Audit 363924

FY End
2024-12-31
Total Expended
$3.07M
Findings
144
Programs
27
Organization: Kewaunee County, Wisconsin (WI)
Year: 2024 Accepted: 2025-08-08

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
573043 2024-003 Significant Deficiency - CL
573044 2024-003 Significant Deficiency - CL
573045 2024-003 Significant Deficiency - CL
573046 2024-003 Significant Deficiency - CL
573047 2024-003 Significant Deficiency - CL
573048 2024-003 Significant Deficiency - CL
573049 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
573050 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
573051 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
573052 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
573053 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
573054 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
573055 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
573056 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
573057 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
573058 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
573059 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
573060 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
573061 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
573062 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
573063 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
573064 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
573065 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
573066 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
573067 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
573068 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
573069 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
573070 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
573071 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
573072 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
573073 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
573074 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
573075 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
573076 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
573077 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
573078 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
573079 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
573080 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
573081 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
573082 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
573083 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
573084 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
573085 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
573086 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
573087 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
573088 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
573089 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
573090 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
573091 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
573092 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
573093 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
573094 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
573095 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
573096 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
573097 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
573098 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
573099 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
573100 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
573101 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
573102 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
573103 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
573104 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
573105 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
573106 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
573107 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
573108 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
573109 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
573110 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
573111 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
573112 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
573113 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
573114 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
1149485 2024-003 Significant Deficiency - CL
1149486 2024-003 Significant Deficiency - CL
1149487 2024-003 Significant Deficiency - CL
1149488 2024-003 Significant Deficiency - CL
1149489 2024-003 Significant Deficiency - CL
1149490 2024-003 Significant Deficiency - CL
1149491 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
1149492 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
1149493 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
1149494 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
1149495 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
1149496 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
1149497 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
1149498 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
1149499 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
1149500 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
1149501 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
1149502 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
1149503 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
1149504 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
1149505 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
1149506 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
1149507 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
1149508 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
1149509 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
1149510 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
1149511 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
1149512 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
1149513 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
1149514 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
1149515 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
1149516 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
1149517 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
1149518 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
1149519 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
1149520 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
1149521 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
1149522 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
1149523 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
1149524 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
1149525 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
1149526 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
1149527 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
1149528 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
1149529 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
1149530 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
1149531 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
1149532 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
1149533 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
1149534 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
1149535 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
1149536 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
1149537 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
1149538 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
1149539 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
1149540 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
1149541 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
1149542 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
1149543 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
1149544 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
1149545 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
1149546 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
1149547 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
1149548 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
1149549 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
1149550 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
1149551 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
1149552 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
