Audit 362615

Criteria or Specific Requirements: Per Title 7, Code of Federal Regulations, Subtitle B, Chapter II, Subchapter A, Parts 210.8 and 220.11, School Food Authorities (SFA) must establish internal controls which ensure the accuracy of meal counts prior to the submission of the monthly Claim for Reimbursement. Prior to submission of a monthly Claim for Reimbursement, each school food authority shall review the breakfast and lunch count data for each school under its jurisdiction to ensure the accuracy of the monthly Claim for Reimbursement. The objective of this review is to ensure that monthly claims include only the number of free, reduced price and paid breakfasts and lunches served on any day of operation to children currently eligible for such meals. SFA staff shall maintain on file each month’s Claim for Reimbursement and all data used in the claims review process, by school. The above-noted CFR section also states that the SFA shall compare each school’s daily counts of meals serve against the product of the number of children in that school currently eligible for free, reduced price and paid lunches, respectively, times an attendance factor. Per Title 7, Code of Federal Regulations, Subtitle B, Chapter II, Subchapter A, Parts 210.8 and 220.11, SFA must submit monthly claims for reimbursement for meals and snacks served to eligible students within 60 days following the last day of the month covered by the claim. Condition The District did not have sufficient controls in place to ensure that monthly Claims for Reimbursement accurately reflected the numbers of meals served. There is no indication that a second person reviews data submissions. We noted discrepancies between the daily meal counts and the monthly Claims for Reimbursement. The system reports provided to the auditor for the 12 months selected for testing did not agree to the meal counts reported on the Claims for Reimbursement. Discrepancies included the misclassification of 1,665 lunch meals served. Misstatement of the number of lunch meals served resulted in overstatement revenue of $7,109. The District did not have sufficient controls in place to ensure that monthly Claims for Reimbursement accurately reflected the numbers of meals served. We noted discrepancies between the daily meal counts and the monthly Claims for Reimbursement. During the audit year, the District did not use a point-of-sale (POS) system to track meals served. There was no analytical review or edit check performed to determine reasonableness of meal counts, such as comparing the number of students enrolled to the number of meals served on a daily basis by site. Such analysis would allow staff to identify possible errors timely and in advance of filing a claim. Although not required, a POS system would automate these analyses, allowing for greater staff efficiencies and accuracy. Cause The condition identified appears to have materialized due to the District’s lack of established procedures to ensure compliance with the requirements under Title 7, Code of Federal Regulations, Subtitle B, Chapter II, Subchapter A, Parts 210.8 and 220.11. Effect The District has not complied with the requirements identified in Title 7, Code of Federal Regulations, Subtitle B, Chapter II, Subchapter A, Parts 210.8 and 220.11. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs associated with the identified condition. Context/Sampling The condition was identified through inquiry with District personnel and through review of available supporting documentation for the monthly Claims for Reimbursement. A nonstatistical sample of 12 months out of 12 months was selected for reporting testing. Condition The District did not have sufficient controls in place to ensure that monthly Claims for Reimbursement accurately reflected the numbers of meals served. There is no indication that a second person reviews data submissions. We noted discrepancies between the daily meal counts and the monthly Claims for Reimbursement. The system reports provided to the auditor for the 12 months selected for testing did not agree to the meal counts reported on the Claims for Reimbursement. Discrepancies included the misclassification of 1,665 lunch meals served. Misstatement of the number of lunch meals served resulted in overstatement revenue of $7,109. The District did not have sufficient controls in place to ensure that monthly Claims for Reimbursement accurately reflected the numbers of meals served. We noted discrepancies between the daily meal counts and the monthly Claims for Reimbursement. During the audit year, the District did not use a point-of-sale (POS) system to track meals served. There was no analytical review or edit check performed to determine reasonableness of meal counts, such as comparing the number of students enrolled to the number of meals served on a daily basis by site. Such analysis would allow staff to identify possible errors timely and in advance of filing a claim. Although not required, a POS system would automate these analyses, allowing for greater staff efficiencies and accuracy. Cause The condition identified appears to have materialized due to the District’s lack of established procedures to ensure compliance with the requirements under Title 7, Code of Federal Regulations, Subtitle B, Chapter II, Subchapter A, Parts 210.8 and 220.11. Effect The District has not complied with the requirements identified in Title 7, Code of Federal Regulations, Subtitle B, Chapter II, Subchapter A, Parts 210.8 and 220.11. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs associated with the identified condition. Context/Sampling The condition was identified through inquiry with District personnel and through review of available supporting documentation for the monthly Claims for Reimbursement. A nonstatistical sample of 12 months out of 12 months was selected for reporting testing.

