Criteria or Specific Requirement – Special Tests Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA): Per 16 CFR Part 314, the institution is required to develop, implement, and maintain a comprehensive information security program that, at a minimum, addresses all seven required elements included in 16 CFR 314.3(a) and 16 CFR 314.6.
Condition – The College did not have a comprehensive information security program that covered all criteria required by the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024.
Questioned Costs - None noted.
Context – We reviewed the College’s comprehensive information security program noting that it addressed all required elements, however, this program was not implemented during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024.
Effect - The College was not in compliance with the GLBA requirements of the grant agreement program.
Cause – The College was in the process of preparing a comprehensive information security program, but it was not completed and implemented until after the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024.
Identification as a Repeat Finding - Not a repeat finding
Recommendation – We recommend that management establish procedures to ensure new requirements are identified and completed timely and accurately.
View of Responsible Official – There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Criteria or Specific Requirement – Special Tests Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA): Per 16 CFR Part 314, the institution is required to develop, implement, and maintain a comprehensive information security program that, at a minimum, addresses all seven required elements included in 16 CFR 314.3(a) and 16 CFR 314.6.
Condition – The College did not have a comprehensive information security program that covered all criteria required by the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024.
Questioned Costs - None noted.
Context – We reviewed the College’s comprehensive information security program noting that it addressed all required elements, however, this program was not implemented during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024.
Effect - The College was not in compliance with the GLBA requirements of the grant agreement program.
Cause – The College was in the process of preparing a comprehensive information security program, but it was not completed and implemented until after the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024.
Identification as a Repeat Finding - Not a repeat finding
Recommendation – We recommend that management establish procedures to ensure new requirements are identified and completed timely and accurately.
View of Responsible Official – There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Criteria or Specific Requirement – Special Tests Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA): Per 16 CFR Part 314, the institution is required to develop, implement, and maintain a comprehensive information security program that, at a minimum, addresses all seven required elements included in 16 CFR 314.3(a) and 16 CFR 314.6.
Condition – The College did not have a comprehensive information security program that covered all criteria required by the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024.
Questioned Costs - None noted.
Context – We reviewed the College’s comprehensive information security program noting that it addressed all required elements, however, this program was not implemented during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024.
Effect - The College was not in compliance with the GLBA requirements of the grant agreement program.
Cause – The College was in the process of preparing a comprehensive information security program, but it was not completed and implemented until after the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024.
Identification as a Repeat Finding - Not a repeat finding
Recommendation – We recommend that management establish procedures to ensure new requirements are identified and completed timely and accurately.
View of Responsible Official – There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Criteria or Specific Requirement – Special Tests Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA): Per 16 CFR Part 314, the institution is required to develop, implement, and maintain a comprehensive information security program that, at a minimum, addresses all seven required elements included in 16 CFR 314.3(a) and 16 CFR 314.6.
Condition – The College did not have a comprehensive information security program that covered all criteria required by the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024.
Questioned Costs - None noted.
Context – We reviewed the College’s comprehensive information security program noting that it addressed all required elements, however, this program was not implemented during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024.
Effect - The College was not in compliance with the GLBA requirements of the grant agreement program.
Cause – The College was in the process of preparing a comprehensive information security program, but it was not completed and implemented until after the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024.
Identification as a Repeat Finding - Not a repeat finding
Recommendation – We recommend that management establish procedures to ensure new requirements are identified and completed timely and accurately.
View of Responsible Official – There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Criteria or Specific Requirement – Special Tests Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA): Per 16 CFR Part 314, the institution is required to develop, implement, and maintain a comprehensive information security program that, at a minimum, addresses all seven required elements included in 16 CFR 314.3(a) and 16 CFR 314.6.
Condition – The College did not have a comprehensive information security program that covered all criteria required by the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024.
Questioned Costs - None noted.
Context – We reviewed the College’s comprehensive information security program noting that it addressed all required elements, however, this program was not implemented during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024.
Effect - The College was not in compliance with the GLBA requirements of the grant agreement program.
Cause – The College was in the process of preparing a comprehensive information security program, but it was not completed and implemented until after the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024.
Identification as a Repeat Finding - Not a repeat finding
Recommendation – We recommend that management establish procedures to ensure new requirements are identified and completed timely and accurately.
View of Responsible Official – There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Criteria or Specific Requirement – NSLDS Reporting: The Code of Federal Regulations, 34 CFR 685.309(b), states that Colleges must have some arrangement to report student enrollment data to the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS) through an enrollment roster file. The College is required to report changes in the student’s enrollment status, the effective date of the status, and an anticipated completion date.
