Audit 364777

FY End
2024-06-30
Total Expended
$1.52M
Findings
8
Programs
10
Year: 2024 Accepted: 2025-08-22

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
574438 2024-002 Material Weakness - L
574439 2024-002 Material Weakness - L
574440 2024-002 Material Weakness - L
574441 2024-002 Material Weakness - L
1150880 2024-002 Material Weakness - L
1150881 2024-002 Material Weakness - L
1150882 2024-002 Material Weakness - L
1150883 2024-002 Material Weakness - L

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
84.010 Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies $373,076 - 0
84.027 Special Education_grants to States $370,888 - 0
10.555 National School Lunch Program $122,899 Yes 1
10.553 School Breakfast Program $108,827 Yes 1
84.367 Improving Teacher Quality State Grants $57,794 - 0
84.424 Student Support and Academic Enrichment Program $20,288 - 0
93.778 Medical Assistance Program $7,654 - 0
10.649 Pandemic Ebt Administrative Costs $653 - 0
84.425 Education Stabilization Fund $0 - 0
84.173 Special Education_preschool Grants $0 - 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
HFK7AYH5LP55 Steven Dolak Auditee
5707842850 Kimberly Stank Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: NOTE 1: REPORTING ENTITY Accounting Policies: Central Columbia School District (the "District") is the reporting entity for financial reporting purposes as defind in Note 1A to the District's basic financial statements. For purposes of preparing the schedules of expenditures of federal awards, the District's reporting entity is the same that was used for financial reporting. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The School District did not use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate. Central Columbia School District (the "District") is the reporting entity for financial reporting purposes as defined in Note 1A to the District's basic financial statements. For purposes of preparing the schedules of expenditures of federal awards, the District's reporting entity is the same that was used for financial reporting.
Title: NOTE 2: BASIS OF ACCOUNTING Accounting Policies: Central Columbia School District (the "District") is the reporting entity for financial reporting purposes as defind in Note 1A to the District's basic financial statements. For purposes of preparing the schedules of expenditures of federal awards, the District's reporting entity is the same that was used for financial reporting. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The School District did not use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate. The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards includes the grant activity of the District and is presented using the accrual basis of accounting, which is described in Note 1C to the District's basic financial statements. The District did not use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate.
Title: NOTE 3: RISK-BASED AUDIT APPROACH Accounting Policies: Central Columbia School District (the "District") is the reporting entity for financial reporting purposes as defind in Note 1A to the District's basic financial statements. For purposes of preparing the schedules of expenditures of federal awards, the District's reporting entity is the same that was used for financial reporting. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The School District did not use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate. The 2024 threshold for determining Type A and Type B programs is $750,000. The School District had no Type A programs. The following Type B program audited as major for coverage: ALN 10.553/10.555 Child Nutrition Cluster. The amount expended under the program audited as a major federal program for the year ended June 30, 2024, totaled $688,038 or 45.3% of total federal awards expended.
Title: NOTE 4: MEDICAL ASSISTANCE Accounting Policies: Central Columbia School District (the "District") is the reporting entity for financial reporting purposes as defind in Note 1A to the District's basic financial statements. For purposes of preparing the schedules of expenditures of federal awards, the District's reporting entity is the same that was used for financial reporting. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The School District did not use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate. Access reimbursement received under AL#93.778, Revenue Code 8810 are classified as fee-for-service revenues and are not recognized as federal awards for the purpose of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards.