Criteria or Specific Requirements: Per Title 7, Code of Federal Regulations, Subtitle B, Chapter II, Subchapter A, Parts 210.8 and 220.11, School Food Authorities (SFA) must establish internal controls which ensure the accuracy of meal counts prior to the submission of the monthly Claim for Reimbursement. Prior to submission of a monthly Claim for Reimbursement, each school food authority shall review the breakfast and lunch count data for each school under its jurisdiction to ensure the accuracy of the monthly Claim for Reimbursement. The objective of this review is to ensure that monthly claims include only the number of free, reduced price and paid breakfasts and lunches served on any day of operation to children currently eligible for such meals. SFA staff shall maintain on file each month’s Claim for Reimbursement and all data used in the claims review process, by school. The above-noted CFR section also states that the SFA shall compare each school’s daily counts of meals serve against the product of the number of children in that school currently eligible for free, reduced price and paid lunches, respectively, times an attendance factor. Per Title 7, Code of Federal Regulations, Subtitle B, Chapter II, Subchapter A, Parts 210.8 and 220.11, SFA must submit monthly claims for reimbursement for meals and snacks served to eligible students within 60 days following the last day of the month covered by the claim. Condition The District did not have sufficient controls in place to ensure that monthly Claims for Reimbursement accurately reflected the numbers of meals served. There is no indication that a second person reviews data submissions. We noted discrepancies between the daily meal counts and the monthly Claims for Reimbursement. The system reports provided to the auditor for the 12 months selected for testing did not agree to the meal counts reported on the Claims for Reimbursement. Discrepancies included the misclassification of 1,665 lunch meals served. Misstatement of the number of lunch meals served resulted in overstatement revenue of $7,109. The District did not have sufficient controls in place to ensure that monthly Claims for Reimbursement accurately reflected the numbers of meals served. We noted discrepancies between the daily meal counts and the monthly Claims for Reimbursement. During the audit year, the District did not use a point-of-sale (POS) system to track meals served. There was no analytical review or edit check performed to determine reasonableness of meal counts, such as comparing the number of students enrolled to the number of meals served on a daily basis by site. Such analysis would allow staff to identify possible errors timely and in advance of filing a claim. Although not required, a POS system would automate these analyses, allowing for greater staff efficiencies and accuracy. Cause The condition identified appears to have materialized due to the District’s lack of established procedures to ensure compliance with the requirements under Title 7, Code of Federal Regulations, Subtitle B, Chapter II, Subchapter A, Parts 210.8 and 220.11. Effect The District has not complied with the requirements identified in Title 7, Code of Federal Regulations, Subtitle B, Chapter II, Subchapter A, Parts 210.8 and 220.11. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs associated with the identified condition. Context/Sampling The condition was identified through inquiry with District personnel and through review of available supporting documentation for the monthly Claims for Reimbursement. A nonstatistical sample of 12 months out of 12 months was selected for reporting testing. Condition The District did not have sufficient controls in place to ensure that monthly Claims for Reimbursement accurately reflected the numbers of meals served. There is no indication that a second person reviews data submissions. We noted discrepancies between the daily meal counts and the monthly Claims for Reimbursement. The system reports provided to the auditor for the 12 months selected for testing did not agree to the meal counts reported on the Claims for Reimbursement. Discrepancies included the misclassification of 1,665 lunch meals served. Misstatement of the number of lunch meals served resulted in overstatement revenue of $7,109. The District did not have sufficient controls in place to ensure that monthly Claims for Reimbursement accurately reflected the numbers of meals served. We noted discrepancies between the daily meal counts and the monthly Claims for Reimbursement. During the audit year, the District did not use a point-of-sale (POS) system to track meals served. There was no analytical review or edit check performed to determine reasonableness of meal counts, such as comparing the number of students enrolled to the number of meals served on a daily basis by site. Such analysis would allow staff to identify possible errors timely and in advance of filing a claim. Although not required, a POS system would automate these analyses, allowing for greater staff efficiencies and accuracy. Cause The condition identified appears to have materialized due to the District’s lack of established procedures to ensure compliance with the requirements under Title 7, Code of Federal Regulations, Subtitle B, Chapter II, Subchapter A, Parts 210.8 and 220.11. Effect The District has not complied with the requirements identified in Title 7, Code of Federal Regulations, Subtitle B, Chapter II, Subchapter A, Parts 210.8 and 220.11. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs associated with the identified condition. Context/Sampling The condition was identified through inquiry with District personnel and through review of available supporting documentation for the monthly Claims for Reimbursement. A nonstatistical sample of 12 months out of 12 months was selected for reporting testing.