Condition – Incorrect enrollment status was reported to NSLDS.
Questioned Costs - None noted.
Context – The enrollment status was incorrectly reported for 2 out of 25 students.
Effect – NSLDS did not contain the most up-to-date enrollment status.
Cause – The College uses the National Student Clearinghouse (NSC) to transmit data over to the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS). During the course of the year it was determined that some information did not properly interface.
Identification as a Repeat Finding - Not a repeat finding
Recommendation – The College should evaluate their policies and procedures related to reporting status changes to NSLDS and enhance as necessary to ensure that accurate information is reported to NSLDS.
View of Responsible Official – There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Criteria or Specific Requirement – NSLDS Reporting: The Code of Federal Regulations, 34 CFR 685.309(b), states that Colleges must have some arrangement to report student enrollment data to the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS) through an enrollment roster file. The College is required to report changes in the student’s enrollment status, the effective date of the status, and an anticipated completion date.
Condition – Incorrect enrollment status was reported to NSLDS.
Questioned Costs - None noted.
Context – The enrollment status was incorrectly reported for 2 out of 25 students.
Effect – NSLDS did not contain the most up-to-date enrollment status.
Cause – The College uses the National Student Clearinghouse (NSC) to transmit data over to the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS). During the course of the year it was determined that some information did not properly interface.
Identification as a Repeat Finding - Not a repeat finding
Recommendation – The College should evaluate their policies and procedures related to reporting status changes to NSLDS and enhance as necessary to ensure that accurate information is reported to NSLDS.
View of Responsible Official – There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Criteria or Specific Requirement – NSLDS Reporting: The Code of Federal Regulations, 34 CFR 685.309(b), states that Colleges must have some arrangement to report student enrollment data to the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS) through an enrollment roster file. The College is required to report changes in the student’s enrollment status, the effective date of the status, and an anticipated completion date.
Condition – Incorrect enrollment status was reported to NSLDS.
Questioned Costs - None noted.
Context – The enrollment status was incorrectly reported for 2 out of 25 students.
Effect – NSLDS did not contain the most up-to-date enrollment status.
Cause – The College uses the National Student Clearinghouse (NSC) to transmit data over to the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS). During the course of the year it was determined that some information did not properly interface.
Identification as a Repeat Finding - Not a repeat finding
Recommendation – The College should evaluate their policies and procedures related to reporting status changes to NSLDS and enhance as necessary to ensure that accurate information is reported to NSLDS.
View of Responsible Official – There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Criteria or Specific Requirement – NSLDS Reporting: The Code of Federal Regulations, 34 CFR 685.309(b), states that Colleges must have some arrangement to report student enrollment data to the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS) through an enrollment roster file. The College is required to report changes in the student’s enrollment status, the effective date of the status, and an anticipated completion date.
Condition – Incorrect enrollment status was reported to NSLDS.
Questioned Costs - None noted.
Context – The enrollment status was incorrectly reported for 2 out of 25 students.
Effect – NSLDS did not contain the most up-to-date enrollment status.
Cause – The College uses the National Student Clearinghouse (NSC) to transmit data over to the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS). During the course of the year it was determined that some information did not properly interface.
Identification as a Repeat Finding - Not a repeat finding
Recommendation – The College should evaluate their policies and procedures related to reporting status changes to NSLDS and enhance as necessary to ensure that accurate information is reported to NSLDS.
View of Responsible Official – There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Criteria or Specific Requirement – NSLDS Reporting: The Code of Federal Regulations, 34 CFR 685.309(b), states that Colleges must have some arrangement to report student enrollment data to the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS) through an enrollment roster file. The College is required to report changes in the student’s enrollment status, the effective date of the status, and an anticipated completion date.
Condition – Incorrect enrollment status was reported to NSLDS.
Questioned Costs - None noted.
Context – The enrollment status was incorrectly reported for 2 out of 25 students.
Effect – NSLDS did not contain the most up-to-date enrollment status.
Cause – The College uses the National Student Clearinghouse (NSC) to transmit data over to the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS). During the course of the year it was determined that some information did not properly interface.
Identification as a Repeat Finding - Not a repeat finding
Recommendation – The College should evaluate their policies and procedures related to reporting status changes to NSLDS and enhance as necessary to ensure that accurate information is reported to NSLDS.
