Audit 363546

FY End
2024-06-30
Total Expended
$6.14M
Findings
2
Programs
55
Organization: County of Modoc (CA)
Year: 2024 Accepted: 2025-08-01

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
572415 2024-002 Material Weakness Yes I
1148857 2024-002 Material Weakness Yes I

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
93.558 Temporary Assistance to Needy Families $861,716 Yes 0
21.027 Covid-19 Disaster Grants- Public Assistance $721,518 Yes 1
93.658 Foster Care Title IV-E $689,901 Yes 0
93.659 Adoption Assistance Title IV-E $360,369 - 0
93.778 Medical Assistance Program (medicaid Title Xix) $358,967 Yes 0
93.268 Immunization Assistance Program -Cdc $275,931 - 0
93.959 Substance Abuse, Prevention & Treatment (sapt) Block Grants $271,225 - 0
20.939 Modoc County Ss4a Implementation Grant 2022 $266,783 - 0
16.575 Victims of Crime Assistance (voca) $202,666 - 0
10.561 Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (snap) $185,342 - 0
10.561 Calfresh Healthy Living $151,484 - 0
93.889 Public Health Emergency Preparedness $132,157 - 0
97.042 Fy 2022 Emergency Management Performance Grant (empg) $124,447 - 0
10.447 Rural Development Migrant Housing Construction Grant/loan $121,477 - 0
15.659 Revenue Sharing Act/kuchel Act Pl88-567 $96,929 - 0
93.977 Disease Intervention Specialist Workforce Development Grant $92,798 - 0
20.106 Tulelake Airport - Enviroass Phase III $78,003 - 0
97.036 California Disaster Assistance Act Program $69,301 - 0
93.994 Maternal Child Adolescent Health-202325 $65,584 - 0
93.967 Casphi (california Strengthening Public Health Iniative) $65,040 - 0
20.205 Stip Ppno - 2581 - Cr 111n Rehab $59,970 - 0
93.354 Covid-19 Ph Crisis Reponse and the Ph Workforce Development Supplemental Funding $59,846 - 0
93.323 Covid-19 Elc Enhancing Detection Funding $59,222 - 0
97.067 Fy 2021 Homeland Security Grant Program (hsgp) $54,855 - 0
93.391 California Equitable Recovery Initiative (ceri) $51,588 - 0
93.778 Child Health & Disability Prevention Program $40,877 Yes 0
97.067 Fy 2022 Homeland Security Grant Program (hsgp) $38,265 - 0
20.205 Rpstp-5903 - Cr 55 $32,069 - 0
93.323 Covid-19 Elc Enhancing Detection Expansion Funding $31,540 - 0
93.778 California Children's Services Title 19 $31,259 Yes 0
93.071 Medicare Enrollment Assistance Program $28,761 - 0
97.067 Fy 2023 Homeland Security Grant Program (hsgp) $28,357 - 0
93.590 Community-Based Child Abuse Prevention $27,837 - 0
93.658 Foster Care-Title IV-E $24,311 Yes 0
93.778 Maternal Child Adolescent Health-202325 $22,480 Yes 0
20.106 Airport Layout Plan Alp $19,351 - 0
93.667 Social Services Block Grant (cws Title Xx) $15,752 - 0
93.069 Public Health Emergency Preparedness $15,596 - 0
93.090 Fedgap Assistance $15,055 - 0
10.665 Secure Rural Schools and Counties - Rac Title II $12,603 - 0
10.704 Usfs Patrol Grant $12,542 - 0
93.556 Promoting Safe and Stable Families (pssf) $11,740 - 0
93.674 Independent Living Program (ilp) $9,784 - 0
93.778 Health Care Program for Children in Foster Care Pmmo $8,205 Yes 0
93.778 Health Care Program for Children in Foster Care $7,563 Yes 0
93.645 Child Welfare Services (cws IV-B) $6,815 - 0
93.767 California Children's Services Title 21 $5,810 - 0
20.106 Pavement Maintenance Management Program $4,524 - 0
15.227 Distribution of Receipts to State and Local Government $4,283 - 0
93.917 Ryan White $3,639 - 0
93.563 Administration for Children and Families - Child Support $3,430 - 0
93.778 Health Care Program for Children in Foster Care Caseload Relief $2,223 Yes 0
20.106 Airport Coronavirus Relief Grant Program (acrgp) $1,948 - 0
20.106 Airport Rescue Grant (arg) Tulelake Airport $391 - 0
10.025 Cfda Pest Management $218 - 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
PR4KNB6J6SS3 Stephanie Wellemeyer Auditee
5302336207 Brianne Wiese Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Reporting Entity Accounting Policies: The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Expenditures reported on the schedule are reported on the modified accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Therefore, some amounts presented in the schedule may differ from amounts presented in, or used in the preparation of, the financial statements. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The County did not elect to use the 10 percent de minimis indirect cost rate as covered in 2 CFR §200.414. Uniform Guidance §200.510(6) requires the County to disclose whether or not it elected to use the 10 percent de minimis cost rate that §200.414(f) allows for nonfederal entities that have never received a negotiated indirect cost rate. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards presents the activity of all federal awards programs of the County of Modoc for the year ended June 30, 2024, except for any federal awards that may have been received by the Modoc County Children and Families Commission. The County of Modoc’s reporting entity is defined in Note 1 to the County’s basic financial statements. All federal awards received directly from federal agencies as well federal awards passed through other government agencies are included in the schedule.
Title: Federal Assistance Listing Numbers Accounting Policies: The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Expenditures reported on the schedule are reported on the modified accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Therefore, some amounts presented in the schedule may differ from amounts presented in, or used in the preparation of, the financial statements. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The County did not elect to use the 10 percent de minimis indirect cost rate as covered in 2 CFR §200.414. Uniform Guidance §200.510(6) requires the County to disclose whether or not it elected to use the 10 percent de minimis cost rate that §200.414(f) allows for nonfederal entities that have never received a negotiated indirect cost rate. The program titles and Assistance Listing numbers were obtained from the federal or pass-through grantor. When no Assistance Listing number had been assigned to a program, the two-digit federal agency identifier and the federal contract number were used. When there was no federal contract number, the two-digit federal agency identifier and the word “unknown” were used.
Title: Pass-Through Entities' Identifying Number Accounting Policies: The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Expenditures reported on the schedule are reported on the modified accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Therefore, some amounts presented in the schedule may differ from amounts presented in, or used in the preparation of, the financial statements. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The County did not elect to use the 10 percent de minimis indirect cost rate as covered in 2 CFR §200.414. Uniform Guidance §200.510(6) requires the County to disclose whether or not it elected to use the 10 percent de minimis cost rate that §200.414(f) allows for nonfederal entities that have never received a negotiated indirect cost rate. When federal awards were received from a pass-through entity, the schedule of expenditures of federal awards shows, if available, the identifying number assigned by the pass-through entity. When no identifying number is shown, the County determined that no identifying number is assigned for the program or the County was unable to obtain an identifying number from the pass-through entity.

