Audit 363112

FY End
2024-12-31
Total Expended
$17.84M
Findings
2
Programs
20
Organization: United Community Center, Inc. (WI)
Year: 2024 Accepted: 2025-07-28

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
572005 2024-003 Material Weakness - B
1148447 2024-003 Material Weakness - B

Contacts

Name Title Type
MS7BKH4LXQK1 William Gruver Auditee
4143842345 Ryan Lay Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Basis of Presentation Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Negative amounts shown on the Schedule represent adjustments or credits made in the normal course of business to amounts reported as expenditures in prior years. Pass-through entity identifying numbers are presented where applicable. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Organization has elected not to use the de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal and state awards (the Schedule) includes the federal and state award activity of United Community Center, Inc. and Affiliate (the Organization) under programs of the federal and state government for the year ended December 31, 2024. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the Organization, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net assets or cash flows of the Organization.
Title: Family Care Program Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Negative amounts shown on the Schedule represent adjustments or credits made in the normal course of business to amounts reported as expenditures in prior years. Pass-through entity identifying numbers are presented where applicable. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Organization has elected not to use the de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance. The Organization also received the following funding from the Milwaukee County Department of Family Care under the Wisconsin Family Care Program. Adult Day Care Program $ 473,174 Care Management Services 1,541,150 Total Family Care Program $ 2,014,324 The Wisconsin Family Care Program is funded by a combination of Federal Medical Assistance and state of Wisconsin funding; however, the Wisconsin Department of Health Services does not consider the program to be federal or state financial assistance and has concluded that the Uniform Guidance and the State Single Audit Guidelines are not applicable. Therefore, the above payments are not included in the schedules of expenditures of federal and state awards. The Organization has presented additional reserve supplemental schedules within the supplemental information on program revenues and expenses in accordance with the Milwaukee County Department of Family Care contract.
Title: Subrecipients Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Negative amounts shown on the Schedule represent adjustments or credits made in the normal course of business to amounts reported as expenditures in prior years. Pass-through entity identifying numbers are presented where applicable. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Organization has elected not to use the de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance. The Organization did not have any subrecipient expenditures for the year ended December 31, 2024.

Finding Details

Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Assistance Listing Number: 93.243, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Criteria: The Organization is required to maintain effective internal controls over compliance to support that amounts charged to federal contracts for reimbursement represent actual costs incurred. Expenditures charged to grants should be properly recorded and accounted for in order to permit the preparation of reliable financial statements and federal reports. Statement of Condition: The Organization over allocated an employee's time to the program during the current year. The Organization's internal controls over compliance did not detect and correct the amounts requested for reimbursement. Questioned Costs: The known questioned costs are $5,740. Context: We tested forty individual transactions that charged payroll to the program. The forty transactions tested consisted of time charged by nine employees. A total of twenty-eight employees charged time to the program. Of the employees tested, one employee was miscalculated by management resulting in incorrect amounts being charged to the program. The sample size was not a statistical sample. Effect: The Organization charged more to the program for the employee for reimbursement than was allowable. Cause: The Organization did not have effective controls in place to review and approve payroll allocations and expenditures charged to programs and additional expenses were submitted. Recommendation: The Organization should review their internal control processes to ensure timely review and approval of all payroll related allocations and expenditures, including those charged to grants, to facilitate accurate financial and grant reporting. Management's Response: The Organization acknowledges the finding. This was an isolated clerical error made by the staff responsible for preparing the reimbursement documentation. Although an employee already fully allocated to other programs was mistakenly included in the claim, the Organization had sufficient allowable personnel expenses from other staff who were not fully allocated to federal programs. These resources could have been properly used to support the claim. Program operations continued without disruption and were not affected in any way, as there were adequate personnel costs available to sustain the program throughout the period. To prevent recurrence, the Organization is reviewing and strengthening its internal review procedures related to grant allocations and payroll backup. Additional training and oversight will be provided to ensure that future claims are accurately supported by allowable personnel costs.
Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Assistance Listing Number: 93.243, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Criteria: The Organization is required to maintain effective internal controls over compliance to support that amounts charged to federal contracts for reimbursement represent actual costs incurred. Expenditures charged to grants should be properly recorded and accounted for in order to permit the preparation of reliable financial statements and federal reports. Statement of Condition: The Organization over allocated an employee's time to the program during the current year. The Organization's internal controls over compliance did not detect and correct the amounts requested for reimbursement. Questioned Costs: The known questioned costs are $5,740. Context: We tested forty individual transactions that charged payroll to the program. The forty transactions tested consisted of time charged by nine employees. A total of twenty-eight employees charged time to the program. Of the employees tested, one employee was miscalculated by management resulting in incorrect amounts being charged to the program. The sample size was not a statistical sample. Effect: The Organization charged more to the program for the employee for reimbursement than was allowable. Cause: The Organization did not have effective controls in place to review and approve payroll allocations and expenditures charged to programs and additional expenses were submitted. Recommendation: The Organization should review their internal control processes to ensure timely review and approval of all payroll related allocations and expenditures, including those charged to grants, to facilitate accurate financial and grant reporting. Management's Response: The Organization acknowledges the finding. This was an isolated clerical error made by the staff responsible for preparing the reimbursement documentation. Although an employee already fully allocated to other programs was mistakenly included in the claim, the Organization had sufficient allowable personnel expenses from other staff who were not fully allocated to federal programs. These resources could have been properly used to support the claim. Program operations continued without disruption and were not affected in any way, as there were adequate personnel costs available to sustain the program throughout the period. To prevent recurrence, the Organization is reviewing and strengthening its internal review procedures related to grant allocations and payroll backup. Additional training and oversight will be provided to ensure that future claims are accurately supported by allowable personnel costs.