Audit 365929

FY End
2024-12-31
Total Expended
$5.41M
Findings
16
Programs
5
Year: 2024 Accepted: 2025-09-09

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
576035 2024-002 Significant Deficiency - N
576036 2024-002 Significant Deficiency - N
576037 2024-002 Significant Deficiency - N
576038 2024-002 Significant Deficiency - N
576039 2024-003 - - L
576040 2024-003 - - L
576041 2024-003 - - L
576042 2024-003 - - L
1152477 2024-002 Significant Deficiency - N
1152478 2024-002 Significant Deficiency - N
1152479 2024-002 Significant Deficiency - N
1152480 2024-002 Significant Deficiency - N
1152481 2024-003 - - L
1152482 2024-003 - - L
1152483 2024-003 - - L
1152484 2024-003 - - L

Contacts

Name Title Type
WKDXG11GBR66 Peggy Anderson Auditee
4195226191 Wes Ernst Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Federal Loan Programs Accounting Policies: Note 1: Basis of Presentation - The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (Schedule) includes the federal award activity of the Organization under programs of the federal government for the year ended December 31, 2024. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the Organization, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net assets or cash flows of the Organization. Note 2: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Negative amounts shown on the Schedule, if any, represent adjustments or credits made in the normal course of business to amounts reported as expenditures in prior years. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Organization has elected not to use the 10 percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. The Organization administered no federal loan programs for the year ended December 31, 2024.

Finding Details

Information on the federal program – Assistance Listing Number 93.224/93.527, Health Center Program Cluster from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Federal Award No. 6 H80CS00581 for project period March 1, 2024 through February 28, 2025 Criteria or specific requirement – Health Centers must prepare and apply a sliding fee discount schedule that incorporates the provisions of 42 CFR 51c.303e through 56.303g to ensure that amounts owed for health center services by eligible patients are adjusted (discounted) based on the patient’s ability to pay. Condition – The audit of the major federal program identified errors in the application of sliding fee adjustments. Cause – The sliding fee calculation was improperly set up within the Electronic Health Record System. Effect or potential effect – Inaccurate application of sliding fee adjustments may result in potential noncompliance with program requirements. Questioned costs – Not applicable Context – Out of a population of 5,510 sliding fee adjustments, a sample of 25 adjustments were tested. Out of the 25 tested, 5 adjustments were incorrectly calculated based on the Organization’s sliding fee scales and the patient’s sliding fee application. A non-statistical sampling methodology was used to select the sample. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable – Not a repeat finding. Recommendation – We recommend that the Organization perform a review of the calculation of the sliding fee adjustments within the Electronic Health Record system to ensure it is properly set up. Additionally, we recommend that a member of management with an understanding of the Organization’s billing and sliding fee policies regularly review a sample of sliding fee adjustments in comparison to the Organization’s sliding fee policy. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions – The sliding fee adjustment errors resulted from an error in the set up of the automated adjustment calculation within the Electronic Health Record system. Management has identified the error with plans to ensure correction within the system. Further, the Organization will implement a process to periodically review sliding fee adjustments throughout the year for accuracy.
Information on the federal program – Assistance Listing Number 93.224/93.527, Health Center Program Cluster from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Federal Award No. 6 H80CS00581 for project period March 1, 2024 through February 28, 2025 Criteria or specific requirement – Health Centers must prepare and apply a sliding fee discount schedule that incorporates the provisions of 42 CFR 51c.303e through 56.303g to ensure that amounts owed for health center services by eligible patients are adjusted (discounted) based on the patient’s ability to pay. Condition – The audit of the major federal program identified errors in the application of sliding fee adjustments. Cause – The sliding fee calculation was improperly set up within the Electronic Health Record System. Effect or potential effect – Inaccurate application of sliding fee adjustments may result in potential noncompliance with program requirements. Questioned costs – Not applicable Context – Out of a population of 5,510 sliding fee adjustments, a sample of 25 adjustments were tested. Out of the 25 tested, 5 adjustments were incorrectly calculated based on the Organization’s sliding fee scales and the patient’s sliding fee application. A non-statistical sampling methodology was used to select the sample. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable – Not a repeat finding. Recommendation – We recommend that the Organization perform a review of the calculation of the sliding fee adjustments within the Electronic Health Record system to ensure it is properly set up. Additionally, we recommend that a member of management with an understanding of the Organization’s billing and sliding fee policies regularly review a sample of sliding fee adjustments in comparison to the Organization’s sliding fee policy. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions – The sliding fee adjustment errors resulted from an error in the set up of the automated adjustment calculation within the Electronic Health Record system. Management has identified the error with plans to ensure correction within the system. Further, the Organization will implement a process to periodically review sliding fee adjustments throughout the year for accuracy.