Criteria or Specific Requirements: Per Title 7, Code of Federal Regulations, Subtitle B, Chapter II, Subchapter A, Parts 210.8 and 220.11, School Food Authorities (SFA) must establish internal controls which ensure the accuracy of meal counts prior to the submission of the monthly Claim for Reimbursement. Prior to submission of a monthly Claim for Reimbursement, each school food authority shall review the breakfast and lunch count data for each school under its jurisdiction to ensure the accuracy of the monthly Claim for Reimbursement. The objective of this review is to ensure that monthly claims include only the number of free, reduced price and paid breakfasts and lunches served on any day of operation to children currently eligible for such meals. SFA staff shall maintain on file each month’s Claim for Reimbursement and all data used in the claims review process, by school. The above-noted CFR section also states that the SFA shall compare each school’s daily counts of meals serve against the product of the number of children in that school currently eligible for free, reduced price and paid lunches, respectively, times an attendance factor. Per Title 7, Code of Federal Regulations, Subtitle B, Chapter II, Subchapter A, Parts 210.8 and 220.11, SFA must submit monthly claims for reimbursement for meals and snacks served to eligible students within 60 days following the last day of the month covered by the claim. Condition The District did not have sufficient controls in place to ensure that monthly Claims for Reimbursement accurately reflected the numbers of meals served. There is no indication that a second person reviews data submissions. We noted discrepancies between the daily meal counts and the monthly Claims for Reimbursement. The system reports provided to the auditor for the 12 months selected for testing did not agree to the meal counts reported on the Claims for Reimbursement. Discrepancies included the misclassification of 1,665 lunch meals served. Misstatement of the number of lunch meals served resulted in overstatement revenue of $7,109. The District did not have sufficient controls in place to ensure that monthly Claims for Reimbursement accurately reflected the numbers of meals served. We noted discrepancies between the daily meal counts and the monthly Claims for Reimbursement. During the audit year, the District did not use a point-of-sale (POS) system to track meals served. There was no analytical review or edit check performed to determine reasonableness of meal counts, such as comparing the number of students enrolled to the number of meals served on a daily basis by site. Such analysis would allow staff to identify possible errors timely and in advance of filing a claim. Although not required, a POS system would automate these analyses, allowing for greater staff efficiencies and accuracy. Cause The condition identified appears to have materialized due to the District’s lack of established procedures to ensure compliance with the requirements under Title 7, Code of Federal Regulations, Subtitle B, Chapter II, Subchapter A, Parts 210.8 and 220.11. Effect The District has not complied with the requirements identified in Title 7, Code of Federal Regulations, Subtitle B, Chapter II, Subchapter A, Parts 210.8 and 220.11. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs associated with the identified condition. Context/Sampling The condition was identified through inquiry with District personnel and through review of available supporting documentation for the monthly Claims for Reimbursement. A nonstatistical sample of 12 months out of 12 months was selected for reporting testing. Condition The District did not have sufficient controls in place to ensure that monthly Claims for Reimbursement accurately reflected the numbers of meals served. There is no indication that a second person reviews data submissions. We noted discrepancies between the daily meal counts and the monthly Claims for Reimbursement. The system reports provided to the auditor for the 12 months selected for testing did not agree to the meal counts reported on the Claims for Reimbursement. Discrepancies included the misclassification of 1,665 lunch meals served. Misstatement of the number of lunch meals served resulted in overstatement revenue of $7,109. The District did not have sufficient controls in place to ensure that monthly Claims for Reimbursement accurately reflected the numbers of meals served. We noted discrepancies between the daily meal counts and the monthly Claims for Reimbursement. During the audit year, the District did not use a point-of-sale (POS) system to track meals served. There was no analytical review or edit check performed to determine reasonableness of meal counts, such as comparing the number of students enrolled to the number of meals served on a daily basis by site. Such analysis would allow staff to identify possible errors timely and in advance of filing a claim. Although not required, a POS system would automate these analyses, allowing for greater staff efficiencies and accuracy. Cause The condition identified appears to have materialized due to the District’s lack of established procedures to ensure compliance with the requirements under Title 7, Code of Federal Regulations, Subtitle B, Chapter II, Subchapter A, Parts 210.8 and 220.11. Effect The District has not complied with the requirements identified in Title 7, Code of Federal Regulations, Subtitle B, Chapter II, Subchapter A, Parts 210.8 and 220.11. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs associated with the identified condition. Context/Sampling The condition was identified through inquiry with District personnel and through review of available supporting documentation for the monthly Claims for Reimbursement. A nonstatistical sample of 12 months out of 12 months was selected for reporting testing.

