2024-003
Uniform Guidance and State Single Audit Guidelines Findings
Review of Claim Forms and Expenditure Reconciliation
Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance
Federal Assistance Listing Numbers – 93.778
Federal Agency – Department of Health and Human Services
Federal Program Title – Medicaid Cluster
State Program Title: Various
State ID Number: Various
Pass-Through Numbers(s): Various
Award Period: January 1, 2024 to December 31, 2024
Compliance Requirement
Reporting, Cash Management
Criteria or Specific Requirement
Uniform Guidance requires the reporting of costs or activities as the basis for making payments to providers. Review of claims and expenditures reconciliation is important control over compliance to ensure reports are properly prepared and agree with the County’s actual activity.
Condition
The county did not perform review procedures over claims prior to submission or over monthly reconciliations.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
During reporting testing, it was noted that the County does not have review process in place for reporting.
Cause
There was no review over the monthly claims and monthly expenditures reconciliation prior to submission.
2024-003 (Continued)
Review of Claim Forms and Expenditure Reconciliation
Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance
Effect
Unallowed costs could be claimed, or costs could be double claimed.
Repeat Finding
New finding in 2024.
Recommendation
We recommend that there is an appropriate reviewer of each grant claim and monthly reconciliation.
View of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2024-003
Uniform Guidance and State Single Audit Guidelines Findings
Review of Claim Forms and Expenditure Reconciliation
Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance
Federal Assistance Listing Numbers – 93.778
Federal Agency – Department of Health and Human Services
Federal Program Title – Medicaid Cluster
State Program Title: Various
State ID Number: Various
Pass-Through Numbers(s): Various
Award Period: January 1, 2024 to December 31, 2024
Compliance Requirement
Reporting, Cash Management
Criteria or Specific Requirement
Uniform Guidance requires the reporting of costs or activities as the basis for making payments to providers. Review of claims and expenditures reconciliation is important control over compliance to ensure reports are properly prepared and agree with the County’s actual activity.
Condition
The county did not perform review procedures over claims prior to submission or over monthly reconciliations.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
During reporting testing, it was noted that the County does not have review process in place for reporting.
Cause
There was no review over the monthly claims and monthly expenditures reconciliation prior to submission.
2024-003 (Continued)
Review of Claim Forms and Expenditure Reconciliation
Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance
Effect
Unallowed costs could be claimed, or costs could be double claimed.
Repeat Finding
New finding in 2024.
Recommendation
We recommend that there is an appropriate reviewer of each grant claim and monthly reconciliation.
View of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2024-003
Uniform Guidance and State Single Audit Guidelines Findings
Review of Claim Forms and Expenditure Reconciliation
Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance
Federal Assistance Listing Numbers – 93.778
Federal Agency – Department of Health and Human Services
Federal Program Title – Medicaid Cluster
State Program Title: Various
State ID Number: Various
Pass-Through Numbers(s): Various
Award Period: January 1, 2024 to December 31, 2024
Compliance Requirement
Reporting, Cash Management
Criteria or Specific Requirement
Uniform Guidance requires the reporting of costs or activities as the basis for making payments to providers. Review of claims and expenditures reconciliation is important control over compliance to ensure reports are properly prepared and agree with the County’s actual activity.
Condition
The county did not perform review procedures over claims prior to submission or over monthly reconciliations.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
During reporting testing, it was noted that the County does not have review process in place for reporting.
Cause
There was no review over the monthly claims and monthly expenditures reconciliation prior to submission.
2024-003 (Continued)
Review of Claim Forms and Expenditure Reconciliation
Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance
Effect
Unallowed costs could be claimed, or costs could be double claimed.
Repeat Finding
New finding in 2024.
Recommendation
We recommend that there is an appropriate reviewer of each grant claim and monthly reconciliation.
View of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2024-003
Uniform Guidance and State Single Audit Guidelines Findings
Review of Claim Forms and Expenditure Reconciliation
Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance
Federal Assistance Listing Numbers – 93.778
Federal Agency – Department of Health and Human Services
Federal Program Title – Medicaid Cluster
State Program Title: Various
State ID Number: Various
Pass-Through Numbers(s): Various
Award Period: January 1, 2024 to December 31, 2024
Compliance Requirement
Reporting, Cash Management
Criteria or Specific Requirement
Uniform Guidance requires the reporting of costs or activities as the basis for making payments to providers. Review of claims and expenditures reconciliation is important control over compliance to ensure reports are properly prepared and agree with the County’s actual activity.
Condition
The county did not perform review procedures over claims prior to submission or over monthly reconciliations.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
During reporting testing, it was noted that the County does not have review process in place for reporting.
Cause
There was no review over the monthly claims and monthly expenditures reconciliation prior to submission.
2024-003 (Continued)
Review of Claim Forms and Expenditure Reconciliation
Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance
Effect
Unallowed costs could be claimed, or costs could be double claimed.
Repeat Finding
New finding in 2024.
Recommendation
We recommend that there is an appropriate reviewer of each grant claim and monthly reconciliation.