View of Responsible Official – There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Criteria or Specific Requirement – Special Tests Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA): Per 16 CFR Part 314, the institution is required to develop, implement, and maintain a comprehensive information security program that, at a minimum, addresses all seven required elements included in 16 CFR 314.3(a) and 16 CFR 314.6.
Condition – The College did not have a comprehensive information security program that covered all criteria required by the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024.
Questioned Costs - None noted.
Context – We reviewed the College’s comprehensive information security program noting that it addressed all required elements, however, this program was not implemented during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024.
Effect - The College was not in compliance with the GLBA requirements of the grant agreement program.
Cause – The College was in the process of preparing a comprehensive information security program, but it was not completed and implemented until after the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024.
Identification as a Repeat Finding - Not a repeat finding
Recommendation – We recommend that management establish procedures to ensure new requirements are identified and completed timely and accurately.
View of Responsible Official – There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Criteria or Specific Requirement – Special Tests Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA): Per 16 CFR Part 314, the institution is required to develop, implement, and maintain a comprehensive information security program that, at a minimum, addresses all seven required elements included in 16 CFR 314.3(a) and 16 CFR 314.6.
Condition – The College did not have a comprehensive information security program that covered all criteria required by the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024.
Questioned Costs - None noted.
Context – We reviewed the College’s comprehensive information security program noting that it addressed all required elements, however, this program was not implemented during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024.
Effect - The College was not in compliance with the GLBA requirements of the grant agreement program.
Cause – The College was in the process of preparing a comprehensive information security program, but it was not completed and implemented until after the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024.
Identification as a Repeat Finding - Not a repeat finding
Recommendation – We recommend that management establish procedures to ensure new requirements are identified and completed timely and accurately.
View of Responsible Official – There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Criteria or Specific Requirement – Special Tests Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA): Per 16 CFR Part 314, the institution is required to develop, implement, and maintain a comprehensive information security program that, at a minimum, addresses all seven required elements included in 16 CFR 314.3(a) and 16 CFR 314.6.
Condition – The College did not have a comprehensive information security program that covered all criteria required by the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024.
Questioned Costs - None noted.
Context – We reviewed the College’s comprehensive information security program noting that it addressed all required elements, however, this program was not implemented during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024.
Effect - The College was not in compliance with the GLBA requirements of the grant agreement program.
Cause – The College was in the process of preparing a comprehensive information security program, but it was not completed and implemented until after the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024.
Identification as a Repeat Finding - Not a repeat finding
Recommendation – We recommend that management establish procedures to ensure new requirements are identified and completed timely and accurately.
View of Responsible Official – There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Criteria or Specific Requirement – Special Tests Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA): Per 16 CFR Part 314, the institution is required to develop, implement, and maintain a comprehensive information security program that, at a minimum, addresses all seven required elements included in 16 CFR 314.3(a) and 16 CFR 314.6.
Condition – The College did not have a comprehensive information security program that covered all criteria required by the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024.
Questioned Costs - None noted.
Context – We reviewed the College’s comprehensive information security program noting that it addressed all required elements, however, this program was not implemented during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024.
Effect - The College was not in compliance with the GLBA requirements of the grant agreement program.
Cause – The College was in the process of preparing a comprehensive information security program, but it was not completed and implemented until after the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024.
Identification as a Repeat Finding - Not a repeat finding
Recommendation – We recommend that management establish procedures to ensure new requirements are identified and completed timely and accurately.
View of Responsible Official – There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Criteria or Specific Requirement – Special Tests Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA): Per 16 CFR Part 314, the institution is required to develop, implement, and maintain a comprehensive information security program that, at a minimum, addresses all seven required elements included in 16 CFR 314.3(a) and 16 CFR 314.6.
Condition – The College did not have a comprehensive information security program that covered all criteria required by the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024.
Questioned Costs - None noted.
Context – We reviewed the College’s comprehensive information security program noting that it addressed all required elements, however, this program was not implemented during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024.
Effect - The College was not in compliance with the GLBA requirements of the grant agreement program.
Cause – The College was in the process of preparing a comprehensive information security program, but it was not completed and implemented until after the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024.
Identification as a Repeat Finding - Not a repeat finding
Recommendation – We recommend that management establish procedures to ensure new requirements are identified and completed timely and accurately.
View of Responsible Official – There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Criteria or Specific Requirement – NSLDS Reporting: The Code of Federal Regulations, 34 CFR 685.309(b), states that Colleges must have some arrangement to report student enrollment data to the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS) through an enrollment roster file. The College is required to report changes in the student’s enrollment status, the effective date of the status, and an anticipated completion date.