Criteria or Specific Requirements: Per Title 7, Code of Federal Regulations, Subtitle B, Chapter II, Subchapter A, Parts 210.8 and 220.11, School Food Authorities (SFA) must establish internal controls which ensure the accuracy of meal counts prior to the submission of the monthly Claim for Reimbursement. Prior to submission of a monthly Claim for Reimbursement, each school food authority shall review the breakfast and lunch count data for each school under its jurisdiction to ensure the accuracy of the monthly Claim for Reimbursement. The objective of this review is to ensure that monthly claims include only the number of free, reduced price and paid breakfasts and lunches served on any day of operation to children currently eligible for such meals. SFA staff shall maintain on file each month’s Claim for Reimbursement and all data used in the claims review process, by school. The above-noted CFR section also states that the SFA shall compare each school’s daily counts of meals serve against the product of the number of children in that school currently eligible for free, reduced price and paid lunches, respectively, times an attendance factor. Per Title 7, Code of Federal Regulations, Subtitle B, Chapter II, Subchapter A, Parts 210.8 and 220.11, SFA must submit monthly claims for reimbursement for meals and snacks served to eligible students within 60 days following the last day of the month covered by the claim. Condition The District did not have sufficient controls in place to ensure that monthly Claims for Reimbursement accurately reflected the numbers of meals served. There is no indication that a second person reviews data submissions. We noted discrepancies between the daily meal counts and the monthly Claims for Reimbursement. The system reports provided to the auditor for the 12 months selected for testing did not agree to the meal counts reported on the Claims for Reimbursement. Discrepancies included the misclassification of 1,665 lunch meals served. Misstatement of the number of lunch meals served resulted in overstatement revenue of $7,109. The District did not have sufficient controls in place to ensure that monthly Claims for Reimbursement accurately reflected the numbers of meals served. We noted discrepancies between the daily meal counts and the monthly Claims for Reimbursement. During the audit year, the District did not use a point-of-sale (POS) system to track meals served. There was no analytical review or edit check performed to determine reasonableness of meal counts, such as comparing the number of students enrolled to the number of meals served on a daily basis by site. Such analysis would allow staff to identify possible errors timely and in advance of filing a claim. Although not required, a POS system would automate these analyses, allowing for greater staff efficiencies and accuracy. Cause The condition identified appears to have materialized due to the District’s lack of established procedures to ensure compliance with the requirements under Title 7, Code of Federal Regulations, Subtitle B, Chapter II, Subchapter A, Parts 210.8 and 220.11. Effect The District has not complied with the requirements identified in Title 7, Code of Federal Regulations, Subtitle B, Chapter II, Subchapter A, Parts 210.8 and 220.11. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs associated with the identified condition. Context/Sampling The condition was identified through inquiry with District personnel and through review of available supporting documentation for the monthly Claims for Reimbursement. A nonstatistical sample of 12 months out of 12 months was selected for reporting testing. Condition The District did not have sufficient controls in place to ensure that monthly Claims for Reimbursement accurately reflected the numbers of meals served. There is no indication that a second person reviews data submissions. We noted discrepancies between the daily meal counts and the monthly Claims for Reimbursement. The system reports provided to the auditor for the 12 months selected for testing did not agree to the meal counts reported on the Claims for Reimbursement. Discrepancies included the misclassification of 1,665 lunch meals served. Misstatement of the number of lunch meals served resulted in overstatement revenue of $7,109. The District did not have sufficient controls in place to ensure that monthly Claims for Reimbursement accurately reflected the numbers of meals served. We noted discrepancies between the daily meal counts and the monthly Claims for Reimbursement. During the audit year, the District did not use a point-of-sale (POS) system to track meals served. There was no analytical review or edit check performed to determine reasonableness of meal counts, such as comparing the number of students enrolled to the number of meals served on a daily basis by site. Such analysis would allow staff to identify possible errors timely and in advance of filing a claim. Although not required, a POS system would automate these analyses, allowing for greater staff efficiencies and accuracy. Cause The condition identified appears to have materialized due to the District’s lack of established procedures to ensure compliance with the requirements under Title 7, Code of Federal Regulations, Subtitle B, Chapter II, Subchapter A, Parts 210.8 and 220.11. Effect The District has not complied with the requirements identified in Title 7, Code of Federal Regulations, Subtitle B, Chapter II, Subchapter A, Parts 210.8 and 220.11. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs associated with the identified condition. Context/Sampling The condition was identified through inquiry with District personnel and through review of available supporting documentation for the monthly Claims for Reimbursement. A nonstatistical sample of 12 months out of 12 months was selected for reporting testing.