1149553 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
1149554 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
1149555 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL
1149556 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes BCIL

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
10.561 State Administrative Matching Grants for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program $78,495 - 1
20.616 National Priority Safety Programs $57,956 - 1
93.268 Immunization Cooperative Agreements $50,769 - 1
93.090 Guardianship Assistance $39,286 - 1
93.556 Promoting Safe and Stable Families $38,069 - 1
84.181 Special Education-Grants for Infants and Families $33,435 - 1
93.778 Medical Assistance Program $29,882 Yes 2
93.563 Child Support Enforcement $28,403 - 1
93.069 Public Health Emergency Preparedness $27,126 - 1
93.323 Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases (elc) $25,484 - 1
97.042 Emergency Management Performance Grants $24,525 - 1
93.558 Temporary Assistance for Needy Families $16,552 - 1
93.575 Child Care and Development Block Grant $14,693 - 1
93.658 Foster Care Title IV-E $14,567 - 1
93.994 Maternal and Child Health Services Block Grant to the States $8,302 - 1
10.557 Wic Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children $6,230 - 1
93.958 Block Grants for Community Mental Health Services $5,378 - 1
93.747 Elder Abuse Prevention Interventions Program $5,228 - 1
93.767 Children's Health Insurance Program $4,381 - 1
93.991 Preventive Health and Health Services Block Grant $4,230 - 1
93.959 Block Grants for Prevention and Treatment of Substance Abuse $3,300 - 1
21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds $3,280 - 1
16.607 Bulletproof Vest Partnership Program $2,800 - 1
93.667 Social Services Block Grant $2,377 - 1
20.703 Interagency Hazardous Materials Public Sector Training and Planning Grants $900 - 1
16.710 Public Safety Partnership and Community Policing Grants $318 - 1
93.645 Stephanie Tubbs Jones Child Welfare Services Program $234 - 1

Contacts

Name Title Type
C31JFNYLGD75 Paul Kunesh Auditee
9203887164 Amber Drewieske Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Basis of Presentation Accounting Policies: Revenues and expenditures in the schedules are presented in accordance with the modified accrual basis of accounting and are generally in agreement with revenues and expenditures reported in the County’s 2024 fund financial statements. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance and the State Single Audit Guidelines. Under these principles, certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Accrued revenue at year-end consists of federal and state program expenditures scheduled for reimbursement to the County in the succeeding year while unearned revenue represents advances for federal and state programs that exceed recorded County expenditures. Because of subsequent program adjustments, these amounts may differ from the prior year’s ending balances. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The County has not elected to charge a de minimis rate of 10% of modified total costs. The accompanying schedules of expenditures of federal and state awards for the County are presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) and the State Single Audit Guidelines issued by the Wisconsin Department of Administration. The schedules of expenditures of federal and state awards include all federal and state awards of the County. Because the schedules present only a selected portion of the operations of the County, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net position, or cash flows of the County.
Title: Oversight Agencies Accounting Policies: Revenues and expenditures in the schedules are presented in accordance with the modified accrual basis of accounting and are generally in agreement with revenues and expenditures reported in the County’s 2024 fund financial statements. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance and the State Single Audit Guidelines. Under these principles, certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Accrued revenue at year-end consists of federal and state program expenditures scheduled for reimbursement to the County in the succeeding year while unearned revenue represents advances for federal and state programs that exceed recorded County expenditures. Because of subsequent program adjustments, these amounts may differ from the prior year’s ending balances. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The County has not elected to charge a de minimis rate of 10% of modified total costs. The federal and state oversight agencies for the County are as follows: Federal – U.S. Department of Health and Human Services State – Wisconsin Department of Health Services
Title: Title 19 Medical Assistance Payments Accounting Policies: Revenues and expenditures in the schedules are presented in accordance with the modified accrual basis of accounting and are generally in agreement with revenues and expenditures reported in the County’s 2024 fund financial statements. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance and the State Single Audit Guidelines. Under these principles, certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Accrued revenue at year-end consists of federal and state program expenditures scheduled for reimbursement to the County in the succeeding year while unearned revenue represents advances for federal and state programs that exceed recorded County expenditures. Because of subsequent program adjustments, these amounts may differ from the prior year’s ending balances. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The County has not elected to charge a de minimis rate of 10% of modified total costs. The schedules of expenditures of federal and state awards do not include recorded revenues of $2,075,017 received by the County for Title 19 Medical Assistance programs. The payments are considered a contract for services between the state and the county and therefore are not reported as federal or state awards.
Title: Pass Through Entities Accounting Policies: Revenues and expenditures in the schedules are presented in accordance with the modified accrual basis of accounting and are generally in agreement with revenues and expenditures reported in the County’s 2024 fund financial statements. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance and the State Single Audit Guidelines. Under these principles, certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Accrued revenue at year-end consists of federal and state program expenditures scheduled for reimbursement to the County in the succeeding year while unearned revenue represents advances for federal and state programs that exceed recorded County expenditures. Because of subsequent program adjustments, these amounts may differ from the prior year’s ending balances. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The County has not elected to charge a de minimis rate of 10% of modified total costs. Federal and State awards have been passed through the following entities: GWAAR – Greater Wisconsin Agency on Aging Resources WI DCF – Wisconsin Department of Children and Families WI DHS – Wisconsin Department of Health Services WI DMA – Wisconsin Department of Military Affairs WI DOJ – Wisconsin Department of Justice WI DOT – Wisconsin Department of Transportation
Title: State Direct Payments Accounting Policies: Revenues and expenditures in the schedules are presented in accordance with the modified accrual basis of accounting and are generally in agreement with revenues and expenditures reported in the County’s 2024 fund financial statements. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance and the State Single Audit Guidelines. Under these principles, certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Accrued revenue at year-end consists of federal and state program expenditures scheduled for reimbursement to the County in the succeeding year while unearned revenue represents advances for federal and state programs that exceed recorded County expenditures. Because of subsequent program adjustments, these amounts may differ from the prior year’s ending balances. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The County has not elected to charge a de minimis rate of 10% of modified total costs. Payments made directly to recipients and vendors by the state of Wisconsin under the FoodShare Wisconsin program on behalf of the County are not included in the schedules of expenditures of federal and state awards.