Condition – Incorrect enrollment status was reported to NSLDS.
Questioned Costs - None noted.
Context – The enrollment status was incorrectly reported for 2 out of 25 students.
Effect – NSLDS did not contain the most up-to-date enrollment status.
Cause – The College uses the National Student Clearinghouse (NSC) to transmit data over to the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS). During the course of the year it was determined that some information did not properly interface.
Identification as a Repeat Finding - Not a repeat finding
Recommendation – The College should evaluate their policies and procedures related to reporting status changes to NSLDS and enhance as necessary to ensure that accurate information is reported to NSLDS.
View of Responsible Official – There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Criteria or Specific Requirement – NSLDS Reporting: The Code of Federal Regulations, 34 CFR 685.309(b), states that Colleges must have some arrangement to report student enrollment data to the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS) through an enrollment roster file. The College is required to report changes in the student’s enrollment status, the effective date of the status, and an anticipated completion date.
Condition – Incorrect enrollment status was reported to NSLDS.
Questioned Costs - None noted.
Context – The enrollment status was incorrectly reported for 2 out of 25 students.
Effect – NSLDS did not contain the most up-to-date enrollment status.
Cause – The College uses the National Student Clearinghouse (NSC) to transmit data over to the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS). During the course of the year it was determined that some information did not properly interface.
Identification as a Repeat Finding - Not a repeat finding
Recommendation – The College should evaluate their policies and procedures related to reporting status changes to NSLDS and enhance as necessary to ensure that accurate information is reported to NSLDS.
View of Responsible Official – There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Criteria or Specific Requirement – NSLDS Reporting: The Code of Federal Regulations, 34 CFR 685.309(b), states that Colleges must have some arrangement to report student enrollment data to the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS) through an enrollment roster file. The College is required to report changes in the student’s enrollment status, the effective date of the status, and an anticipated completion date.
Condition – Incorrect enrollment status was reported to NSLDS.
Questioned Costs - None noted.
Context – The enrollment status was incorrectly reported for 2 out of 25 students.
Effect – NSLDS did not contain the most up-to-date enrollment status.
Cause – The College uses the National Student Clearinghouse (NSC) to transmit data over to the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS). During the course of the year it was determined that some information did not properly interface.
Identification as a Repeat Finding - Not a repeat finding
Recommendation – The College should evaluate their policies and procedures related to reporting status changes to NSLDS and enhance as necessary to ensure that accurate information is reported to NSLDS.
View of Responsible Official – There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Criteria or Specific Requirement – NSLDS Reporting: The Code of Federal Regulations, 34 CFR 685.309(b), states that Colleges must have some arrangement to report student enrollment data to the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS) through an enrollment roster file. The College is required to report changes in the student’s enrollment status, the effective date of the status, and an anticipated completion date.
Condition – Incorrect enrollment status was reported to NSLDS.
Questioned Costs - None noted.
Context – The enrollment status was incorrectly reported for 2 out of 25 students.
Effect – NSLDS did not contain the most up-to-date enrollment status.
Cause – The College uses the National Student Clearinghouse (NSC) to transmit data over to the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS). During the course of the year it was determined that some information did not properly interface.
Identification as a Repeat Finding - Not a repeat finding
Recommendation – The College should evaluate their policies and procedures related to reporting status changes to NSLDS and enhance as necessary to ensure that accurate information is reported to NSLDS.
View of Responsible Official – There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Criteria or Specific Requirement – NSLDS Reporting: The Code of Federal Regulations, 34 CFR 685.309(b), states that Colleges must have some arrangement to report student enrollment data to the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS) through an enrollment roster file. The College is required to report changes in the student’s enrollment status, the effective date of the status, and an anticipated completion date.
Condition – Incorrect enrollment status was reported to NSLDS.
Questioned Costs - None noted.
Context – The enrollment status was incorrectly reported for 2 out of 25 students.
Effect – NSLDS did not contain the most up-to-date enrollment status.
Cause – The College uses the National Student Clearinghouse (NSC) to transmit data over to the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS). During the course of the year it was determined that some information did not properly interface.
Identification as a Repeat Finding - Not a repeat finding
Recommendation – The College should evaluate their policies and procedures related to reporting status changes to NSLDS and enhance as necessary to ensure that accurate information is reported to NSLDS.
View of Responsible Official – There is no disagreement with the audit finding.