Criteria or Specific Requirements: Per Title 7, Code of Federal Regulations, Subtitle B, Chapter II, Subchapter A, Parts 210.8 and 220.11, School Food Authorities (SFA) must establish internal controls which ensure the accuracy of meal counts prior to the submission of the monthly Claim for Reimbursement. Prior to submission of a monthly Claim for Reimbursement, each school food authority shall review the breakfast and lunch count data for each school under its jurisdiction to ensure the accuracy of the monthly Claim for Reimbursement. The objective of this review is to ensure that monthly claims include only the number of free, reduced price and paid breakfasts and lunches served on any day of operation to children currently eligible for such meals. SFA staff shall maintain on file each month’s Claim for Reimbursement and all data used in the claims review process, by school. The above-noted CFR section also states that the SFA shall compare each school’s daily counts of meals serve against the product of the number of children in that school currently eligible for free, reduced price and paid lunches, respectively, times an attendance factor. Per Title 7, Code of Federal Regulations, Subtitle B, Chapter II, Subchapter A, Parts 210.8 and 220.11, SFA must submit monthly claims for reimbursement for meals and snacks served to eligible students within 60 days following the last day of the month covered by the claim. Condition The District did not have sufficient controls in place to ensure that monthly Claims for Reimbursement accurately reflected the numbers of meals served. There is no indication that a second person reviews data submissions. We noted discrepancies between the daily meal counts and the monthly Claims for Reimbursement. The system reports provided to the auditor for the 12 months selected for testing did not agree to the meal counts reported on the Claims for Reimbursement. Discrepancies included the misclassification of 1,665 lunch meals served. Misstatement of the number of lunch meals served resulted in overstatement revenue of $7,109. The District did not have sufficient controls in place to ensure that monthly Claims for Reimbursement accurately reflected the numbers of meals served. We noted discrepancies between the daily meal counts and the monthly Claims for Reimbursement. During the audit year, the District did not use a point-of-sale (POS) system to track meals served. There was no analytical review or edit check performed to determine reasonableness of meal counts, such as comparing the number of students enrolled to the number of meals served on a daily basis by site. Such analysis would allow staff to identify possible errors timely and in advance of filing a claim. Although not required, a POS system would automate these analyses, allowing for greater staff efficiencies and accuracy. Cause The condition identified appears to have materialized due to the District’s lack of established procedures to ensure compliance with the requirements under Title 7, Code of Federal Regulations, Subtitle B, Chapter II, Subchapter A, Parts 210.8 and 220.11. Effect The District has not complied with the requirements identified in Title 7, Code of Federal Regulations, Subtitle B, Chapter II, Subchapter A, Parts 210.8 and 220.11. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs associated with the identified condition. Context/Sampling The condition was identified through inquiry with District personnel and through review of available supporting documentation for the monthly Claims for Reimbursement. A nonstatistical sample of 12 months out of 12 months was selected for reporting testing. Condition The District did not have sufficient controls in place to ensure that monthly Claims for Reimbursement accurately reflected the numbers of meals served. There is no indication that a second person reviews data submissions. We noted discrepancies between the daily meal counts and the monthly Claims for Reimbursement. The system reports provided to the auditor for the 12 months selected for testing did not agree to the meal counts reported on the Claims for Reimbursement. Discrepancies included the misclassification of 1,665 lunch meals served. Misstatement of the number of lunch meals served resulted in overstatement revenue of $7,109. The District did not have sufficient controls in place to ensure that monthly Claims for Reimbursement accurately reflected the numbers of meals served. We noted discrepancies between the daily meal counts and the monthly Claims for Reimbursement. During the audit year, the District did not use a point-of-sale (POS) system to track meals served. There was no analytical review or edit check performed to determine reasonableness of meal counts, such as comparing the number of students enrolled to the number of meals served on a daily basis by site. Such analysis would allow staff to identify possible errors timely and in advance of filing a claim. Although not required, a POS system would automate these analyses, allowing for greater staff efficiencies and accuracy. Cause The condition identified appears to have materialized due to the District’s lack of established procedures to ensure compliance with the requirements under Title 7, Code of Federal Regulations, Subtitle B, Chapter II, Subchapter A, Parts 210.8 and 220.11. Effect The District has not complied with the requirements identified in Title 7, Code of Federal Regulations, Subtitle B, Chapter II, Subchapter A, Parts 210.8 and 220.11. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs associated with the identified condition. Context/Sampling The condition was identified through inquiry with District personnel and through review of available supporting documentation for the monthly Claims for Reimbursement. A nonstatistical sample of 12 months out of 12 months was selected for reporting testing.