Finding Details

Child Nutrition Cluster ALN 10.553/10.555. U.S. Department of Agriculture. Pass-through Pennsylvania Department of Education and Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture. Criteria: 2 CFR part 200 section 303 indicates the District is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control procedures over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the District is managing the Federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition: Three of the three reports selected for testing in the Child Nutrition Cluster did not have sufficient audit evidence to demonstrate they were reviewed and approved prior to submission. There were no instances of noncompliance with reporting requirements related to the reports selected. Cause: The Business Administrator both prepares the reports and submits them directly through the reimbursement system without an independent review being performed. Effect: Internal controls over reporting were not operating effectively. Questioned Costs: No known questioned costs. Recommendation: The District should revise procedures to ensure the data entered into the claim for reimbursement is reviewed for accuracy prior to the report being submitted. Evidence of the approval of submission should be documented in writing, such as with an initial, to demonstrate that the review of the information has been performed. Management's response: Going forward the Business Administrator will prepare the reports for submission. Prior to submitting the reports through the reimbursement system, a second individual will review the information entered. Upon statisfactory completion of the review, the second individual will acknowledge review by initialing and dating the document(s).
Child Nutrition Cluster ALN 10.553/10.555. U.S. Department of Agriculture. Pass-through Pennsylvania Department of Education and Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture. Criteria: 2 CFR part 200 section 303 indicates the District is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control procedures over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the District is managing the Federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition: Three of the three reports selected for testing in the Child Nutrition Cluster did not have sufficient audit evidence to demonstrate they were reviewed and approved prior to submission. There were no instances of noncompliance with reporting requirements related to the reports selected. Cause: The Business Administrator both prepares the reports and submits them directly through the reimbursement system without an independent review being performed. Effect: Internal controls over reporting were not operating effectively. Questioned Costs: No known questioned costs. Recommendation: The District should revise procedures to ensure the data entered into the claim for reimbursement is reviewed for accuracy prior to the report being submitted. Evidence of the approval of submission should be documented in writing, such as with an initial, to demonstrate that the review of the information has been performed. Management's response: Going forward the Business Administrator will prepare the reports for submission. Prior to submitting the reports through the reimbursement system, a second individual will review the information entered. Upon statisfactory completion of the review, the second individual will acknowledge review by initialing and dating the document(s).
Child Nutrition Cluster ALN 10.553/10.555. U.S. Department of Agriculture. Pass-through Pennsylvania Department of Education and Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture. Criteria: 2 CFR part 200 section 303 indicates the District is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control procedures over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the District is managing the Federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition: Three of the three reports selected for testing in the Child Nutrition Cluster did not have sufficient audit evidence to demonstrate they were reviewed and approved prior to submission. There were no instances of noncompliance with reporting requirements related to the reports selected. Cause: The Business Administrator both prepares the reports and submits them directly through the reimbursement system without an independent review being performed. Effect: Internal controls over reporting were not operating effectively. Questioned Costs: No known questioned costs. Recommendation: The District should revise procedures to ensure the data entered into the claim for reimbursement is reviewed for accuracy prior to the report being submitted. Evidence of the approval of submission should be documented in writing, such as with an initial, to demonstrate that the review of the information has been performed. Management's response: Going forward the Business Administrator will prepare the reports for submission. Prior to submitting the reports through the reimbursement system, a second individual will review the information entered. Upon statisfactory completion of the review, the second individual will acknowledge review by initialing and dating the document(s).
Child Nutrition Cluster ALN 10.553/10.555. U.S. Department of Agriculture. Pass-through Pennsylvania Department of Education and Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture. Criteria: 2 CFR part 200 section 303 indicates the District is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control procedures over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the District is managing the Federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition: Three of the three reports selected for testing in the Child Nutrition Cluster did not have sufficient audit evidence to demonstrate they were reviewed and approved prior to submission. There were no instances of noncompliance with reporting requirements related to the reports selected. Cause: The Business Administrator both prepares the reports and submits them directly through the reimbursement system without an independent review being performed. Effect: Internal controls over reporting were not operating effectively. Questioned Costs: No known questioned costs. Recommendation: The District should revise procedures to ensure the data entered into the claim for reimbursement is reviewed for accuracy prior to the report being submitted. Evidence of the approval of submission should be documented in writing, such as with an initial, to demonstrate that the review of the information has been performed. Management's response: Going forward the Business Administrator will prepare the reports for submission. Prior to submitting the reports through the reimbursement system, a second individual will review the information entered. Upon statisfactory completion of the review, the second individual will acknowledge review by initialing and dating the document(s).