Finding Details

Criteria or specific requirement: Per 2 CFR 200 Appendix II (H) Debarment and Suspension (Executive Orders 12549 and 12689)—A contract award (see 2 CFR 180.220) must not be made to parties listed on the governmentwide exclusions in the System for Award Management (SAM), in accordance with the OMB guidelines at 2 CFR 180 that implement Executive Orders 12549 (3 CFR part 1986 Comp., p. 189) and 12689 (3 CFR part 1989 Comp., p. 235), “Debarment and Suspension.” SAM Exclusions contains the names of parties debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded by agencies, as well as parties declared ineligible under statutory or regulatory authority other than Executive Order 12549. Condition: During our testing, we noted that management’s review of contracts did not include a review to ensure that the party was not debarred, suspended or otherwise excluded. Questioned costs: None. Context: Audit procedures included a review of the three agreements during the year ended June 30, 2024, which represented the entire population. For all of the items reviewed management did not obtain verification that the party was not debarred, suspended or otherwise excluded, prior to entering into the transactions. However, upon subsequent review, no parties were determined the be debarred, suspended or otherwise excluded. Cause: The County’s procurement process did not include a requirement that required a verification of debarred or suspended status. Effect: Amounts could be paid to parties that are debarred, suspended or otherwise excluded. Repeat Finding: Yes Recommendation: We recommend that management enhance the procurement controls to ensure that all required parties are reviewed for suspension and debarment prior to entering the transaction. Views of responsible officials: The County agrees with the findings. Corrective action plan: The County has developed a formal policy, which has been distributed to all departments. The policy is scheduled to take effect in Fiscal Year 2024–2025.
Criteria or specific requirement: Per 2 CFR 200 Appendix II (H) Debarment and Suspension (Executive Orders 12549 and 12689)—A contract award (see 2 CFR 180.220) must not be made to parties listed on the governmentwide exclusions in the System for Award Management (SAM), in accordance with the OMB guidelines at 2 CFR 180 that implement Executive Orders 12549 (3 CFR part 1986 Comp., p. 189) and 12689 (3 CFR part 1989 Comp., p. 235), “Debarment and Suspension.” SAM Exclusions contains the names of parties debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded by agencies, as well as parties declared ineligible under statutory or regulatory authority other than Executive Order 12549. Condition: During our testing, we noted that management’s review of contracts did not include a review to ensure that the party was not debarred, suspended or otherwise excluded. Questioned costs: None. Context: Audit procedures included a review of the three agreements during the year ended June 30, 2024, which represented the entire population. For all of the items reviewed management did not obtain verification that the party was not debarred, suspended or otherwise excluded, prior to entering into the transactions. However, upon subsequent review, no parties were determined the be debarred, suspended or otherwise excluded. Cause: The County’s procurement process did not include a requirement that required a verification of debarred or suspended status. Effect: Amounts could be paid to parties that are debarred, suspended or otherwise excluded. Repeat Finding: Yes Recommendation: We recommend that management enhance the procurement controls to ensure that all required parties are reviewed for suspension and debarment prior to entering the transaction. Views of responsible officials: The County agrees with the findings. Corrective action plan: The County has developed a formal policy, which has been distributed to all departments. The policy is scheduled to take effect in Fiscal Year 2024–2025.