Information on the federal program – Assistance Listing Number 93.224/93.527, Health Center Program Cluster from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Federal Award No. 6 H80CS00581 for project period March 1, 2024 through February 28, 2025 Criteria or specific requirement – Health Centers must prepare and apply a sliding fee discount schedule that incorporates the provisions of 42 CFR 51c.303e through 56.303g to ensure that amounts owed for health center services by eligible patients are adjusted (discounted) based on the patient’s ability to pay. Condition – The audit of the major federal program identified errors in the application of sliding fee adjustments. Cause – The sliding fee calculation was improperly set up within the Electronic Health Record System. Effect or potential effect – Inaccurate application of sliding fee adjustments may result in potential noncompliance with program requirements. Questioned costs – Not applicable Context – Out of a population of 5,510 sliding fee adjustments, a sample of 25 adjustments were tested. Out of the 25 tested, 5 adjustments were incorrectly calculated based on the Organization’s sliding fee scales and the patient’s sliding fee application. A non-statistical sampling methodology was used to select the sample. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable – Not a repeat finding. Recommendation – We recommend that the Organization perform a review of the calculation of the sliding fee adjustments within the Electronic Health Record system to ensure it is properly set up. Additionally, we recommend that a member of management with an understanding of the Organization’s billing and sliding fee policies regularly review a sample of sliding fee adjustments in comparison to the Organization’s sliding fee policy. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions – The sliding fee adjustment errors resulted from an error in the set up of the automated adjustment calculation within the Electronic Health Record system. Management has identified the error with plans to ensure correction within the system. Further, the Organization will implement a process to periodically review sliding fee adjustments throughout the year for accuracy.
Information on the federal program – Assistance Listing Number 93.224/93.527, Health Center Program Cluster from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Federal Award No. 6 H80CS00581 for project period March 1, 2024 through February 28, 2025 Criteria or specific requirement – Health Centers must prepare and apply a sliding fee discount schedule that incorporates the provisions of 42 CFR 51c.303e through 56.303g to ensure that amounts owed for health center services by eligible patients are adjusted (discounted) based on the patient’s ability to pay. Condition – The audit of the major federal program identified errors in the application of sliding fee adjustments. Cause – The sliding fee calculation was improperly set up within the Electronic Health Record System. Effect or potential effect – Inaccurate application of sliding fee adjustments may result in potential noncompliance with program requirements. Questioned costs – Not applicable Context – Out of a population of 5,510 sliding fee adjustments, a sample of 25 adjustments were tested. Out of the 25 tested, 5 adjustments were incorrectly calculated based on the Organization’s sliding fee scales and the patient’s sliding fee application. A non-statistical sampling methodology was used to select the sample. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable – Not a repeat finding. Recommendation – We recommend that the Organization perform a review of the calculation of the sliding fee adjustments within the Electronic Health Record system to ensure it is properly set up. Additionally, we recommend that a member of management with an understanding of the Organization’s billing and sliding fee policies regularly review a sample of sliding fee adjustments in comparison to the Organization’s sliding fee policy. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions – The sliding fee adjustment errors resulted from an error in the set up of the automated adjustment calculation within the Electronic Health Record system. Management has identified the error with plans to ensure correction within the system. Further, the Organization will implement a process to periodically review sliding fee adjustments throughout the year for accuracy.
