Audit 366192

FY End
2024-12-31
Total Expended
$1.28M
Findings
2
Programs
7
Year: 2024 Accepted: 2025-09-12
Auditor: Clark Nuber Ps

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
576320 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - M
1152762 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - M

Contacts

Name Title Type
X624NETQGAN8 Kim Goodman Auditee
3604862385 Mitchell Hansen Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Note 1 - Basis of Presentation Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following cost principles in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Pass-through entity identifying numbers are presented where available. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Association has elected not to use the de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the "Schedule") includes the federal award activity of the Washington Association of Sheriffs and Police Chiefs (the Association) under programs of the federal government for the year ended December 31, 2024. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the Association, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net assets, or cash flows of the Association.
Title: Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following cost principles in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Pass-through entity identifying numbers are presented where available. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Association has elected not to use the de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following cost principles in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Pass-through entity identifying numbers are presented where available.
Title: Note 3 - Indirect Cost Rate Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following cost principles in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Pass-through entity identifying numbers are presented where available. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Association has elected not to use the de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. The Association has elected not to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance.

Finding Details

Significant deficiency in internal controls over subrecipient monitoring. • Program Title: Substance Abuse Block Grants • Assistance Listing Number: 93.959 • Federal award identification number: B08TI085843 • Federal Agency: Department of Health and Human Services • Pass-through Entity: Washington State Health Care Authority Criteria 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) Subpart D section 2 CFR 200.332 requires that a pass-through entity must ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward. Condition/Context Washington Association of Sheriffs & Police Chiefs (the Association) passes substantially all federal funding through to subrecipients. During testing it was identified that, although the Association satisfied all ongoing monitoring requirements, on the coversheet of all subrecipient contracts in place during the year, a box indicating that the third party was not a subrecipient was incorrectly checked. This error by default incorrectly communicated to their subrecipients that they were contractors. Cause Washington Association of Sheriffs & Police Chiefs’ internal controls related to the review of subrecipient contracts were not functioning properly causing the pervasive error to be overlooked. Effect or potential effect Subrecipients were not clearly communicated their roles. Questioned costs N/A Repeat audit finding No Recommendation We recommend that Washington Association of Sheriffs & Police Chiefs ensure there is a proper understanding of the nature of a subrecipient vs a contractor, and that they ensure that this determination is being reviewed, and clearly communicated in underlying agreements, as part of their internal control processes Views of responsible officials Management agrees with the finding and has provided the corrective action plan following the Single Audit Report
Significant deficiency in internal controls over subrecipient monitoring. • Program Title: Substance Abuse Block Grants • Assistance Listing Number: 93.959 • Federal award identification number: B08TI085843 • Federal Agency: Department of Health and Human Services • Pass-through Entity: Washington State Health Care Authority Criteria 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) Subpart D section 2 CFR 200.332 requires that a pass-through entity must ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward. Condition/Context Washington Association of Sheriffs & Police Chiefs (the Association) passes substantially all federal funding through to subrecipients. During testing it was identified that, although the Association satisfied all ongoing monitoring requirements, on the coversheet of all subrecipient contracts in place during the year, a box indicating that the third party was not a subrecipient was incorrectly checked. This error by default incorrectly communicated to their subrecipients that they were contractors. Cause Washington Association of Sheriffs & Police Chiefs’ internal controls related to the review of subrecipient contracts were not functioning properly causing the pervasive error to be overlooked. Effect or potential effect Subrecipients were not clearly communicated their roles. Questioned costs N/A Repeat audit finding No Recommendation We recommend that Washington Association of Sheriffs & Police Chiefs ensure there is a proper understanding of the nature of a subrecipient vs a contractor, and that they ensure that this determination is being reviewed, and clearly communicated in underlying agreements, as part of their internal control processes Views of responsible officials Management agrees with the finding and has provided the corrective action plan following the Single Audit Report