Title: State of Wisconsin Community Aids Reproting System Accounting Policies: Revenues and expenditures in the schedules are presented in accordance with the modified accrual basis of accounting and are generally in agreement with revenues and expenditures reported in the County’s 2024 fund financial statements. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance and the State Single Audit Guidelines. Under these principles, certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Accrued revenue at year-end consists of federal and state program expenditures scheduled for reimbursement to the County in the succeeding year while unearned revenue represents advances for federal and state programs that exceed recorded County expenditures. Because of subsequent program adjustments, these amounts may differ from the prior year’s ending balances. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The County has not elected to charge a de minimis rate of 10% of modified total costs. The Wisconsin Departments of Health Services (DHS) and Children and Families (DCF) utilize the Community Aids Reporting System (CARS) and the System for Payments and Reports of Contracts (SPARC) for reimbursing the County for various federal and state program expenditures. The expenditures reported on the schedules of expenditures of federal and state awards for various DHS & DCF programs agree with the expenditures reported on the June 2025 GEARS for the Human Services and Public Health Departments, and the December 2024 SPARC for Child Support and Child Care programs.

Finding Details

2024-003 Uniform Guidance and State Single Audit Guidelines Findings Review of Claim Forms and Expenditure Reconciliation Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Federal Assistance Listing Numbers – 93.778 Federal Agency – Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program Title – Medicaid Cluster State Program Title: Various State ID Number: Various Pass-Through Numbers(s): Various Award Period: January 1, 2024 to December 31, 2024 Compliance Requirement Reporting, Cash Management Criteria or Specific Requirement Uniform Guidance requires the reporting of costs or activities as the basis for making payments to providers. Review of claims and expenditures reconciliation is important control over compliance to ensure reports are properly prepared and agree with the County’s actual activity. Condition The county did not perform review procedures over claims prior to submission or over monthly reconciliations. Questioned Costs None Context During reporting testing, it was noted that the County does not have review process in place for reporting. Cause There was no review over the monthly claims and monthly expenditures reconciliation prior to submission. 2024-003 (Continued) Review of Claim Forms and Expenditure Reconciliation Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Effect Unallowed costs could be claimed, or costs could be double claimed. Repeat Finding New finding in 2024. Recommendation We recommend that there is an appropriate reviewer of each grant claim and monthly reconciliation. View of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2024-003 Uniform Guidance and State Single Audit Guidelines Findings Review of Claim Forms and Expenditure Reconciliation Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Federal Assistance Listing Numbers – 93.778 Federal Agency – Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program Title – Medicaid Cluster State Program Title: Various State ID Number: Various Pass-Through Numbers(s): Various Award Period: January 1, 2024 to December 31, 2024 Compliance Requirement Reporting, Cash Management Criteria or Specific Requirement Uniform Guidance requires the reporting of costs or activities as the basis for making payments to providers. Review of claims and expenditures reconciliation is important control over compliance to ensure reports are properly prepared and agree with the County’s actual activity. Condition The county did not perform review procedures over claims prior to submission or over monthly reconciliations. Questioned Costs None Context During reporting testing, it was noted that the County does not have review process in place for reporting. Cause There was no review over the monthly claims and monthly expenditures reconciliation prior to submission. 2024-003 (Continued) Review of Claim Forms and Expenditure Reconciliation Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Effect Unallowed costs could be claimed, or costs could be double claimed. Repeat Finding New finding in 2024. Recommendation We recommend that there is an appropriate reviewer of each grant claim and monthly reconciliation. View of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2024-003 Uniform Guidance and State Single Audit Guidelines Findings Review of Claim Forms and Expenditure Reconciliation Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Federal Assistance Listing Numbers – 93.778 Federal Agency – Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program Title – Medicaid Cluster State Program Title: Various State ID Number: Various Pass-Through Numbers(s): Various Award Period: January 1, 2024 to December 31, 2024 Compliance Requirement Reporting, Cash Management Criteria or Specific Requirement Uniform Guidance requires the reporting of costs or activities as the basis for making payments to providers. Review of claims and expenditures reconciliation is important control over compliance to ensure reports are properly prepared and agree with the County’s actual activity. Condition The county did not perform review procedures over claims prior to submission or over monthly reconciliations. Questioned Costs None Context During reporting testing, it was noted that the County does not have review process in place for reporting. Cause There was no review over the monthly claims and monthly expenditures reconciliation prior to submission. 