Information on the federal program – Assistance Listing Number 93.224/93.527, Health Center Program Cluster from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Federal Award No. 6 H80CS00581 for project period March 1, 2024 through February 28, 2025. Criteria or specific requirement – Health Centers must comply with federal reporting requirements. Condition – The Organization did not have data to support certain line items reported on the Uniform Data System (UDS) report filed. The amounts reported within table 5 line 8 column b and b2, table 5 line 10a, column b and b2 were not supportable by underlying data, and the amounts reported within table 9E line 1g column a, and line 1q column did not agree to underlying supporting data available. Cause – There was a lack of detailed review of the submitted report by someone with knowledge of the reporting requirements. Effect or potential effect – Inaccurate filing of reports may result in the federal program not being properly monitored, thus resulting in potential noncompliance with program requirements. Questioned costs – Not applicable Context – Out of a population of 1 special report that was required to be submitted during the year under audit (UDS), we selected this 1 report for testing. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable – Not a repeat finding. Recommendation – We recommend management implement an additional level of review by someone with knowledge of the reporting requirements. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions – To ensure compliance with federal reporting standards, the Organization will require a secondary review of all federal reports submitted to granting agencies. The designated secondary reviewer shall be an individual that has strong knowledge of the reporting requirements.
Information on the federal program – Assistance Listing Number 93.224/93.527, Health Center Program Cluster from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Federal Award No. 6 H80CS00581 for project period March 1, 2024 through February 28, 2025. Criteria or specific requirement – Health Centers must comply with federal reporting requirements. Condition – The Organization did not have data to support certain line items reported on the Uniform Data System (UDS) report filed. The amounts reported within table 5 line 8 column b and b2, table 5 line 10a, column b and b2 were not supportable by underlying data, and the amounts reported within table 9E line 1g column a, and line 1q column did not agree to underlying supporting data available. Cause – There was a lack of detailed review of the submitted report by someone with knowledge of the reporting requirements. Effect or potential effect – Inaccurate filing of reports may result in the federal program not being properly monitored, thus resulting in potential noncompliance with program requirements. Questioned costs – Not applicable Context – Out of a population of 1 special report that was required to be submitted during the year under audit (UDS), we selected this 1 report for testing. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable – Not a repeat finding. Recommendation – We recommend management implement an additional level of review by someone with knowledge of the reporting requirements. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions – To ensure compliance with federal reporting standards, the Organization will require a secondary review of all federal reports submitted to granting agencies. The designated secondary reviewer shall be an individual that has strong knowledge of the reporting requirements.
Information on the federal program – Assistance Listing Number 93.224/93.527, Health Center Program Cluster from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Federal Award No. 6 H80CS00581 for project period March 1, 2024 through February 28, 2025. Criteria or specific requirement – Health Centers must comply with federal reporting requirements. Condition – The Organization did not have data to support certain line items reported on the Uniform Data System (UDS) report filed. The amounts reported within table 5 line 8 column b and b2, table 5 line 10a, column b and b2 were not supportable by underlying data, and the amounts reported within table 9E line 1g column a, and line 1q column did not agree to underlying supporting data available. Cause – There was a lack of detailed review of the submitted report by someone with knowledge of the reporting requirements. Effect or potential effect – Inaccurate filing of reports may result in the federal program not being properly monitored, thus resulting in potential noncompliance with program requirements. Questioned costs – Not applicable Context – Out of a population of 1 special report that was required to be submitted during the year under audit (UDS), we selected this 1 report for testing. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable – Not a repeat finding. Recommendation – We recommend management implement an additional level of review by someone with knowledge of the reporting requirements. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions – To ensure compliance with federal reporting standards, the Organization will require a secondary review of all federal reports submitted to granting agencies. The designated secondary reviewer shall be an individual that has strong knowledge of the reporting requirements.
