprehensive Compliance Monitoring Review letter dated May 23, 2024 identified a number of administrative areas of non-compliance as well as some errors and inconsistencies with information reported through the PIH Information Center (PIC) Error and Voucher Management System (VMS). Cause: The Authority process and procedures were inconsistent with established HUD program requirements. Effect: The Authority did not comply with HUD program requirements regarding program administration, tenant certifications and recertification procedures, tenant income eligibility, document retention requirements. Recommendation: The Authority should review, update and modify its established program process and procedures to fully comply with established HUD program requirements. Questioned Costs: None Management Response: Management agrees with the finding and we have prepared a response which is reported in the “Corrective Action Plan” at the end of this report. As noted in our Corrective Action Plan, the Authority has fully responded to the Comprehensive Compliance Monitoring Review and corrected the various deficiencies noted in the report. The Authority received notification on October 30, 2024 that HUD has accepted the Authority’s response and resolution of the deficiencies noted and that the matter is closed. Contact Person: Nancy Nash Mendez, Executive Director
2024-002 Special Tests and Provisions – Program Administration Federal Award: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) – Housing Choice Voucher Cluster (ALN 14.871/14.879) Finding: The Authority’s tenant files and program procedures did not fully comply with HUD documentation and administrative procedure requirements. Repeat Finding: Yes. Criteria: HUD has established various compliance and documentation requirements related to the use of Federal funds. These compliance and documentation requirements impact many areas of HUD compliance and reporting such as, but not limited to, program administration, tenant certifications and recertification procedures, tenant income eligibility, document retention requirements and documentation within tenant files. Sample Size and Population: Population of the program is 357 tenants of which 25 tenant files were selected for testing. An additional 10 files were selected for testing as noted in HUD’s monitoring letter dated May 23, 2024. Condition and context: In addition to the auditor file review procedures, the Authority was selected for a Comprehensive Compliance Monitoring Review by the HUD field office which issued a letter dated May 23, 2024 noting a number of instances of non-compliance with HUD program administrative requirements, tenant eligibility and documentation requirements. Of the combined 35 tenant files reviewed, the following instances of noncompliance with specific HUD compliance requirements were noted as follows: • Seven tenant files – Certain documentation required by HUD program requirements was not retained in the file. • Four tenant files – Subsidy amount determined by the Authority did not comply with HUD program requirements. • Four tenant files – Income verification procedures performed and documentation retained did not comply with HUD program requirements. • Four tenant files – Asset verification procedures performed and documentation retained did not comply with HUD program requirements. • Two tenant files – Rent increase notices did not comply with the 30 day notification requirement • One tenant file – The lease agreement did not conform to HUD requirements • One tenant file – The utility allowance did not agree to the HUD-52580 In addition, in the Comprehensive Compliance Monitoring Review letter dated May 23, 2024 identified a number of administrative areas of non-compliance as well as some errors and inconsistencies with information reported through the PIH Information Center (PIC) Error and Voucher Management System (VMS). Cause: The Authority process and procedures were inconsistent with established HUD program requirements. Effect: The Authority did not comply with HUD program requirements regarding program administration, tenant certifications and recertification procedures, tenant income eligibility, document retention requirements. Recommendation: The Authority should review, update and modify its established program process and procedures to fully comply with established HUD program requirements. Questioned Costs: None Management Response: Management agrees with the finding and we have prepared a response which is reported in the “Corrective Action Plan” at the end of this report. As noted in our Corrective Action Plan, the Authority has fully responded to the Comprehensive Compliance Monitoring Review and corrected the various deficiencies noted in the report. The Authority received notification on October 30, 2024 that HUD has accepted the Authority’s response and resolution of the deficiencies noted and that the matter is closed. Contact Person: Nancy Nash Mendez, Executive Director