Audit 365826

FY End
2025-03-31
Total Expended
$56.78M
Findings
2
Programs
5
Year: 2025 Accepted: 2025-09-08
Auditor: Smith Marion

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
575878 2025-001 Significant Deficiency Yes N
1152320 2025-001 Significant Deficiency Yes N

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
14.881 Moving to Work Demonstration Program $45.42M Yes 1
14.879 Mainstream Vouchers $6.34M - 0
14.871 Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers $4.46M - 0
14.870 Resident Opportunity and Supportive Services - Service Coordinators $420,138 - 0
14.238 Shelter Plus Care $143,488 - 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
NKUHRGLYVMM8 Jaime Kuczkowski Auditee
8058971058 Chad Porter Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Note 01 - Scope of Presentation Accounting Policies: NOTE 01 - SCOPE OF PRESENTATION The accompanying schedule presents the expenditures incurred (and related awards received) by the Housing Authority of the City of Santa Barbara (the Authority) that are reimbursable under federal programs of federal agencies providing financial assistance and state awards. For the purposes of this schedule, only the portion of program expenditures reimbursable with such federal or state funds is reported in the accompanying schedule. Program expenditures in excess of the maximum federal or state reimbursement authorized or the portion of the program expenditures that were funded with local or other nonfederal funds are excluded from the accompanying schedule. NOTE 02 - BASIS OF ACCOUNTING The expenditures included in the accompanying schedule were reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Expenditures are recognized in the accounting period in which the related liability is incurred. Expenditures reported included any property or equipment acquisitions incurred under the federal program. The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Uniform Guidance, Audit of States, Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations. Therefore, some amounts presented in this schedule may differ from amounts presented in or used in the preparation of the basic financial statements. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: NOTE 03 - INDIRECT COST RATE The Authority elected not to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed in the Uniform Guidance, Section 414. The accompanying schedule presents the expenditures incurred (and related awards received) by the Housing Authority of the City of Santa Barbara (the Authority) that are reimbursable under federal programs of federal agencies providing financial assistance and state awards. For the purposes of this schedule, only the portion of program expenditures reimbursable with such federal or state funds is reported in the accompanying schedule. Program expenditures in excess of the maximum federal or state reimbursement authorized or the portion of the program expenditures that were funded with local or other nonfederal funds are excluded from the accompanying schedule.
Title: Note 02 - Basis of Accounting Accounting Policies: NOTE 01 - SCOPE OF PRESENTATION The accompanying schedule presents the expenditures incurred (and related awards received) by the Housing Authority of the City of Santa Barbara (the Authority) that are reimbursable under federal programs of federal agencies providing financial assistance and state awards. For the purposes of this schedule, only the portion of program expenditures reimbursable with such federal or state funds is reported in the accompanying schedule. Program expenditures in excess of the maximum federal or state reimbursement authorized or the portion of the program expenditures that were funded with local or other nonfederal funds are excluded from the accompanying schedule. NOTE 02 - BASIS OF ACCOUNTING The expenditures included in the accompanying schedule were reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Expenditures are recognized in the accounting period in which the related liability is incurred. Expenditures reported included any property or equipment acquisitions incurred under the federal program. The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Uniform Guidance, Audit of States, Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations. Therefore, some amounts presented in this schedule may differ from amounts presented in or used in the preparation of the basic financial statements. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: NOTE 03 - INDIRECT COST RATE The Authority elected not to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed in the Uniform Guidance, Section 414. The expenditures included in the accompanying schedule were reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Expenditures are recognized in the accounting period in which the related liability is incurred. Expenditures reported included any property or equipment acquisitions incurred under the federal program. The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Uniform Guidance, Audit of States, Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations. Therefore, some amounts presented in this schedule may differ from amounts presented in or used in the preparation of the basic financial statements.
Title: Note 03 - Indirect Cost Rate Accounting Policies: NOTE 01 - SCOPE OF PRESENTATION The accompanying schedule presents the expenditures incurred (and related awards received) by the Housing Authority of the City of Santa Barbara (the Authority) that are reimbursable under federal programs of federal agencies providing financial assistance and state awards. For the purposes of this schedule, only the portion of program expenditures reimbursable with such federal or state funds is reported in the accompanying schedule. Program expenditures in excess of the maximum federal or state reimbursement authorized or the portion of the program expenditures that were funded with local or other nonfederal funds are excluded from the accompanying schedule. NOTE 02 - BASIS OF ACCOUNTING The expenditures included in the accompanying schedule were reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Expenditures are recognized in the accounting period in which the related liability is incurred. Expenditures reported included any property or equipment acquisitions incurred under the federal program. The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Uniform Guidance, Audit of States, Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations. Therefore, some amounts presented in this schedule may differ from amounts presented in or used in the preparation of the basic financial statements. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: NOTE 03 - INDIRECT COST RATE The Authority elected not to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed in the Uniform Guidance, Section 414. The Authority elected not to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed in the Uniform Guidance, Section 414.

