Audit 364976

FY End
2025-02-28
Total Expended
$3.15M
Findings
4
Programs
2
Organization: Village of Marion (MI)
Year: 2025 Accepted: 2025-08-26
Auditor: Uhy LLP

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
574697 2025-005 - - A
574698 2025-006 Material Weakness - I
1151139 2025-005 - - A
1151140 2025-006 Material Weakness - I

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
66.468 Capitalization Grants for Drinking Water State Revolving Funds $3.13M Yes 2
21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds $19,946 - 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
H8XEJJM1CN39 Flora Grundy Auditee
2317436801 Derek Graham Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Basis of Presentation Accounting Policies: See Additional Notes tab for significant policies used in preparing the SEFA De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Village did not charge any indirect costs The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the “Schedule”) includes the federal grant activity of Village of Marion (the "Village") for the year ended February 28, 2025. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the “Uniform Guidance”). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the Village, it is not intended to, and does not, present the financial position, changes in net position, or cash flows of the Village.
Title: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Accounting Policies: See Additional Notes tab for significant policies used in preparing the SEFA De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Village did not charge any indirect costs Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures reported on the schedule are recognized following the cost principles contained in Subpart E of the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. For purposes of charging indirect costs to federal awards, the Village has not elected to use the 10% de minimis cost rate. The Village does not pass through federal funds to sub recipients.
Title: Balance of Federal Loan Program Accounting Policies: See Additional Notes tab for significant policies used in preparing the SEFA De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Village did not charge any indirect costs See the Notes to the SEFA table instead
Title: Reconciliation of Revenues with Expenditures for Federal Financial Assistance Programs Accounting Policies: See Additional Notes tab for significant policies used in preparing the SEFA De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Village did not charge any indirect costs See the Notes to the SEFA table instead

Finding Details

2025-005 Program Title: Capitalization Grants for Drinking Water State Revolving Fund Assistance Listing Number: 66.468 Federal Agency: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Federal Award Number: N/A Federal Award Year: Fiscal year 2025 Pass-Through Entities: Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy (EGLE) Type of Compliance: Immaterial noncompliance Criteria: The Uniform Guidance requires a non-federal entity that has expended federal awards for a grant awarded to have written policies pertaining to allowability of costs, payments, and compensation charged to federal programs (§200.302(7)). Condition: A formal written policy covering allowable costs, conflict of interest and procurement has not been updated in accordance with the Uniform Guidance. Cause: This condition appears to be the result of a time lag in identifying the requirement and developing a plan for compliance. Effect: The lack of written policies could result in costs or transactions that would be nonallowable for a federal program. Questioned Costs: None. Perspective Information: The finding appears to be an isolated instance. No sampling was necessary to determine this finding. Identification of Repeat Findings: None Recommendations: The Village Council should, as soon as possible, adopt written policies, as required by Uniform Guidance, for allowable costs, conflict of interest and procurement. Views of Responsible Officials: The Village does not believe that there were any actual nonallowable costs or transactions because of the lack of written policies as required by Uniform Guidance. However, corrective action will be done whereby the written policies will be prepared and adopted for the future.
2024-006 Suspension and Debarment Program Title: Capitalization Grants for Drinking Water State Revolving Fund Assistance Listing Number: 66.468 Federal Agency: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Federal Award Number: N/A Federal Award Year: Fiscal year 2025 Pass-Through Entities: Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy (EGLE) Type of Compliance: Material weakness and material noncompliance Criteria: Per 2 CRF Section 180.300, recipients must have procedures in place for verifying that an entity with which they plan to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded. Condition: The Village had no control procedures in place for ensuring contractors performing work on federal projects were not suspended or debarred. Cause: There were no controls in place to ensure vendors are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. Effect: The Village risks entering into contracts with excluded parties, which would be considered noncompliance with the Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs: None. Although there was no verification that the contractors were not suspended or debarred prior to the audit, a subsequent check was performed to verify the vendor was not suspended or debarred. Perspective Information: The finding appears to be an isolated instance. No sampling was necessary to determine this finding. Identification of Repeat Findings: None Recommendations: The Village Council should, as soon as possible, update its policies to include controls for verifying contractors are not suspended or debarred. Although this is a requirement only for contracts involving the use of federal funds, the Village may want to update its policies over all procurements, not just those related to federally funded projects. Views of Responsible Officials: The Village’s engineer, Fleis & Vandenbrink, has searched the state procurement office webpage to check if any vendor for a federal project is on the debarment list, which they are not. In the future, as part of Federal Grant Funding implementation, the Village will ensure that vendors are not debarred or suspended from federal funding awards, whether they check the list themselves or have the engineer do it as part of the bidding process and retain proper documentation.
2025-005 Program Title: Capitalization Grants for Drinking Water State Revolving Fund Assistance Listing Number: 66.468 Federal Agency: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Federal Award Number: N/A Federal Award Year: Fiscal year 2025 Pass-Through Entities: Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy (EGLE) Type of Compliance: Immaterial noncompliance Criteria: The Uniform Guidance requires a non-federal entity that has expended federal awards for a grant awarded to have written policies pertaining to allowability of costs, payments, and compensation charged to federal programs (§200.302(7)). Condition: A formal written policy covering allowable costs, conflict of interest and procurement has not been updated in accordance with the Uniform Guidance. Cause: This condition appears to be the result of a time lag in identifying the requirement and developing a plan for compliance. Effect: The lack of written policies could result in costs or transactions that would be nonallowable for a federal program. Questioned Costs: None. Perspective Information: The finding appears to be an isolated instance. No sampling was necessary to determine this finding. Identification of Repeat Findings: None Recommendations: The Village Council should, as soon as possible, adopt written policies, as required by Uniform Guidance, for allowable costs, conflict of interest and procurement. Views of Responsible Officials: The Village does not believe that there were any actual nonallowable costs or transactions because of the lack of written policies as required by Uniform Guidance. However, corrective action will be done whereby the written policies will be prepared and adopted for the future.
2024-006 Suspension and Debarment Program Title: Capitalization Grants for Drinking Water State Revolving Fund Assistance Listing Number: 66.468 Federal Agency: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Federal Award Number: N/A Federal Award Year: Fiscal year 2025 Pass-Through Entities: Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy (EGLE) Type of Compliance: Material weakness and material noncompliance Criteria: Per 2 CRF Section 180.300, recipients must have procedures in place for verifying that an entity with which they plan to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded. Condition: The Village had no control procedures in place for ensuring contractors performing work on federal projects were not suspended or debarred. Cause: There were no controls in place to ensure vendors are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. Effect: The Village risks entering into contracts with excluded parties, which would be considered noncompliance with the Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs: None. Although there was no verification that the contractors were not suspended or debarred prior to the audit, a subsequent check was performed to verify the vendor was not suspended or debarred. Perspective Information: The finding appears to be an isolated instance. No sampling was necessary to determine this finding. Identification of Repeat Findings: None Recommendations: The Village Council should, as soon as possible, update its policies to include controls for verifying contractors are not suspended or debarred. Although this is a requirement only for contracts involving the use of federal funds, the Village may want to update its policies over all procurements, not just those related to federally funded projects. Views of Responsible Officials: The Village’s engineer, Fleis & Vandenbrink, has searched the state procurement office webpage to check if any vendor for a federal project is on the debarment list, which they are not. In the future, as part of Federal Grant Funding implementation, the Village will ensure that vendors are not debarred or suspended from federal funding awards, whether they check the list themselves or have the engineer do it as part of the bidding process and retain proper documentation.