Criteria or Specific Requirements: Per Title 7, Code of Federal Regulations, Subtitle B, Chapter II, Subchapter A, Parts 210.8 and 220.11, School Food Authorities (SFA) must establish internal controls which ensure the accuracy of meal counts prior to the submission of the monthly Claim for Reimbursement. Prior to submission of a monthly Claim for Reimbursement, each school food authority shall review the breakfast and lunch count data for each school under its jurisdiction to ensure the accuracy of the monthly Claim for Reimbursement. The objective of this review is to ensure that monthly claims include only the number of free, reduced price and paid breakfasts and lunches served on any day of operation to children currently eligible for such meals. SFA staff shall maintain on file each month’s Claim for Reimbursement and all data used in the claims review process, by school. The above-noted CFR section also states that the SFA shall compare each school’s daily counts of meals serve against the product of the number of children in that school currently eligible for free, reduced price and paid lunches, respectively, times an attendance factor. Per Title 7, Code of Federal Regulations, Subtitle B, Chapter II, Subchapter A, Parts 210.8 and 220.11, SFA must submit monthly claims for reimbursement for meals and snacks served to eligible students within 60 days following the last day of the month covered by the claim. Condition The District did not have sufficient controls in place to ensure that monthly Claims for Reimbursement accurately reflected the numbers of meals served. There is no indication that a second person reviews data submissions. We noted discrepancies between the daily meal counts and the monthly Claims for Reimbursement. The system reports provided to the auditor for the 12 months selected for testing did not agree to the meal counts reported on the Claims for Reimbursement. Discrepancies included the misclassification of 1,665 lunch meals served. Misstatement of the number of lunch meals served resulted in overstatement revenue of $7,109. The District did not have sufficient controls in place to ensure that monthly Claims for Reimbursement accurately reflected the numbers of meals served. We noted discrepancies between the daily meal counts and the monthly Claims for Reimbursement. During the audit year, the District did not use a point-of-sale (POS) system to track meals served. There was no analytical review or edit check performed to determine reasonableness of meal counts, such as comparing the number of students enrolled to the number of meals served on a daily basis by site. Such analysis would allow staff to identify possible errors timely and in advance of filing a claim. Although not required, a POS system would automate these analyses, allowing for greater staff efficiencies and accuracy. Cause The condition identified appears to have materialized due to the District’s lack of established procedures to ensure compliance with the requirements under Title 7, Code of Federal Regulations, Subtitle B, Chapter II, Subchapter A, Parts 210.8 and 220.11. Effect The District has not complied with the requirements identified in Title 7, Code of Federal Regulations, Subtitle B, Chapter II, Subchapter A, Parts 210.8 and 220.11. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs associated with the identified condition. Context/Sampling The condition was identified through inquiry with District personnel and through review of available supporting documentation for the monthly Claims for Reimbursement. A nonstatistical sample of 12 months out of 12 months was selected for reporting testing. Condition The District did not have sufficient controls in place to ensure that monthly Claims for Reimbursement accurately reflected the numbers of meals served. There is no indication that a second person reviews data submissions. We noted discrepancies between the daily meal counts and the monthly Claims for Reimbursement. The system reports provided to the auditor for the 12 months selected for testing did not agree to the meal counts reported on the Claims for Reimbursement. Discrepancies included the misclassification of 1,665 lunch meals served. Misstatement of the number of lunch meals served resulted in overstatement revenue of $7,109. The District did not have sufficient controls in place to ensure that monthly Claims for Reimbursement accurately reflected the numbers of meals served. We noted discrepancies between the daily meal counts and the monthly Claims for Reimbursement. During the audit year, the District did not use a point-of-sale (POS) system to track meals served. There was no analytical review or edit check performed to determine reasonableness of meal counts, such as comparing the number of students enrolled to the number of meals served on a daily basis by site. Such analysis would allow staff to identify possible errors timely and in advance of filing a claim. Although not required, a POS system would automate these analyses, allowing for greater staff efficiencies and accuracy. Cause The condition identified appears to have materialized due to the District’s lack of established procedures to ensure compliance with the requirements under Title 7, Code of Federal Regulations, Subtitle B, Chapter II, Subchapter A, Parts 210.8 and 220.11. Effect The District has not complied with the requirements identified in Title 7, Code of Federal Regulations, Subtitle B, Chapter II, Subchapter A, Parts 210.8 and 220.11. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs associated with the identified condition. Context/Sampling The condition was identified through inquiry with District personnel and through review of available supporting documentation for the monthly Claims for Reimbursement. A nonstatistical sample of 12 months out of 12 months was selected for reporting testing.