2024-003 (Continued) Review of Claim Forms and Expenditure Reconciliation Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Effect Unallowed costs could be claimed, or costs could be double claimed. Repeat Finding New finding in 2024. Recommendation We recommend that there is an appropriate reviewer of each grant claim and monthly reconciliation. View of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2024-003 Uniform Guidance and State Single Audit Guidelines Findings Review of Claim Forms and Expenditure Reconciliation Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Federal Assistance Listing Numbers – 93.778 Federal Agency – Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program Title – Medicaid Cluster State Program Title: Various State ID Number: Various Pass-Through Numbers(s): Various Award Period: January 1, 2024 to December 31, 2024 Compliance Requirement Reporting, Cash Management Criteria or Specific Requirement Uniform Guidance requires the reporting of costs or activities as the basis for making payments to providers. Review of claims and expenditures reconciliation is important control over compliance to ensure reports are properly prepared and agree with the County’s actual activity. Condition The county did not perform review procedures over claims prior to submission or over monthly reconciliations. Questioned Costs None Context During reporting testing, it was noted that the County does not have review process in place for reporting. Cause There was no review over the monthly claims and monthly expenditures reconciliation prior to submission. 2024-003 (Continued) Review of Claim Forms and Expenditure Reconciliation Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Effect Unallowed costs could be claimed, or costs could be double claimed. Repeat Finding New finding in 2024. Recommendation We recommend that there is an appropriate reviewer of each grant claim and monthly reconciliation. View of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2024-003 Uniform Guidance and State Single Audit Guidelines Findings Review of Claim Forms and Expenditure Reconciliation Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Federal Assistance Listing Numbers – 93.778 Federal Agency – Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program Title – Medicaid Cluster State Program Title: Various State ID Number: Various Pass-Through Numbers(s): Various Award Period: January 1, 2024 to December 31, 2024 Compliance Requirement Reporting, Cash Management Criteria or Specific Requirement Uniform Guidance requires the reporting of costs or activities as the basis for making payments to providers. Review of claims and expenditures reconciliation is important control over compliance to ensure reports are properly prepared and agree with the County’s actual activity. Condition The county did not perform review procedures over claims prior to submission or over monthly reconciliations. Questioned Costs None Context During reporting testing, it was noted that the County does not have review process in place for reporting. Cause There was no review over the monthly claims and monthly expenditures reconciliation prior to submission. 2024-003 (Continued) Review of Claim Forms and Expenditure Reconciliation Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Effect Unallowed costs could be claimed, or costs could be double claimed. Repeat Finding New finding in 2024. Recommendation We recommend that there is an appropriate reviewer of each grant claim and monthly reconciliation. View of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2024-003 Uniform Guidance and State Single Audit Guidelines Findings Review of Claim Forms and Expenditure Reconciliation Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Federal Assistance Listing Numbers – 93.778 Federal Agency – Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program Title – Medicaid Cluster State Program Title: Various State ID Number: Various Pass-Through Numbers(s): Various Award Period: January 1, 2024 to December 31, 2024 Compliance Requirement Reporting, Cash Management Criteria or Specific Requirement Uniform Guidance requires the reporting of costs or activities as the basis for making payments to providers. Review of claims and expenditures reconciliation is important control over compliance to ensure reports are properly prepared and agree with the County’s actual activity. Condition The county did not perform review procedures over claims prior to submission or over monthly reconciliations. Questioned Costs None Context During reporting testing, it was noted that the County does not have review process in place for reporting. Cause There was no review over the monthly claims and monthly expenditures reconciliation prior to submission. 2024-003 (Continued) Review of Claim Forms and Expenditure Reconciliation Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Effect Unallowed costs could be claimed, or costs could be double claimed. Repeat Finding New finding in 2024. Recommendation We recommend that there is an appropriate reviewer of each grant claim and monthly reconciliation. View of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2024-003 Uniform Guidance and State Single Audit Guidelines Findings Review of Claim Forms and Expenditure Reconciliation Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Federal Assistance Listing Numbers – 93.778 Federal Agency – Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program Title – Medicaid Cluster State Program Title: Various State ID Number: Various Pass-Through Numbers(s): Various Award Period: January 1, 2024 to December 31, 2024 Compliance Requirement Reporting, Cash Management Criteria or Specific Requirement Uniform Guidance requires the reporting of costs or activities as the basis for making payments to providers. Review of claims and expenditures reconciliation is important control over compliance to ensure reports are properly prepared and agree with the County’s actual activity. Condition The county did not perform review procedures over claims prior to submission or over monthly reconciliations. Questioned Costs None Context During reporting testing, it was noted that the County does not have review process in place for reporting. Cause There was no review over the monthly claims and monthly expenditures reconciliation prior to submission. 2024-003 (Continued) Review of Claim Forms and Expenditure Reconciliation Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Effect Unallowed costs could be claimed, or costs could be double claimed. Repeat Finding New finding in 2024. Recommendation We recommend that there is an appropriate reviewer of each grant claim and monthly reconciliation. View of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2024-003 Uniform Guidance and State Single Audit Guidelines Findings Review of Claim Forms and Expenditure Reconciliation Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Federal Assistance Listing Numbers – 93.778 Federal Agency – Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program Title – Medicaid Cluster State Program Title: Various State ID Number: Various Pass-Through Numbers(s): Various Award Period: January 1, 2024 to December 31, 2024 Compliance Requirement Reporting, Cash Management Criteria or Specific Requirement Uniform Guidance requires the reporting of costs or activities as the basis for making payments to providers. Review of claims and expenditures reconciliation is important control over compliance to ensure reports are properly prepared and agree with the County’s actual activity. Condition The county did not perform review procedures over claims prior to submission or over monthly reconciliations. Questioned Costs None Context During reporting testing, it was noted that the County does not have review process in place for reporting. Cause There was no review over the monthly claims and monthly expenditures reconciliation prior to submission. 2024-003 (Continued) Review of Claim Forms and Expenditure Reconciliation Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Effect Unallowed costs could be claimed, or costs could be double claimed. Repeat Finding New finding in 2024. Recommendation We recommend that there is an appropriate reviewer of each grant claim and monthly reconciliation. View of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2024-003 Uniform Guidance and State Single Audit Guidelines Findings Review of Claim Forms and Expenditure Reconciliation Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Federal Assistance Listing Numbers – 93.778 Federal Agency – Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program Title – Medicaid Cluster State Program Title: Various State ID Number: Various Pass-Through Numbers(s): Various Award Period: January 1, 2024 to December 31, 2024 Compliance Requirement Reporting, Cash Management Criteria or Specific Requirement Uniform Guidance requires the reporting of costs or activities as the basis for making payments to providers. Review of claims and expenditures reconciliation is important control over compliance to ensure reports are properly prepared and agree with the County’s actual activity. Condition The county did not perform review procedures over claims prior to submission or over monthly reconciliations. Questioned Costs None Context During reporting testing, it was noted that the County does not have review process in place for reporting. Cause There was no review over the monthly claims and monthly expenditures reconciliation prior to submission. 2024-003 (Continued) Review of Claim Forms and Expenditure Reconciliation Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Effect Unallowed costs could be claimed, or costs could be double claimed. Repeat Finding New finding in 2024. Recommendation We recommend that there is an appropriate reviewer of each grant claim and monthly reconciliation. View of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2024-003 Uniform Guidance and State Single Audit Guidelines Findings Review of Claim Forms and Expenditure Reconciliation Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Federal Assistance Listing Numbers – 93.778 Federal Agency – Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program Title – Medicaid Cluster State Program Title: Various State ID Number: Various Pass-Through Numbers(s): Various Award Period: January 1, 2024 to December 31, 2024 Compliance Requirement Reporting, Cash Management Criteria or Specific Requirement Uniform Guidance requires the reporting of costs or activities as the basis for making payments to providers. Review of claims and expenditures reconciliation is important control over compliance to ensure reports are properly prepared and agree with the County’s actual activity. Condition The county did not perform review procedures over claims prior to submission or over monthly reconciliations. Questioned Costs None Context During reporting testing, it was noted that the County does not have review process in place for reporting. Cause There was no review over the monthly claims and monthly expenditures reconciliation prior to submission. 