Audit 363741

FY End
2024-03-31
Total Expended
$173.51M
Findings
8
Programs
9

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
572627 2024-003 - - E
572628 2024-003 - - E
572629 2024-003 - - E
572630 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes C
1149069 2024-003 - - E
1149070 2024-003 - - E
1149071 2024-003 - - E
1149072 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes C

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
14.871 Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers $4.17M Yes 1
14.872 Public Housing Capital Fund $4.01M Yes 1
14.879 Mainstream Vouchers $3.01M Yes 1
14.850 Public and Indian Housing $1.09M - 0
14.241 Housing Opportunities for Persons with Aids $832,321 - 0
14.238 Shelter Plus Care $574,477 - 0
17.274 Youthbuild $571,426 - 0
14.870 Resident Opportunity and Supportive Services - Service Coordinators $561,831 - 0
93.137 Minority Community Health Coalition Demonstration $188,803 - 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
DLJLFMBQJ833 Scott Pontz Auditee
8133419101 Laura Anne Pray Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: NOTE 1 - BASIS OF PRESENTATION Accounting Policies: The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards and local assistance includes the federal grant activity of the Housing Authority of the City of Tampa, Florida and is presented on the accrual basis of accounting. The information on this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (“Uniform Guidance”). Therefore, some amounts presented in this schedule may differ from amounts presented in, or used in the preparation of, the basic financial statements. In accordance with HUD regulations, HUD considers the Annual Budget Authority for the Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program (“HCV”), AL No. 14.871, to be an expenditure for the purposes of this schedule. Therefore, the amount in this schedule represents the total amount received directly from HUD and not the expenditures paid by the Authority. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Authority did not elect to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards and local assistance includes the federal grant activity of the Housing Authority of the City of Tampa, Florida and is presented on the accrual basis of accounting. The information on this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (“Uniform Guidance”). Therefore, some amounts presented in this schedule may differ from amounts presented in, or used in the preparation of, the basic financial statements. In accordance with HUD regulations, HUD considers the Annual Budget Authority for the Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program (“HCV”), AL No. 14.871, to be an expenditure for the purposes of this schedule. Therefore, the amount in this schedule represents the total amount received directly from HUD and not the expenditures paid by the Authority.
Title: NOTE 2 - FEDERAL AWARD RECEIVING A SEPARATE AUDIT Accounting Policies: The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards and local assistance includes the federal grant activity of the Housing Authority of the City of Tampa, Florida and is presented on the accrual basis of accounting. The information on this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (“Uniform Guidance”). Therefore, some amounts presented in this schedule may differ from amounts presented in, or used in the preparation of, the basic financial statements. In accordance with HUD regulations, HUD considers the Annual Budget Authority for the Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program (“HCV”), AL No. 14.871, to be an expenditure for the purposes of this schedule. Therefore, the amount in this schedule represents the total amount received directly from HUD and not the expenditures paid by the Authority. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Authority did not elect to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards and local assistance excludes $499,678,891 of expenditures for a Performance Based Contract Administrator Agreement with HUD for the State of Florida and the U.S. Virgin Islands. There is a separately issued schedule of expenditures of federal awards in the annual audit performed in accordance with the requirements of Uniform Guidance dated December 30, 2024, for North Tampa Housing Development Corporation, a blended component unit of the Authority, in which that federal award is included. If that amount had been included in the accompanying schedule the total expenditures of federal and local awards would have been $674,787,394.
Title: NOTE 3 - INDIRECT COST RATE Accounting Policies: The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards and local assistance includes the federal grant activity of the Housing Authority of the City of Tampa, Florida and is presented on the accrual basis of accounting. The information on this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (“Uniform Guidance”). Therefore, some amounts presented in this schedule may differ from amounts presented in, or used in the preparation of, the basic financial statements. In accordance with HUD regulations, HUD considers the Annual Budget Authority for the Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program (“HCV”), AL No. 14.871, to be an expenditure for the purposes of this schedule. Therefore, the amount in this schedule represents the total amount received directly from HUD and not the expenditures paid by the Authority. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Authority did not elect to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate. The Authority did not elect to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate.