Information on the federal program – Assistance Listing Number 93.224/93.527, Health Center Program Cluster from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Federal Award No. 6 H80CS00581 for project period March 1, 2024 through February 28, 2025. Criteria or specific requirement – Health Centers must comply with federal reporting requirements. Condition – The Organization did not have data to support certain line items reported on the Uniform Data System (UDS) report filed. The amounts reported within table 5 line 8 column b and b2, table 5 line 10a, column b and b2 were not supportable by underlying data, and the amounts reported within table 9E line 1g column a, and line 1q column did not agree to underlying supporting data available. Cause – There was a lack of detailed review of the submitted report by someone with knowledge of the reporting requirements. Effect or potential effect – Inaccurate filing of reports may result in the federal program not being properly monitored, thus resulting in potential noncompliance with program requirements. Questioned costs – Not applicable Context – Out of a population of 1 special report that was required to be submitted during the year under audit (UDS), we selected this 1 report for testing. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable – Not a repeat finding. Recommendation – We recommend management implement an additional level of review by someone with knowledge of the reporting requirements. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions – To ensure compliance with federal reporting standards, the Organization will require a secondary review of all federal reports submitted to granting agencies. The designated secondary reviewer shall be an individual that has strong knowledge of the reporting requirements.
Information on the federal program – Assistance Listing Number 93.224/93.527, Health Center Program Cluster from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Federal Award No. 6 H80CS00581 for project period March 1, 2024 through February 28, 2025 Criteria or specific requirement – Health Centers must prepare and apply a sliding fee discount schedule that incorporates the provisions of 42 CFR 51c.303e through 56.303g to ensure that amounts owed for health center services by eligible patients are adjusted (discounted) based on the patient’s ability to pay. Condition – The audit of the major federal program identified errors in the application of sliding fee adjustments. Cause – The sliding fee calculation was improperly set up within the Electronic Health Record System. Effect or potential effect – Inaccurate application of sliding fee adjustments may result in potential noncompliance with program requirements. Questioned costs – Not applicable Context – Out of a population of 5,510 sliding fee adjustments, a sample of 25 adjustments were tested. Out of the 25 tested, 5 adjustments were incorrectly calculated based on the Organization’s sliding fee scales and the patient’s sliding fee application. A non-statistical sampling methodology was used to select the sample. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable – Not a repeat finding. Recommendation – We recommend that the Organization perform a review of the calculation of the sliding fee adjustments within the Electronic Health Record system to ensure it is properly set up. Additionally, we recommend that a member of management with an understanding of the Organization’s billing and sliding fee policies regularly review a sample of sliding fee adjustments in comparison to the Organization’s sliding fee policy. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions – The sliding fee adjustment errors resulted from an error in the set up of the automated adjustment calculation within the Electronic Health Record system. Management has identified the error with plans to ensure correction within the system. Further, the Organization will implement a process to periodically review sliding fee adjustments throughout the year for accuracy.
Information on the federal program – Assistance Listing Number 93.224/93.527, Health Center Program Cluster from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Federal Award No. 6 H80CS00581 for project period March 1, 2024 through February 28, 2025 Criteria or specific requirement – Health Centers must prepare and apply a sliding fee discount schedule that incorporates the provisions of 42 CFR 51c.303e through 56.303g to ensure that amounts owed for health center services by eligible patients are adjusted (discounted) based on the patient’s ability to pay. Condition – The audit of the major federal program identified errors in the application of sliding fee adjustments. Cause – The sliding fee calculation was improperly set up within the Electronic Health Record System. Effect or potential effect – Inaccurate application of sliding fee adjustments may result in potential noncompliance with program requirements. Questioned costs – Not applicable Context – Out of a population of 5,510 sliding fee adjustments, a sample of 25 adjustments were tested. Out of the 25 tested, 5 adjustments were incorrectly calculated based on the Organization’s sliding fee scales and the patient’s sliding fee application. A non-statistical sampling methodology was used to select the sample. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable – Not a repeat finding. Recommendation – We recommend that the Organization perform a review of the calculation of the sliding fee adjustments within the Electronic Health Record system to ensure it is properly set up. Additionally, we recommend that a member of management with an understanding of the Organization’s billing and sliding fee policies regularly review a sample of sliding fee adjustments in comparison to the Organization’s sliding fee policy. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions – The sliding fee adjustment errors resulted from an error in the set up of the automated adjustment calculation within the Electronic Health Record system. Management has identified the error with plans to ensure correction within the system. Further, the Organization will implement a process to periodically review sliding fee adjustments throughout the year for accuracy.
