Audit 363795

FY End
2024-06-30
Total Expended
$6.17M
Findings
4
Programs
5
Organization: City of Harrington (DE)
Year: 2024 Accepted: 2025-08-06

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
572965 2024-003 Significant Deficiency Yes I
572966 2024-004 Significant Deficiency Yes I
1149407 2024-003 Significant Deficiency Yes I
1149408 2024-004 Significant Deficiency Yes I

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
21.029 Coronavirus Capital Projects Fund $5.19M Yes 1
10.760 Water and Waste Disposal Systems for Rural Communities $845,014 - 0
21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds $123,778 Yes 1
20.607 Alcohol Open Container Requirements $3,552 - 0
20.600 State and Community Highway Safety $1,962 - 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
EAQ5VJ6H3HV8 Amanda Marlow Auditee
3023983530 Paige Rubino Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. The City of Harrington, Delaware has elected to not use the 10 percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: N/A Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. The City of Harrington, Delaware has elected to not use the 10 percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance.

Finding Details

The City was unable to provide documentation to support compliance with the required State procurement processes for acquiring property or services. In addition, the City did not provide support that the suspension and debarment status of the vendor was checked before the contract was awarded.
The City was unable to provide documentation to support compliance with the required State procurement processes for acquiring property or services. In addition, the City did not provide support that the suspension and debarment status of the vendor was checked before the contract was awarded.
The City was unable to provide documentation to support compliance with the required State procurement processes for acquiring property or services. In addition, the City did not provide support that the suspension and debarment status of the vendor was checked before the contract was awarded.
The City was unable to provide documentation to support compliance with the required State procurement processes for acquiring property or services. In addition, the City did not provide support that the suspension and debarment status of the vendor was checked before the contract was awarded.