Finding Details

HQS Enforcement HUD requires that all units under the Housing Choice Vouchers Program meet specific Housing Quality Standards (HQS). In cases of failed inspections, timely re-inspections are mandatory, and if compliance is not achieved, abatement of Housing Assistance Payments (HAP) or voucher cancellation is required. During the audit, it was noted that in seven (7) instances, a unit that failed its HQS inspection did not undergo a subsequent re-inspection or no inspection was documented. Consequently, the required abatement of HAP or cancellation of the housing voucher was not executed. This finding represents a potentially systemic issue within the Housing Voucher Cluster program, as it was identified in seven (7) files tested out of a sample of eight (8) cases. It highlights a need for more rigorous enforcement and monitoring of HQS compliance. The non-compliance appears to stem from oversight or procedural lapses in the enforcement of HQS within the Housing Voucher Cluster program. This may be due to inadequate training, monitoring, or failure to adhere to established protocols. This non-compliance undermines the integrity of the Housing Choice Vouchers Program and may lead to tenants living in substandard conditions. It also represents a risk of improper use of federal funds and can impact the credibility and effectiveness of the program. Implement more stringent procedures for monitoring HQS compliance, including timely reinspection and enforcement of HAP abatement or voucher cancellation. Enhance training for staff involved in the HQS process to ensure a thorough understanding of compliance requirements. Establish a system of regular audits to identify and rectify lapses in HQS enforcement promptly. The exact monetary impact needs further investigation to determine the amount of HAP that should have been abated for the period of non-compliance. The auditee acknowledges the deficiency in enforcing Housing Quality Standards (HQS) as highlighted in the finding. In response to this issue, the management commits to implementing a comprehensive Corrective Action Plan.
HQS Enforcement HUD requires that all units under the Housing Choice Vouchers Program meet specific Housing Quality Standards (HQS). In cases of failed inspections, timely re-inspections are mandatory, and if compliance is not achieved, abatement of Housing Assistance Payments (HAP) or voucher cancellation is required. During the audit, it was noted that in seven (7) instances, a unit that failed its HQS inspection did not undergo a subsequent re-inspection or no inspection was documented. Consequently, the required abatement of HAP or cancellation of the housing voucher was not executed. This finding represents a potentially systemic issue within the Housing Voucher Cluster program, as it was identified in seven (7) files tested out of a sample of eight (8) cases. It highlights a need for more rigorous enforcement and monitoring of HQS compliance. The non-compliance appears to stem from oversight or procedural lapses in the enforcement of HQS within the Housing Voucher Cluster program. This may be due to inadequate training, monitoring, or failure to adhere to established protocols. This non-compliance undermines the integrity of the Housing Choice Vouchers Program and may lead to tenants living in substandard conditions. It also represents a risk of improper use of federal funds and can impact the credibility and effectiveness of the program. Implement more stringent procedures for monitoring HQS compliance, including timely reinspection and enforcement of HAP abatement or voucher cancellation. Enhance training for staff involved in the HQS process to ensure a thorough understanding of compliance requirements. Establish a system of regular audits to identify and rectify lapses in HQS enforcement promptly. The exact monetary impact needs further investigation to determine the amount of HAP that should have been abated for the period of non-compliance. The auditee acknowledges the deficiency in enforcing Housing Quality Standards (HQS) as highlighted in the finding. In response to this issue, the management commits to implementing a comprehensive Corrective Action Plan.