Audit 367888

FY End
2024-12-31
Total Expended
$836,997
Findings
2
Programs
1
Year: 2024 Accepted: 2025-09-26

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
1155644 2024-001 Material Weakness Yes B
1155645 2024-002 Material Weakness Yes B

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
11.307 Economic Adjustment Assistance $836,997 Yes 2

Contacts

Name Title Type
CLDSHUBTP6A1 Anthony Wigglesworth Auditee
2157327476 Paul Selfinger Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (the Schedule) includes the Federal grant activity of the Philadelphia Area Labor-Management Committee Inc under programs of the federal government for the year ended December 31, 2023. The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the Philadelphia Area Labor-Management Committee Inc it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net assets, or cash flows of the Philadelphia Area Labor-Management Committee Inc.
Expenditures reported in the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement.
The Philadelphia Area Labor-Management Committee Inc has elected not to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance.

Finding Details

COCONDITION: Employee time and effort reports were not consistently completed, certified, and maintained in accordance with the grant requirements. The auditor's review of a sample of employee timesheets found discrepancies in how time was allocated and reported for federal projects versus the PALM’s internal records. CRITERIA: The PALM is required by federal grant guidelines, specifically 2 CFR 200.430, to maintain internal controls over all aspects of their federal awards. This includes accurate and consistent documentation of personnel activity reports, timesheets, and payroll distribution records to support the direct labor costs charged to federal awards. CAUSE: The PALM lacked a formal, documented policy and procedure for tracking, certifying, and approving employee time spent on grant-related activities. Insufficient training was provided to employees and supervisors regarding the specific documentation requirements for federal grants. This resulted in personnel recording their time using inconsistent methods, including estimations at the end of a pay period, which increased the risk of inaccurate billing. EFFECT: Inaccurate time allocation led to the questioning of $65,664 in costs charged to the federal award. Since the timekeeping records did not provide reliable assurance that employee compensation was accurately charged, a portion of the labor costs was unsupported. This finding exposes the PALM to the risk of having to repay the federal agency for unallowable costs and could impact future grant funding. RECOMMENDATION: We recommend that the PALM utilize a time management software which integrates with their payroll processing, to easily identify direct labor costs related to the federal program. VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS AND PLANNED CORRECTIVE ACTION: The PALM agrees with the finding, and started utilizing a new time management software in 2025 to prevent overbilling of direct labor costs. QUESTIONED COSTS: A total of $54,211 in salaries and $11,453 in benefits were calculated as questioned costs, based on annualized differences from testing.
CONDITION: During our testing of federal expenditures, we selected a sample of 25 transactions. For twelve of these transactions, totaling $3,003, the PALM could not provide the original or reconstructed vendor receipts. The payments were supported only by credit card statements, which did not include a detailed description of the goods or services purchased. CRITERIA: The PALM is required by federal grant guidelines, specifically 2 CFR 200.302, to maintain records that sufficiently identify the amount, source, and expenditure of Federal funds for Federal awards. These records must contain information necessary to identify Federal awards, authorizations, financial obligations, unobligated balances, as well as assets, expenditures, income, and interest. All records must be supported by source documentation. CAUSE: The primary cause is a breakdown in the PALM’s internal controls over procurement and record-keeping. The lack of a consistent process to ensure all staff members who make purchases submit timely and complete receipts has created a weakness that could lead to unallowable costs being charged to the federal award. EFFECT: The lack of supporting documentation prevents the auditor from determining if the costs were necessary, reasonable, and for the exclusive purpose of the federal award. This also increases the risk of fraud, waste, and abuse. The grantee is at risk of having these costs disallowed and potentially required to repay the federal agency for the undocumented expenditures. RECOMMENDATION: We recommend that management implement a more robust internal control system to ensure all federal expenditures are supported by proper documentation. This includes: • Mandating that all employees submit itemized receipts for purchases made on federal awards. • Creating a "Missing Receipt" form that requires a detailed explanation and supervisory approval when an original receipt cannot be located. • Providing mandatory training for staff on proper procurement and documentation procedures. VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS AND PLANNED CORRECTIVE ACTION: The PALM believes the expenses referred to were indeed for allowable costs for the federal program. They will start to maintain all proper source documentation regardless of dollar amount. QUESTIONED COSTS: A total of $3,003 is being questioned for twelve transactions lacking adequate documentation.