Title: NOTE 4 - SUB-RECIPIENTS Accounting Policies: The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards and local assistance includes the federal grant activity of the Housing Authority of the City of Tampa, Florida and is presented on the accrual basis of accounting. The information on this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (“Uniform Guidance”). Therefore, some amounts presented in this schedule may differ from amounts presented in, or used in the preparation of, the basic financial statements. In accordance with HUD regulations, HUD considers the Annual Budget Authority for the Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program (“HCV”), AL No. 14.871, to be an expenditure for the purposes of this schedule. Therefore, the amount in this schedule represents the total amount received directly from HUD and not the expenditures paid by the Authority. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Authority did not elect to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate. During the year ended March 31, 2024, the Authority had no sub-recipients.
Title: NOTE 5 - NONCASH ASSISTANCE AND OTHER Accounting Policies: The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards and local assistance includes the federal grant activity of the Housing Authority of the City of Tampa, Florida and is presented on the accrual basis of accounting. The information on this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (“Uniform Guidance”). Therefore, some amounts presented in this schedule may differ from amounts presented in, or used in the preparation of, the basic financial statements. In accordance with HUD regulations, HUD considers the Annual Budget Authority for the Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program (“HCV”), AL No. 14.871, to be an expenditure for the purposes of this schedule. Therefore, the amount in this schedule represents the total amount received directly from HUD and not the expenditures paid by the Authority. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Authority did not elect to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate. The Authority did not receive any noncash assistance, federal loans, or federally funded insurance during the year ended March 31, 2024.

Finding Details

Condition: Out of a population of approximately 11,100 tenants for the Housing Voucher Cluster, 40 tenant files were tested and 2 files had incorrect income calculations. Context: The auditor haphazardly selected 40 tenant files out of the population, which we consider to be a statistically valid sample size. The auditor reviewed the tenant files and supporting documentation to ensure proper procedures are being followed and that the Authority is in compliance with HUD requirements regarding timely, complete, and accurate tenant files. Criteria: The Authority’s Administrative Plan and 24 CFR 982.516 requires internal controls to be in place to ensure proper procedures are being followed in compliance with HUD requirements regarding timely, complete, and accurate tenant files. Cause: The Authority experienced staffing and operational challenges during the year and did not have the available staff to follow the established internal controls to ensure proper compliance with regards to timely recertifications and collection of required HUD documentation to verify eligibility and calculate accurate housing assistance payments. Effect: The Authority is not in full compliance with HUD requirements regarding eligibility which could result in the incorrect amount of rental assistance provided. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Auditor’s Recommendations: The Authority should reevaluate their established procedures and controls in place to ensure full compliance in regards to recertifications. The Authority needs to correct the deficiencies noted in the tested files and consider the impact to the rest of the population of tenant files that were not selected as part of the auditor’s sample. View of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan.
Condition: Out of a population of approximately 11,100 tenants for the Housing Voucher Cluster, 40 tenant files were tested and 2 files had incorrect income calculations. Context: The auditor haphazardly selected 40 tenant files out of the population, which we consider to be a statistically valid sample size. The auditor reviewed the tenant files and supporting documentation to ensure proper procedures are being followed and that the Authority is in compliance with HUD requirements regarding timely, complete, and accurate tenant files. Criteria: The Authority’s Administrative Plan and 24 CFR 982.516 requires internal controls to be in place to ensure proper procedures are being followed in compliance with HUD requirements regarding timely, complete, and accurate tenant files. Cause: The Authority experienced staffing and operational challenges during the year and did not have the available staff to follow the established internal controls to ensure proper compliance with regards to timely recertifications and collection of required HUD documentation to verify eligibility and calculate accurate housing assistance payments. Effect: The Authority is not in full compliance with HUD requirements regarding eligibility which could result in the incorrect amount of rental assistance provided. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Auditor’s Recommendations: The Authority should reevaluate their established procedures and controls in place to ensure full compliance in regards to recertifications. The Authority needs to correct the deficiencies noted in the tested files and consider the impact to the rest of the population of tenant files that were not selected as part of the auditor’s sample. View of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan.