Child Nutrition Cluster ALN 10.553/10.555. U.S. Department of Agriculture. Pass-through Pennsylvania Department of Education and Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture. Criteria: 2 CFR part 200 section 303 indicates the District is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control procedures over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the District is managing the Federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition: Three of the three reports selected for testing in the Child Nutrition Cluster did not have sufficient audit evidence to demonstrate they were reviewed and approved prior to submission. There were no instances of noncompliance with reporting requirements related to the reports selected. Cause: The Business Administrator both prepares the reports and submits them directly through the reimbursement system without an independent review being performed. Effect: Internal controls over reporting were not operating effectively. Questioned Costs: No known questioned costs. Recommendation: The District should revise procedures to ensure the data entered into the claim for reimbursement is reviewed for accuracy prior to the report being submitted. Evidence of the approval of submission should be documented in writing, such as with an initial, to demonstrate that the review of the information has been performed. Management's response: Going forward the Business Administrator will prepare the reports for submission. Prior to submitting the reports through the reimbursement system, a second individual will review the information entered. Upon statisfactory completion of the review, the second individual will acknowledge review by initialing and dating the document(s).
Child Nutrition Cluster ALN 10.553/10.555. U.S. Department of Agriculture. Pass-through Pennsylvania Department of Education and Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture. Criteria: 2 CFR part 200 section 303 indicates the District is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control procedures over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the District is managing the Federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition: Three of the three reports selected for testing in the Child Nutrition Cluster did not have sufficient audit evidence to demonstrate they were reviewed and approved prior to submission. There were no instances of noncompliance with reporting requirements related to the reports selected. Cause: The Business Administrator both prepares the reports and submits them directly through the reimbursement system without an independent review being performed. Effect: Internal controls over reporting were not operating effectively. Questioned Costs: No known questioned costs. Recommendation: The District should revise procedures to ensure the data entered into the claim for reimbursement is reviewed for accuracy prior to the report being submitted. Evidence of the approval of submission should be documented in writing, such as with an initial, to demonstrate that the review of the information has been performed. Management's response: Going forward the Business Administrator will prepare the reports for submission. Prior to submitting the reports through the reimbursement system, a second individual will review the information entered. Upon statisfactory completion of the review, the second individual will acknowledge review by initialing and dating the document(s).
Child Nutrition Cluster ALN 10.553/10.555. U.S. Department of Agriculture. Pass-through Pennsylvania Department of Education and Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture. Criteria: 2 CFR part 200 section 303 indicates the District is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control procedures over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the District is managing the Federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition: Three of the three reports selected for testing in the Child Nutrition Cluster did not have sufficient audit evidence to demonstrate they were reviewed and approved prior to submission. There were no instances of noncompliance with reporting requirements related to the reports selected. Cause: The Business Administrator both prepares the reports and submits them directly through the reimbursement system without an independent review being performed. Effect: Internal controls over reporting were not operating effectively. Questioned Costs: No known questioned costs. Recommendation: The District should revise procedures to ensure the data entered into the claim for reimbursement is reviewed for accuracy prior to the report being submitted. Evidence of the approval of submission should be documented in writing, such as with an initial, to demonstrate that the review of the information has been performed. Management's response: Going forward the Business Administrator will prepare the reports for submission. Prior to submitting the reports through the reimbursement system, a second individual will review the information entered. Upon statisfactory completion of the review, the second individual will acknowledge review by initialing and dating the document(s).
Child Nutrition Cluster ALN 10.553/10.555. U.S. Department of Agriculture. Pass-through Pennsylvania Department of Education and Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture. Criteria: 2 CFR part 200 section 303 indicates the District is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control procedures over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the District is managing the Federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition: Three of the three reports selected for testing in the Child Nutrition Cluster did not have sufficient audit evidence to demonstrate they were reviewed and approved prior to submission. There were no instances of noncompliance with reporting requirements related to the reports selected. Cause: The Business Administrator both prepares the reports and submits them directly through the reimbursement system without an independent review being performed. Effect: Internal controls over reporting were not operating effectively. Questioned Costs: No known questioned costs. Recommendation: The District should revise procedures to ensure the data entered into the claim for reimbursement is reviewed for accuracy prior to the report being submitted. Evidence of the approval of submission should be documented in writing, such as with an initial, to demonstrate that the review of the information has been performed. Management's response: Going forward the Business Administrator will prepare the reports for submission. Prior to submitting the reports through the reimbursement system, a second individual will review the information entered. Upon statisfactory completion of the review, the second individual will acknowledge review by initialing and dating the document(s).