Audit 363740

FY End
2025-03-31
Total Expended
$3.86M
Findings
2
Programs
1
Organization: Asi Freeport, Inc. (MN)
Year: 2025 Accepted: 2025-08-05

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
572626 2025-001 - - B
1149068 2025-001 - - B

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
14.181 Supportive Housing for Persons with Disabilities $117,824 Yes 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
VKF7DRESA2Y1 Les Russo Auditee
8474245601 Brian Baker Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: NOTE A – BASIS OF PRESENTATION Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. ASI Freeport, Inc. has elected not to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: ASI Freeport, Inc. has elected not to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards includes the federal award activity of ASI Freeport, Inc., HUD Project No. 071-HD175, and is presented on the accrual basis of accounting. The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of ASI Freeport, Inc., it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net assets, or cash flows of ASI Freeport, Inc.
Title: NOTE B – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. ASI Freeport, Inc. has elected not to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: ASI Freeport, Inc. has elected not to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. ASI Freeport, Inc. has elected not to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance.
Title: NOTE C - U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT LOAN PROGRAM Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. ASI Freeport, Inc. has elected not to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: ASI Freeport, Inc. has elected not to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. There are no HUD loans in this Project.

Finding Details

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT FINDING 2025-001: SECTION 811, ASSISTANCE LISTING NUMBER 14.181 Condition: The Project overpaid management fees by $755 to the management company. Criteria: Management fees should be calculated according to HUD guidelines. Effect: The Project's management fee is overstated. Context: The management fee for the year was tested for accuracy. The test determined that the management fee charged by the management company was more than the calculated amount. No sample was tested. Questioned Costs - $755; Cause: The management company did not compute the management fee correctly. Recommendation: The management company should reimburse the Project for the $755 overpayment. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The Project agrees with the finding. The management company will repay the overpaid management fee as soon as possible. Total-Department of Housing and Urban Development -$755; Non-compliance code - J
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT FINDING 2025-001: SECTION 811, ASSISTANCE LISTING NUMBER 14.181 Condition: The Project overpaid management fees by $755 to the management company. Criteria: Management fees should be calculated according to HUD guidelines. Effect: The Project's management fee is overstated. Context: The management fee for the year was tested for accuracy. The test determined that the management fee charged by the management company was more than the calculated amount. No sample was tested. Questioned Costs - $755; Cause: The management company did not compute the management fee correctly. Recommendation: The management company should reimburse the Project for the $755 overpayment. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The Project agrees with the finding. The management company will repay the overpaid management fee as soon as possible. Total-Department of Housing and Urban Development -$755; Non-compliance code - J