Condition: Out of a population of approximately 11,100 tenants for the Housing Voucher Cluster, 40 tenant files were tested and 2 files had incorrect income calculations. Context: The auditor haphazardly selected 40 tenant files out of the population, which we consider to be a statistically valid sample size. The auditor reviewed the tenant files and supporting documentation to ensure proper procedures are being followed and that the Authority is in compliance with HUD requirements regarding timely, complete, and accurate tenant files. Criteria: The Authority’s Administrative Plan and 24 CFR 982.516 requires internal controls to be in place to ensure proper procedures are being followed in compliance with HUD requirements regarding timely, complete, and accurate tenant files. Cause: The Authority experienced staffing and operational challenges during the year and did not have the available staff to follow the established internal controls to ensure proper compliance with regards to timely recertifications and collection of required HUD documentation to verify eligibility and calculate accurate housing assistance payments. Effect: The Authority is not in full compliance with HUD requirements regarding eligibility which could result in the incorrect amount of rental assistance provided. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Auditor’s Recommendations: The Authority should reevaluate their established procedures and controls in place to ensure full compliance in regards to recertifications. The Authority needs to correct the deficiencies noted in the tested files and consider the impact to the rest of the population of tenant files that were not selected as part of the auditor’s sample. View of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan.
Condition: Out of the 36 grant drawdowns during the year, of the 15 drawdowns that were tested, 3 of the drawdowns were made in advance of the supporting invoices being paid and subsequently the invoices were not paid within the 72-hours, as required. Context: The auditor haphazardly selected 15 grant drawdowns from the population, which we consider to be a statistically valid sample size. The auditor reviewed the drawdowns and supporting documentation to ensure proper procedures are being followed and that the Authority is in compliance with HUD requirements. Criteria: The U.S. Treasury per 2 CFR section 200.305 (2 CFR section 200.302(b)(6)) requires grant funds received by the Authority to be properly spent within 72 hours of receipt. HUD regulations require that proper documentation be maintained for all Capital Fund Program per 24 CFR 905.326. Cause: The Authority experienced staff turnover in the finance department as well as difficulty replacing personnel knowledgeable with HUD and grant reporting requirements. Effect: The Authority did not disburse the capital funds in a timely manner for some of the draws made during the year. Questioned Costs: $379,570 Auditor’s Recommendations: The Authority should continue to develop and implement internal controls over grant management to coordinate capital fund draws with the timing of invoice payments. View of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan
Condition: Out of a population of approximately 11,100 tenants for the Housing Voucher Cluster, 40 tenant files were tested and 2 files had incorrect income calculations. Context: The auditor haphazardly selected 40 tenant files out of the population, which we consider to be a statistically valid sample size. The auditor reviewed the tenant files and supporting documentation to ensure proper procedures are being followed and that the Authority is in compliance with HUD requirements regarding timely, complete, and accurate tenant files. Criteria: The Authority’s Administrative Plan and 24 CFR 982.516 requires internal controls to be in place to ensure proper procedures are being followed in compliance with HUD requirements regarding timely, complete, and accurate tenant files. Cause: The Authority experienced staffing and operational challenges during the year and did not have the available staff to follow the established internal controls to ensure proper compliance with regards to timely recertifications and collection of required HUD documentation to verify eligibility and calculate accurate housing assistance payments. Effect: The Authority is not in full compliance with HUD requirements regarding eligibility which could result in the incorrect amount of rental assistance provided. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Auditor’s Recommendations: The Authority should reevaluate their established procedures and controls in place to ensure full compliance in regards to recertifications. The Authority needs to correct the deficiencies noted in the tested files and consider the impact to the rest of the population of tenant files that were not selected as part of the auditor’s sample. View of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan.
