Audit 36325

FY End
2022-09-30
Total Expended
$3.57M
Findings
4
Programs
13
Organization: Alternatives for Girls (MI)
Year: 2022 Accepted: 2023-06-23

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
33631 2022-001 Significant Deficiency - B
33632 2022-001 Significant Deficiency - B
610073 2022-001 Significant Deficiency - B
610074 2022-001 Significant Deficiency - B

Contacts

Name Title Type
GU6PNN4SSUP4 Amanda Good Auditee
3133614000 Michael R. Nicholas, C.p.a. Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Accounting Policies: The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards presents the activity of federal award programs of Alternatives For Girls ("AFG"). Federal awards received directly from federal agencies, as well as federal awards passed through other agencies, are included on this schedule. / Basis of Presentation / The information in the accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations ("CFR") Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the "Uniform Guidance"). Because this schedule presents only a selected portion of AFG's operations, it is not intended to, and does not, present the financial position, changes in net assets, or cash flows of AFG. / Basis of Accounting / The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards is presented using the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, in which certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimis cost rate.

Finding Details

Condition and Context: When testing the allowable costs for the Affordable Care Act Personal Responsibility Education Program for the year ended September 30, 2022, we selected a sample of 40 disbursements. Three of these 40 disbursements were credit card purchases totaling $342 for which supporting receipts could not be located, and another one of these 40 disbursements was a credit card purchase for $15 relating to another program that was misclassified as an allowable cost for the Affordable Care Act Personal Responsibility Education Program. / Criteria: All related documentation used as a basis for claiming costs under federal awards must be retained for audit in accordance with the record retention requirements contained in 2 CFR 200.333. Direct costs should be identified specifically with a particular final cost objective, such as a federal award, or with other internally or externally funded activity, or should be directly assigned to such activities relatively easily with a high degree of accuracy. / Effect: Total federal expenditures of $357 were identified as questionable costs. This may also indicate other credit card expenditures that may have been charged to federal awards that were not supported or that may have been misclassified to that federal award. / Cause: According to the management of Alternatives For Girls ("AFG"), the employee who made the credit card purchases submitted the actual receipts in hard copy to AFG's finance staff in place at the time. However, AFG's finance department had significant turnover during the year ended September 30, 2022, and the current finance department team could not locate the receipts. / Questioned Costs: Known and likely questioned costs are less than $10,000. / Recommendation: We recommend that management strengthen its processes for processing, reviewing, approving, and classifying credit card purchases, as well as maintaining documentation to support such transactions.
Condition and Context: When testing the allowable costs for the Affordable Care Act Personal Responsibility Education Program for the year ended September 30, 2022, we selected a sample of 40 disbursements. Three of these 40 disbursements were credit card purchases totaling $342 for which supporting receipts could not be located, and another one of these 40 disbursements was a credit card purchase for $15 relating to another program that was misclassified as an allowable cost for the Affordable Care Act Personal Responsibility Education Program. / Criteria: All related documentation used as a basis for claiming costs under federal awards must be retained for audit in accordance with the record retention requirements contained in 2 CFR 200.333. Direct costs should be identified specifically with a particular final cost objective, such as a federal award, or with other internally or externally funded activity, or should be directly assigned to such activities relatively easily with a high degree of accuracy. / Effect: Total federal expenditures of $357 were identified as questionable costs. This may also indicate other credit card expenditures that may have been charged to federal awards that were not supported or that may have been misclassified to that federal award. / Cause: According to the management of Alternatives For Girls ("AFG"), the employee who made the credit card purchases submitted the actual receipts in hard copy to AFG's finance staff in place at the time. However, AFG's finance department had significant turnover during the year ended September 30, 2022, and the current finance department team could not locate the receipts. / Questioned Costs: Known and likely questioned costs are less than $10,000. / Recommendation: We recommend that management strengthen its processes for processing, reviewing, approving, and classifying credit card purchases, as well as maintaining documentation to support such transactions.
Condition and Context: When testing the allowable costs for the Affordable Care Act Personal Responsibility Education Program for the year ended September 30, 2022, we selected a sample of 40 disbursements. Three of these 40 disbursements were credit card purchases totaling $342 for which supporting receipts could not be located, and another one of these 40 disbursements was a credit card purchase for $15 relating to another program that was misclassified as an allowable cost for the Affordable Care Act Personal Responsibility Education Program. / Criteria: All related documentation used as a basis for claiming costs under federal awards must be retained for audit in accordance with the record retention requirements contained in 2 CFR 200.333. Direct costs should be identified specifically with a particular final cost objective, such as a federal award, or with other internally or externally funded activity, or should be directly assigned to such activities relatively easily with a high degree of accuracy. / Effect: Total federal expenditures of $357 were identified as questionable costs. This may also indicate other credit card expenditures that may have been charged to federal awards that were not supported or that may have been misclassified to that federal award. / Cause: According to the management of Alternatives For Girls ("AFG"), the employee who made the credit card purchases submitted the actual receipts in hard copy to AFG's finance staff in place at the time. However, AFG's finance department had significant turnover during the year ended September 30, 2022, and the current finance department team could not locate the receipts. / Questioned Costs: Known and likely questioned costs are less than $10,000. / Recommendation: We recommend that management strengthen its processes for processing, reviewing, approving, and classifying credit card purchases, as well as maintaining documentation to support such transactions.
Condition and Context: When testing the allowable costs for the Affordable Care Act Personal Responsibility Education Program for the year ended September 30, 2022, we selected a sample of 40 disbursements. Three of these 40 disbursements were credit card purchases totaling $342 for which supporting receipts could not be located, and another one of these 40 disbursements was a credit card purchase for $15 relating to another program that was misclassified as an allowable cost for the Affordable Care Act Personal Responsibility Education Program. / Criteria: All related documentation used as a basis for claiming costs under federal awards must be retained for audit in accordance with the record retention requirements contained in 2 CFR 200.333. Direct costs should be identified specifically with a particular final cost objective, such as a federal award, or with other internally or externally funded activity, or should be directly assigned to such activities relatively easily with a high degree of accuracy. / Effect: Total federal expenditures of $357 were identified as questionable costs. This may also indicate other credit card expenditures that may have been charged to federal awards that were not supported or that may have been misclassified to that federal award. / Cause: According to the management of Alternatives For Girls ("AFG"), the employee who made the credit card purchases submitted the actual receipts in hard copy to AFG's finance staff in place at the time. However, AFG's finance department had significant turnover during the year ended September 30, 2022, and the current finance department team could not locate the receipts. / Questioned Costs: Known and likely questioned costs are less than $10,000. / Recommendation: We recommend that management strengthen its processes for processing, reviewing, approving, and classifying credit card purchases, as well as maintaining documentation to support such transactions.