Information on the federal program – Assistance Listing Number 93.224/93.527, Health Center Program Cluster from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Federal Award No. 6 H80CS00581 for project period March 1, 2024 through February 28, 2025 Criteria or specific requirement – Health Centers must prepare and apply a sliding fee discount schedule that incorporates the provisions of 42 CFR 51c.303e through 56.303g to ensure that amounts owed for health center services by eligible patients are adjusted (discounted) based on the patient’s ability to pay. Condition – The audit of the major federal program identified errors in the application of sliding fee adjustments. Cause – The sliding fee calculation was improperly set up within the Electronic Health Record System. Effect or potential effect – Inaccurate application of sliding fee adjustments may result in potential noncompliance with program requirements. Questioned costs – Not applicable Context – Out of a population of 5,510 sliding fee adjustments, a sample of 25 adjustments were tested. Out of the 25 tested, 5 adjustments were incorrectly calculated based on the Organization’s sliding fee scales and the patient’s sliding fee application. A non-statistical sampling methodology was used to select the sample. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable – Not a repeat finding. Recommendation – We recommend that the Organization perform a review of the calculation of the sliding fee adjustments within the Electronic Health Record system to ensure it is properly set up. Additionally, we recommend that a member of management with an understanding of the Organization’s billing and sliding fee policies regularly review a sample of sliding fee adjustments in comparison to the Organization’s sliding fee policy. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions – The sliding fee adjustment errors resulted from an error in the set up of the automated adjustment calculation within the Electronic Health Record system. Management has identified the error with plans to ensure correction within the system. Further, the Organization will implement a process to periodically review sliding fee adjustments throughout the year for accuracy.
Information on the federal program – Assistance Listing Number 93.224/93.527, Health Center Program Cluster from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Federal Award No. 6 H80CS00581 for project period March 1, 2024 through February 28, 2025 Criteria or specific requirement – Health Centers must prepare and apply a sliding fee discount schedule that incorporates the provisions of 42 CFR 51c.303e through 56.303g to ensure that amounts owed for health center services by eligible patients are adjusted (discounted) based on the patient’s ability to pay. Condition – The audit of the major federal program identified errors in the application of sliding fee adjustments. Cause – The sliding fee calculation was improperly set up within the Electronic Health Record System. Effect or potential effect – Inaccurate application of sliding fee adjustments may result in potential noncompliance with program requirements. Questioned costs – Not applicable Context – Out of a population of 5,510 sliding fee adjustments, a sample of 25 adjustments were tested. Out of the 25 tested, 5 adjustments were incorrectly calculated based on the Organization’s sliding fee scales and the patient’s sliding fee application. A non-statistical sampling methodology was used to select the sample. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable – Not a repeat finding. Recommendation – We recommend that the Organization perform a review of the calculation of the sliding fee adjustments within the Electronic Health Record system to ensure it is properly set up. Additionally, we recommend that a member of management with an understanding of the Organization’s billing and sliding fee policies regularly review a sample of sliding fee adjustments in comparison to the Organization’s sliding fee policy. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions – The sliding fee adjustment errors resulted from an error in the set up of the automated adjustment calculation within the Electronic Health Record system. Management has identified the error with plans to ensure correction within the system. Further, the Organization will implement a process to periodically review sliding fee adjustments throughout the year for accuracy.
Information on the federal program – Assistance Listing Number 93.224/93.527, Health Center Program Cluster from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Federal Award No. 6 H80CS00581 for project period March 1, 2024 through February 28, 2025. Criteria or specific requirement – Health Centers must comply with federal reporting requirements. Condition – The Organization did not have data to support certain line items reported on the Uniform Data System (UDS) report filed. The amounts reported within table 5 line 8 column b and b2, table 5 line 10a, column b and b2 were not supportable by underlying data, and the amounts reported within table 9E line 1g column a, and line 1q column did not agree to underlying supporting data available. Cause – There was a lack of detailed review of the submitted report by someone with knowledge of the reporting requirements. Effect or potential effect – Inaccurate filing of reports may result in the federal program not being properly monitored, thus resulting in potential noncompliance with program requirements. Questioned costs – Not applicable Context – Out of a population of 1 special report that was required to be submitted during the year under audit (UDS), we selected this 1 report for testing. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable – Not a repeat finding. Recommendation – We recommend management implement an additional level of review by someone with knowledge of the reporting requirements. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions – To ensure compliance with federal reporting standards, the Organization will require a secondary review of all federal reports submitted to granting agencies. The designated secondary reviewer shall be an individual that has strong knowledge of the reporting requirements.