2024-003 (Continued) Review of Claim Forms and Expenditure Reconciliation Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Effect Unallowed costs could be claimed, or costs could be double claimed. Repeat Finding New finding in 2024. Recommendation We recommend that there is an appropriate reviewer of each grant claim and monthly reconciliation. View of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2024-003 Uniform Guidance and State Single Audit Guidelines Findings Review of Claim Forms and Expenditure Reconciliation Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Federal Assistance Listing Numbers – 93.778 Federal Agency – Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program Title – Medicaid Cluster State Program Title: Various State ID Number: Various Pass-Through Numbers(s): Various Award Period: January 1, 2024 to December 31, 2024 Compliance Requirement Reporting, Cash Management Criteria or Specific Requirement Uniform Guidance requires the reporting of costs or activities as the basis for making payments to providers. Review of claims and expenditures reconciliation is important control over compliance to ensure reports are properly prepared and agree with the County’s actual activity. Condition The county did not perform review procedures over claims prior to submission or over monthly reconciliations. Questioned Costs None Context During reporting testing, it was noted that the County does not have review process in place for reporting. Cause There was no review over the monthly claims and monthly expenditures reconciliation prior to submission. 2024-003 (Continued) Review of Claim Forms and Expenditure Reconciliation Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Effect Unallowed costs could be claimed, or costs could be double claimed. Repeat Finding New finding in 2024. Recommendation We recommend that there is an appropriate reviewer of each grant claim and monthly reconciliation. View of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2024-003 Uniform Guidance and State Single Audit Guidelines Findings Review of Claim Forms and Expenditure Reconciliation Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Federal Assistance Listing Numbers – 93.778 Federal Agency – Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program Title – Medicaid Cluster State Program Title: Various State ID Number: Various Pass-Through Numbers(s): Various Award Period: January 1, 2024 to December 31, 2024 Compliance Requirement Reporting, Cash Management Criteria or Specific Requirement Uniform Guidance requires the reporting of costs or activities as the basis for making payments to providers. Review of claims and expenditures reconciliation is important control over compliance to ensure reports are properly prepared and agree with the County’s actual activity. Condition The county did not perform review procedures over claims prior to submission or over monthly reconciliations. Questioned Costs None Context During reporting testing, it was noted that the County does not have review process in place for reporting. Cause There was no review over the monthly claims and monthly expenditures reconciliation prior to submission. 2024-003 (Continued) Review of Claim Forms and Expenditure Reconciliation Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Effect Unallowed costs could be claimed, or costs could be double claimed. Repeat Finding New finding in 2024. Recommendation We recommend that there is an appropriate reviewer of each grant claim and monthly reconciliation. View of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Condition The County has various policies and procedures in place to safeguard its assets and establish related controls over receipts, disbursements, payroll transactions and general ledger maintenance. Federal awards received and disbursed by the County are managed through these county-wide policies and procedures; however, the policies and procedures have not been evaluated to ensure compliance with requirements of Uniform Guidance. As an example, the County is required to have an allowable cost policy which establishes the responsible officials who are able to determine if a cost is allowable. While expenditures tested had documentation of approval, implementing a formal policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance would improve transparency and effectiveness of the County’s documentation. Questioned Costs None Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place that conform to Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Cause The County has not finalized an assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards, along with an evaluation of existing policies for compliance with Uniform Guidance by year-end. Effect The County could become noncompliant with requirements of Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to federal awards administered by the County. Repeat Finding The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2023-002. Recommendation We recommend the County finalize the assessment of its financial management system and related internal controls over federal awards during 2025. This assessment should include an evaluation of existing policies and procedures to determine where additional enhancements should be made or new policies created, a plan to communicate these policies to County employees, and procedures to periodically review and update, as considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.