View of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2024-003
Uniform Guidance and State Single Audit Guidelines Findings
Review of Claim Forms and Expenditure Reconciliation
Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance
Federal Assistance Listing Numbers – 93.778
Federal Agency – Department of Health and Human Services
Federal Program Title – Medicaid Cluster
State Program Title: Various
State ID Number: Various
Pass-Through Numbers(s): Various
Award Period: January 1, 2024 to December 31, 2024
Compliance Requirement
Reporting, Cash Management
Criteria or Specific Requirement
Uniform Guidance requires the reporting of costs or activities as the basis for making payments to providers. Review of claims and expenditures reconciliation is important control over compliance to ensure reports are properly prepared and agree with the County’s actual activity.
Condition
The county did not perform review procedures over claims prior to submission or over monthly reconciliations.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
During reporting testing, it was noted that the County does not have review process in place for reporting.
Cause
There was no review over the monthly claims and monthly expenditures reconciliation prior to submission.
2024-003 (Continued)
Review of Claim Forms and Expenditure Reconciliation
Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance
Effect
Unallowed costs could be claimed, or costs could be double claimed.
Repeat Finding
New finding in 2024.
Recommendation
We recommend that there is an appropriate reviewer of each grant claim and monthly reconciliation.
View of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2024-003
Uniform Guidance and State Single Audit Guidelines Findings
Review of Claim Forms and Expenditure Reconciliation
Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance
Federal Assistance Listing Numbers – 93.778
Federal Agency – Department of Health and Human Services
Federal Program Title – Medicaid Cluster
State Program Title: Various
State ID Number: Various
Pass-Through Numbers(s): Various
Award Period: January 1, 2024 to December 31, 2024
Compliance Requirement
Reporting, Cash Management
Criteria or Specific Requirement
Uniform Guidance requires the reporting of costs or activities as the basis for making payments to providers. Review of claims and expenditures reconciliation is important control over compliance to ensure reports are properly prepared and agree with the County’s actual activity.
Condition
The county did not perform review procedures over claims prior to submission or over monthly reconciliations.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
During reporting testing, it was noted that the County does not have review process in place for reporting.
Cause
There was no review over the monthly claims and monthly expenditures reconciliation prior to submission.
2024-003 (Continued)
Review of Claim Forms and Expenditure Reconciliation
Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance
Effect
Unallowed costs could be claimed, or costs could be double claimed.
Repeat Finding
New finding in 2024.
Recommendation
We recommend that there is an appropriate reviewer of each grant claim and monthly reconciliation.
View of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2024-003
Uniform Guidance and State Single Audit Guidelines Findings
Review of Claim Forms and Expenditure Reconciliation
Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance
Federal Assistance Listing Numbers – 93.778
Federal Agency – Department of Health and Human Services
Federal Program Title – Medicaid Cluster
State Program Title: Various
State ID Number: Various
Pass-Through Numbers(s): Various
Award Period: January 1, 2024 to December 31, 2024
Compliance Requirement
Reporting, Cash Management
Criteria or Specific Requirement
Uniform Guidance requires the reporting of costs or activities as the basis for making payments to providers. Review of claims and expenditures reconciliation is important control over compliance to ensure reports are properly prepared and agree with the County’s actual activity.
Condition
The county did not perform review procedures over claims prior to submission or over monthly reconciliations.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
During reporting testing, it was noted that the County does not have review process in place for reporting.
Cause
There was no review over the monthly claims and monthly expenditures reconciliation prior to submission.
2024-003 (Continued)
Review of Claim Forms and Expenditure Reconciliation
Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance
Effect
Unallowed costs could be claimed, or costs could be double claimed.
Repeat Finding
New finding in 2024.
Recommendation
We recommend that there is an appropriate reviewer of each grant claim and monthly reconciliation.
View of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2024-003
Uniform Guidance and State Single Audit Guidelines Findings
Review of Claim Forms and Expenditure Reconciliation
Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance
Federal Assistance Listing Numbers – 93.778
Federal Agency – Department of Health and Human Services
Federal Program Title – Medicaid Cluster
State Program Title: Various
State ID Number: Various
Pass-Through Numbers(s): Various
Award Period: January 1, 2024 to December 31, 2024
Compliance Requirement
Reporting, Cash Management
Criteria or Specific Requirement
Uniform Guidance requires the reporting of costs or activities as the basis for making payments to providers. Review of claims and expenditures reconciliation is important control over compliance to ensure reports are properly prepared and agree with the County’s actual activity.
Condition
The county did not perform review procedures over claims prior to submission or over monthly reconciliations.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
During reporting testing, it was noted that the County does not have review process in place for reporting.
Cause
There was no review over the monthly claims and monthly expenditures reconciliation prior to submission.
2024-003 (Continued)
Review of Claim Forms and Expenditure Reconciliation
Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance
Effect
Unallowed costs could be claimed, or costs could be double claimed.
Repeat Finding
New finding in 2024.
Recommendation
We recommend that there is an appropriate reviewer of each grant claim and monthly reconciliation.
View of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2024-003
Uniform Guidance and State Single Audit Guidelines Findings
Review of Claim Forms and Expenditure Reconciliation
Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance
Federal Assistance Listing Numbers – 93.778
Federal Agency – Department of Health and Human Services
Federal Program Title – Medicaid Cluster
State Program Title: Various
State ID Number: Various
Pass-Through Numbers(s): Various
Award Period: January 1, 2024 to December 31, 2024
Compliance Requirement
Reporting, Cash Management
Criteria or Specific Requirement
Uniform Guidance requires the reporting of costs or activities as the basis for making payments to providers. Review of claims and expenditures reconciliation is important control over compliance to ensure reports are properly prepared and agree with the County’s actual activity.
Condition
The county did not perform review procedures over claims prior to submission or over monthly reconciliations.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
During reporting testing, it was noted that the County does not have review process in place for reporting.
Cause
There was no review over the monthly claims and monthly expenditures reconciliation prior to submission.
2024-003 (Continued)
Review of Claim Forms and Expenditure Reconciliation
Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance
Effect
Unallowed costs could be claimed, or costs could be double claimed.
Repeat Finding
New finding in 2024.
Recommendation
We recommend that there is an appropriate reviewer of each grant claim and monthly reconciliation.
View of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2024-003
Uniform Guidance and State Single Audit Guidelines Findings
Review of Claim Forms and Expenditure Reconciliation
Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance
Federal Assistance Listing Numbers – 93.778
Federal Agency – Department of Health and Human Services
Federal Program Title – Medicaid Cluster
State Program Title: Various
State ID Number: Various
Pass-Through Numbers(s): Various
Award Period: January 1, 2024 to December 31, 2024
Compliance Requirement
Reporting, Cash Management
Criteria or Specific Requirement
Uniform Guidance requires the reporting of costs or activities as the basis for making payments to providers. Review of claims and expenditures reconciliation is important control over compliance to ensure reports are properly prepared and agree with the County’s actual activity.
Condition
The county did not perform review procedures over claims prior to submission or over monthly reconciliations.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
During reporting testing, it was noted that the County does not have review process in place for reporting.
Cause
There was no review over the monthly claims and monthly expenditures reconciliation prior to submission.
2024-003 (Continued)
Review of Claim Forms and Expenditure Reconciliation
Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance
Effect
Unallowed costs could be claimed, or costs could be double claimed.
Repeat Finding
New finding in 2024.
Recommendation
We recommend that there is an appropriate reviewer of each grant claim and monthly reconciliation.
View of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2024-003
Uniform Guidance and State Single Audit Guidelines Findings
Review of Claim Forms and Expenditure Reconciliation
Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance
Federal Assistance Listing Numbers – 93.778
Federal Agency – Department of Health and Human Services
Federal Program Title – Medicaid Cluster
State Program Title: Various
State ID Number: Various
Pass-Through Numbers(s): Various
Award Period: January 1, 2024 to December 31, 2024
Compliance Requirement
Reporting, Cash Management
Criteria or Specific Requirement
Uniform Guidance requires the reporting of costs or activities as the basis for making payments to providers. Review of claims and expenditures reconciliation is important control over compliance to ensure reports are properly prepared and agree with the County’s actual activity.
Condition
The county did not perform review procedures over claims prior to submission or over monthly reconciliations.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
During reporting testing, it was noted that the County does not have review process in place for reporting.
Cause
There was no review over the monthly claims and monthly expenditures reconciliation prior to submission.
2024-003 (Continued)
Review of Claim Forms and Expenditure Reconciliation
Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance
Effect
Unallowed costs could be claimed, or costs could be double claimed.
Repeat Finding
New finding in 2024.
Recommendation
We recommend that there is an appropriate reviewer of each grant claim and monthly reconciliation.
View of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2024-003
Uniform Guidance and State Single Audit Guidelines Findings
Review of Claim Forms and Expenditure Reconciliation
Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance
Federal Assistance Listing Numbers – 93.778
Federal Agency – Department of Health and Human Services
Federal Program Title – Medicaid Cluster
State Program Title: Various
State ID Number: Various
Pass-Through Numbers(s): Various
Award Period: January 1, 2024 to December 31, 2024
Compliance Requirement
Reporting, Cash Management
Criteria or Specific Requirement
Uniform Guidance requires the reporting of costs or activities as the basis for making payments to providers. Review of claims and expenditures reconciliation is important control over compliance to ensure reports are properly prepared and agree with the County’s actual activity.
Condition
The county did not perform review procedures over claims prior to submission or over monthly reconciliations.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
During reporting testing, it was noted that the County does not have review process in place for reporting.
Cause
There was no review over the monthly claims and monthly expenditures reconciliation prior to submission.
2024-003 (Continued)
Review of Claim Forms and Expenditure Reconciliation
Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance
Effect
Unallowed costs could be claimed, or costs could be double claimed.
Repeat Finding
New finding in 2024.
Recommendation
We recommend that there is an appropriate reviewer of each grant claim and monthly reconciliation.
View of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition
The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation.
Questioned Costs
None
Context
While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements.
Cause
The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end.
Effect
The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County.
Repeat Finding
The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was
2023-002.
Recommendation
We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary.
Views of Responsible Officials
There is no disagreement with the audit finding.