Condition: Out of a population of approximately 11,100 tenants for the Housing Voucher Cluster, 40 tenant files were tested and 2 files had incorrect income calculations. Context: The auditor haphazardly selected 40 tenant files out of the population, which we consider to be a statistically valid sample size. The auditor reviewed the tenant files and supporting documentation to ensure proper procedures are being followed and that the Authority is in compliance with HUD requirements regarding timely, complete, and accurate tenant files. Criteria: The Authority’s Administrative Plan and 24 CFR 982.516 requires internal controls to be in place to ensure proper procedures are being followed in compliance with HUD requirements regarding timely, complete, and accurate tenant files. Cause: The Authority experienced staffing and operational challenges during the year and did not have the available staff to follow the established internal controls to ensure proper compliance with regards to timely recertifications and collection of required HUD documentation to verify eligibility and calculate accurate housing assistance payments. Effect: The Authority is not in full compliance with HUD requirements regarding eligibility which could result in the incorrect amount of rental assistance provided. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Auditor’s Recommendations: The Authority should reevaluate their established procedures and controls in place to ensure full compliance in regards to recertifications. The Authority needs to correct the deficiencies noted in the tested files and consider the impact to the rest of the population of tenant files that were not selected as part of the auditor’s sample. View of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan.
Condition: Out of a population of approximately 11,100 tenants for the Housing Voucher Cluster, 40 tenant files were tested and 2 files had incorrect income calculations. Context: The auditor haphazardly selected 40 tenant files out of the population, which we consider to be a statistically valid sample size. The auditor reviewed the tenant files and supporting documentation to ensure proper procedures are being followed and that the Authority is in compliance with HUD requirements regarding timely, complete, and accurate tenant files. Criteria: The Authority’s Administrative Plan and 24 CFR 982.516 requires internal controls to be in place to ensure proper procedures are being followed in compliance with HUD requirements regarding timely, complete, and accurate tenant files. Cause: The Authority experienced staffing and operational challenges during the year and did not have the available staff to follow the established internal controls to ensure proper compliance with regards to timely recertifications and collection of required HUD documentation to verify eligibility and calculate accurate housing assistance payments. Effect: The Authority is not in full compliance with HUD requirements regarding eligibility which could result in the incorrect amount of rental assistance provided. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Auditor’s Recommendations: The Authority should reevaluate their established procedures and controls in place to ensure full compliance in regards to recertifications. The Authority needs to correct the deficiencies noted in the tested files and consider the impact to the rest of the population of tenant files that were not selected as part of the auditor’s sample. View of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan.
Condition: Out of the 36 grant drawdowns during the year, of the 15 drawdowns that were tested, 3 of the drawdowns were made in advance of the supporting invoices being paid and subsequently the invoices were not paid within the 72-hours, as required. Context: The auditor haphazardly selected 15 grant drawdowns from the population, which we consider to be a statistically valid sample size. The auditor reviewed the drawdowns and supporting documentation to ensure proper procedures are being followed and that the Authority is in compliance with HUD requirements. Criteria: The U.S. Treasury per 2 CFR section 200.305 (2 CFR section 200.302(b)(6)) requires grant funds received by the Authority to be properly spent within 72 hours of receipt. HUD regulations require that proper documentation be maintained for all Capital Fund Program per 24 CFR 905.326. Cause: The Authority experienced staff turnover in the finance department as well as difficulty replacing personnel knowledgeable with HUD and grant reporting requirements. Effect: The Authority did not disburse the capital funds in a timely manner for some of the draws made during the year. Questioned Costs: $379,570 Auditor’s Recommendations: The Authority should continue to develop and implement internal controls over grant management to coordinate capital fund draws with the timing of invoice payments. View of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan