Audit 364399

FY End
2024-06-30
Total Expended
$1.01M
Findings
4
Programs
1
Year: 2024 Accepted: 2025-08-18
Auditor: Denman CPA LLP

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
573736 2024-001 Significant Deficiency Yes P
573737 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes P
1150178 2024-001 Significant Deficiency Yes P
1150179 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes P

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
14.871 Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers $1.01M Yes 2

Contacts

Name Title Type
CJWSTMPYVNQ6 Nicole Christopher Auditee
3194835079 Stephen Bruner Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Basis of Presentation Accounting Policies: Basis of Presentation The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the Schedule) includes the federal award activity of the Authority under programs of the federal government for the year ended June 30, 2024. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2, U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the Authority, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in financial position, or cash flows of the Authority. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Expenditures reported in the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Authority has elected not to use the 10 percent de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the Schedule) includes the federal award activity of the Authority under programs of the federal government for the year ended June 30, 2024. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2, U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the Authority, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in financial position, or cash flows of the Authority.
Title: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Accounting Policies: Basis of Presentation The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the Schedule) includes the federal award activity of the Authority under programs of the federal government for the year ended June 30, 2024. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2, U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the Authority, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in financial position, or cash flows of the Authority. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Expenditures reported in the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Authority has elected not to use the 10 percent de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance. Expenditures reported in the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement.
Title: Indirect Cost Rate Accounting Policies: Basis of Presentation The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the Schedule) includes the federal award activity of the Authority under programs of the federal government for the year ended June 30, 2024. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2, U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the Authority, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in financial position, or cash flows of the Authority. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Expenditures reported in the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Authority has elected not to use the 10 percent de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance. The Authority has elected not to use the 10 percent de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance.

Finding Details

Finding 2024-001: External Financial Reporting Significant Deficiency Criteria: Properly designed policies and procedures and implementation of the policies and procedures are an integral part of ensuring the reliability and accuracy of the Authority’s financial statements. Condition: The Authority’s accounting staff does not possess the necessary expertise to ensure that certain financial statement reporting and disclosure requirements of generally accepted accounting principles are appropriately addressed. Adjustments were made to the financial statement amounts and disclosures to properly address these requirements. Cause: The operating budget for an organization the size of the Authority does not allow for hiring someone with this expertise. Effect: The financial statements prepared by management will be incomplete without adequate footnote disclosures. Recommendation: Resolving the deficiency would require the Authority to hire additional accounting staff who possess the necessary expertise required for preparation of external financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. This solution may result in a substantial increase in operating costs. The other action would be to accept that by definition there is a significant deficiency in internal control and cost of eliminating that deficiency would exceed its benefit. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The Authority has determined that the operating budget cannot handle the additional expense of hiring someone with this expertise, and the cost of eliminating the deficiency would exceed it benefit.. Conclusion Response accepted.
Significant Deficiency Criteria: Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining internal control. A good system of internal control provides for adequate segregation of duties so no one individual handles a transaction from its inception to completion. In order to maintain proper internal control, duties should be segregated so the authorization, custody and recording of transactions are not under the control of the same employee. This segregation of duties helps prevent losses from employee error or dishonesty and maximizes the accuracy of the Authority’s financial statements. Condition: An adequate segregation of duties was not present related to the accounting and financial duties. As a result, many of those aspects of internal control procedures which rely upon an adequate segregation of duties are, for all practical purposes, missing. Cause: The operating budget for an organization the size of the Authority does not allow for the hiring of additional accounting personnel to further segregate incompatible accounting duties. Effect: One individual may have complete control over certain transactions without adequate checks and balances or reviews being performed. This could adversely affect the Authority’s ability to prevent, or detect and correct, misstatements, errors or misappropriation on a timely basis by employees in the normal course of performing their assigned functions. Recommendation: We realize segregation of duties is difficult with a limited number of employees. However, the Authority should review its procedures to obtain the maximum internal control possible under the circumstances, utilizing currently available staff to provide additional control through review of financial transactions, reconciliations and reports. These independent reviews should be documented by the signature or initials of the reviewer and the date of the review. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The Authority will continue to monitor its policies and procedures in an effort to improve control efficiencies, however, at this time, the Authority has determined that the cost of eliminating the deficiency would exceed its benefit. Conclusion Response accepted. INSTANCES OF NONCOMPLIANCE No matters noted.
Finding 2024-001: External Financial Reporting Significant Deficiency Criteria: Properly designed policies and procedures and implementation of the policies and procedures are an integral part of ensuring the reliability and accuracy of the Authority’s financial statements. Condition: The Authority’s accounting staff does not possess the necessary expertise to ensure that certain financial statement reporting and disclosure requirements of generally accepted accounting principles are appropriately addressed. Adjustments were made to the financial statement amounts and disclosures to properly address these requirements. Cause: The operating budget for an organization the size of the Authority does not allow for hiring someone with this expertise. Effect: The financial statements prepared by management will be incomplete without adequate footnote disclosures. Recommendation: Resolving the deficiency would require the Authority to hire additional accounting staff who possess the necessary expertise required for preparation of external financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. This solution may result in a substantial increase in operating costs. The other action would be to accept that by definition there is a significant deficiency in internal control and cost of eliminating that deficiency would exceed its benefit. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The Authority has determined that the operating budget cannot handle the additional expense of hiring someone with this expertise, and the cost of eliminating the deficiency would exceed it benefit.. Conclusion Response accepted.
Significant Deficiency Criteria: Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining internal control. A good system of internal control provides for adequate segregation of duties so no one individual handles a transaction from its inception to completion. In order to maintain proper internal control, duties should be segregated so the authorization, custody and recording of transactions are not under the control of the same employee. This segregation of duties helps prevent losses from employee error or dishonesty and maximizes the accuracy of the Authority’s financial statements. Condition: An adequate segregation of duties was not present related to the accounting and financial duties. As a result, many of those aspects of internal control procedures which rely upon an adequate segregation of duties are, for all practical purposes, missing. Cause: The operating budget for an organization the size of the Authority does not allow for the hiring of additional accounting personnel to further segregate incompatible accounting duties. Effect: One individual may have complete control over certain transactions without adequate checks and balances or reviews being performed. This could adversely affect the Authority’s ability to prevent, or detect and correct, misstatements, errors or misappropriation on a timely basis by employees in the normal course of performing their assigned functions. Recommendation: We realize segregation of duties is difficult with a limited number of employees. However, the Authority should review its procedures to obtain the maximum internal control possible under the circumstances, utilizing currently available staff to provide additional control through review of financial transactions, reconciliations and reports. These independent reviews should be documented by the signature or initials of the reviewer and the date of the review. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The Authority will continue to monitor its policies and procedures in an effort to improve control efficiencies, however, at this time, the Authority has determined that the cost of eliminating the deficiency would exceed its benefit. Conclusion Response accepted. INSTANCES OF NONCOMPLIANCE No matters noted.