Criteria or Specific Requirements: Per Title 7, Code of Federal Regulations, Subtitle B, Chapter II, Subchapter A, Parts 210.8 and 220.11, School Food Authorities (SFA) must establish internal controls which ensure the accuracy of meal counts prior to the submission of the monthly Claim for Reimbursement. Prior to submission of a monthly Claim for Reimbursement, each school food authority shall review the breakfast and lunch count data for each school under its jurisdiction to ensure the accuracy of the monthly Claim for Reimbursement. The objective of this review is to ensure that monthly claims include only the number of free, reduced price and paid breakfasts and lunches served on any day of operation to children currently eligible for such meals. SFA staff shall maintain on file each month’s Claim for Reimbursement and all data used in the claims review process, by school. The above-noted CFR section also states that the SFA shall compare each school’s daily counts of meals serve against the product of the number of children in that school currently eligible for free, reduced price and paid lunches, respectively, times an attendance factor. Per Title 7, Code of Federal Regulations, Subtitle B, Chapter II, Subchapter A, Parts 210.8 and 220.11, SFA must submit monthly claims for reimbursement for meals and snacks served to eligible students within 60 days following the last day of the month covered by the claim. Condition The District did not have sufficient controls in place to ensure that monthly Claims for Reimbursement accurately reflected the numbers of meals served. There is no indication that a second person reviews data submissions. We noted discrepancies between the daily meal counts and the monthly Claims for Reimbursement. The system reports provided to the auditor for the 12 months selected for testing did not agree to the meal counts reported on the Claims for Reimbursement. Discrepancies included the misclassification of 1,665 lunch meals served. Misstatement of the number of lunch meals served resulted in overstatement revenue of $7,109. The District did not have sufficient controls in place to ensure that monthly Claims for Reimbursement accurately reflected the numbers of meals served. We noted discrepancies between the daily meal counts and the monthly Claims for Reimbursement. During the audit year, the District did not use a point-of-sale (POS) system to track meals served. There was no analytical review or edit check performed to determine reasonableness of meal counts, such as comparing the number of students enrolled to the number of meals served on a daily basis by site. Such analysis would allow staff to identify possible errors timely and in advance of filing a claim. Although not required, a POS system would automate these analyses, allowing for greater staff efficiencies and accuracy. Cause The condition identified appears to have materialized due to the District’s lack of established procedures to ensure compliance with the requirements under Title 7, Code of Federal Regulations, Subtitle B, Chapter II, Subchapter A, Parts 210.8 and 220.11. Effect The District has not complied with the requirements identified in Title 7, Code of Federal Regulations, Subtitle B, Chapter II, Subchapter A, Parts 210.8 and 220.11. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs associated with the identified condition. Context/Sampling The condition was identified through inquiry with District personnel and through review of available supporting documentation for the monthly Claims for Reimbursement. A nonstatistical sample of 12 months out of 12 months was selected for reporting testing. Condition The District did not have sufficient controls in place to ensure that monthly Claims for Reimbursement accurately reflected the numbers of meals served. There is no indication that a second person reviews data submissions. We noted discrepancies between the daily meal counts and the monthly Claims for Reimbursement. The system reports provided to the auditor for the 12 months selected for testing did not agree to the meal counts reported on the Claims for Reimbursement. Discrepancies included the misclassification of 1,665 lunch meals served. Misstatement of the number of lunch meals served resulted in overstatement revenue of $7,109. The District did not have sufficient controls in place to ensure that monthly Claims for Reimbursement accurately reflected the numbers of meals served. We noted discrepancies between the daily meal counts and the monthly Claims for Reimbursement. During the audit year, the District did not use a point-of-sale (POS) system to track meals served. There was no analytical review or edit check performed to determine reasonableness of meal counts, such as comparing the number of students enrolled to the number of meals served on a daily basis by site. Such analysis would allow staff to identify possible errors timely and in advance of filing a claim. Although not required, a POS system would automate these analyses, allowing for greater staff efficiencies and accuracy. Cause The condition identified appears to have materialized due to the District’s lack of established procedures to ensure compliance with the requirements under Title 7, Code of Federal Regulations, Subtitle B, Chapter II, Subchapter A, Parts 210.8 and 220.11. Effect The District has not complied with the requirements identified in Title 7, Code of Federal Regulations, Subtitle B, Chapter II, Subchapter A, Parts 210.8 and 220.11. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs associated with the identified condition. Context/Sampling The condition was identified through inquiry with District personnel and through review of available supporting documentation for the monthly Claims for Reimbursement. A nonstatistical sample of 12 months out of 12 months was selected for reporting testing.