Information on the federal program – Assistance Listing Number 93.224/93.527, Health Center Program Cluster from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Federal Award No. 6 H80CS00581 for project period March 1, 2024 through February 28, 2025. Criteria or specific requirement – Health Centers must comply with federal reporting requirements. Condition – The Organization did not have data to support certain line items reported on the Uniform Data System (UDS) report filed. The amounts reported within table 5 line 8 column b and b2, table 5 line 10a, column b and b2 were not supportable by underlying data, and the amounts reported within table 9E line 1g column a, and line 1q column did not agree to underlying supporting data available. Cause – There was a lack of detailed review of the submitted report by someone with knowledge of the reporting requirements. Effect or potential effect – Inaccurate filing of reports may result in the federal program not being properly monitored, thus resulting in potential noncompliance with program requirements. Questioned costs – Not applicable Context – Out of a population of 1 special report that was required to be submitted during the year under audit (UDS), we selected this 1 report for testing. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable – Not a repeat finding. Recommendation – We recommend management implement an additional level of review by someone with knowledge of the reporting requirements. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions – To ensure compliance with federal reporting standards, the Organization will require a secondary review of all federal reports submitted to granting agencies. The designated secondary reviewer shall be an individual that has strong knowledge of the reporting requirements.
Information on the federal program – Assistance Listing Number 93.224/93.527, Health Center Program Cluster from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Federal Award No. 6 H80CS00581 for project period March 1, 2024 through February 28, 2025. Criteria or specific requirement – Health Centers must comply with federal reporting requirements. Condition – The Organization did not have data to support certain line items reported on the Uniform Data System (UDS) report filed. The amounts reported within table 5 line 8 column b and b2, table 5 line 10a, column b and b2 were not supportable by underlying data, and the amounts reported within table 9E line 1g column a, and line 1q column did not agree to underlying supporting data available. Cause – There was a lack of detailed review of the submitted report by someone with knowledge of the reporting requirements. Effect or potential effect – Inaccurate filing of reports may result in the federal program not being properly monitored, thus resulting in potential noncompliance with program requirements. Questioned costs – Not applicable Context – Out of a population of 1 special report that was required to be submitted during the year under audit (UDS), we selected this 1 report for testing. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable – Not a repeat finding. Recommendation – We recommend management implement an additional level of review by someone with knowledge of the reporting requirements. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions – To ensure compliance with federal reporting standards, the Organization will require a secondary review of all federal reports submitted to granting agencies. The designated secondary reviewer shall be an individual that has strong knowledge of the reporting requirements.
Information on the federal program – Assistance Listing Number 93.224/93.527, Health Center Program Cluster from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Federal Award No. 6 H80CS00581 for project period March 1, 2024 through February 28, 2025. Criteria or specific requirement – Health Centers must comply with federal reporting requirements. Condition – The Organization did not have data to support certain line items reported on the Uniform Data System (UDS) report filed. The amounts reported within table 5 line 8 column b and b2, table 5 line 10a, column b and b2 were not supportable by underlying data, and the amounts reported within table 9E line 1g column a, and line 1q column did not agree to underlying supporting data available. Cause – There was a lack of detailed review of the submitted report by someone with knowledge of the reporting requirements. Effect or potential effect – Inaccurate filing of reports may result in the federal program not being properly monitored, thus resulting in potential noncompliance with program requirements. Questioned costs – Not applicable Context – Out of a population of 1 special report that was required to be submitted during the year under audit (UDS), we selected this 1 report for testing. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable – Not a repeat finding. Recommendation – We recommend management implement an additional level of review by someone with knowledge of the reporting requirements. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions – To ensure compliance with federal reporting standards, the Organization will require a secondary review of all federal reports submitted to granting agencies. The designated secondary reviewer shall be an individual that has strong knowledge of the reporting requirements.