Criteria or Specific Requirements: Per Title 7, Code of Federal Regulations, Subtitle B, Chapter II, Subchapter A, Parts 210.8 and 220.11, School Food Authorities (SFA) must establish internal controls which ensure the accuracy of meal counts prior to the submission of the monthly Claim for Reimbursement. Prior to submission of a monthly Claim for Reimbursement, each school food authority shall review the breakfast and lunch count data for each school under its jurisdiction to ensure the accuracy of the monthly Claim for Reimbursement. The objective of this review is to ensure that monthly claims include only the number of free, reduced price and paid breakfasts and lunches served on any day of operation to children currently eligible for such meals. SFA staff shall maintain on file each month’s Claim for Reimbursement and all data used in the claims review process, by school. The above-noted CFR section also states that the SFA shall compare each school’s daily counts of meals serve against the product of the number of children in that school currently eligible for free, reduced price and paid lunches, respectively, times an attendance factor. Per Title 7, Code of Federal Regulations, Subtitle B, Chapter II, Subchapter A, Parts 210.8 and 220.11, SFA must submit monthly claims for reimbursement for meals and snacks served to eligible students within 60 days following the last day of the month covered by the claim. Condition The District did not have sufficient controls in place to ensure that monthly Claims for Reimbursement accurately reflected the numbers of meals served. There is no indication that a second person reviews data submissions. We noted discrepancies between the daily meal counts and the monthly Claims for Reimbursement. The system reports provided to the auditor for the 12 months selected for testing did not agree to the meal counts reported on the Claims for Reimbursement. Discrepancies included the misclassification of 1,665 lunch meals served. Misstatement of the number of lunch meals served resulted in overstatement revenue of $7,109. The District did not have sufficient controls in place to ensure that monthly Claims for Reimbursement accurately reflected the numbers of meals served. We noted discrepancies between the daily meal counts and the monthly Claims for Reimbursement. During the audit year, the District did not use a point-of-sale (POS) system to track meals served. There was no analytical review or edit check performed to determine reasonableness of meal counts, such as comparing the number of students enrolled to the number of meals served on a daily basis by site. Such analysis would allow staff to identify possible errors timely and in advance of filing a claim. Although not required, a POS system would automate these analyses, allowing for greater staff efficiencies and accuracy. Cause The condition identified appears to have materialized due to the District’s lack of established procedures to ensure compliance with the requirements under Title 7, Code of Federal Regulations, Subtitle B, Chapter II, Subchapter A, Parts 210.8 and 220.11. Effect The District has not complied with the requirements identified in Title 7, Code of Federal Regulations, Subtitle B, Chapter II, Subchapter A, Parts 210.8 and 220.11. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs associated with the identified condition. Context/Sampling The condition was identified through inquiry with District personnel and through review of available supporting documentation for the monthly Claims for Reimbursement. A nonstatistical sample of 12 months out of 12 months was selected for reporting testing. Condition The District did not have sufficient controls in place to ensure that monthly Claims for Reimbursement accurately reflected the numbers of meals served. There is no indication that a second person reviews data submissions. We noted discrepancies between the daily meal counts and the monthly Claims for Reimbursement. The system reports provided to the auditor for the 12 months selected for testing did not agree to the meal counts reported on the Claims for Reimbursement. Discrepancies included the misclassification of 1,665 lunch meals served. Misstatement of the number of lunch meals served resulted in overstatement revenue of $7,109. The District did not have sufficient controls in place to ensure that monthly Claims for Reimbursement accurately reflected the numbers of meals served. We noted discrepancies between the daily meal counts and the monthly Claims for Reimbursement. During the audit year, the District did not use a point-of-sale (POS) system to track meals served. There was no analytical review or edit check performed to determine reasonableness of meal counts, such as comparing the number of students enrolled to the number of meals served on a daily basis by site. Such analysis would allow staff to identify possible errors timely and in advance of filing a claim. Although not required, a POS system would automate these analyses, allowing for greater staff efficiencies and accuracy. Cause The condition identified appears to have materialized due to the District’s lack of established procedures to ensure compliance with the requirements under Title 7, Code of Federal Regulations, Subtitle B, Chapter II, Subchapter A, Parts 210.8 and 220.11. Effect The District has not complied with the requirements identified in Title 7, Code of Federal Regulations, Subtitle B, Chapter II, Subchapter A, Parts 210.8 and 220.11. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs associated with the identified condition. Context/Sampling The condition was identified through inquiry with District personnel and through review of available supporting documentation for the monthly Claims for Reimbursement. A nonstatistical sample of 12 months out of 12 months was selected for reporting testing.

Criteria or Specific Requirements: Per Title 7, Code of Federal Regulations, Subtitle B, Chapter II, Subchapter A, Parts 210.8 and 220.11, School Food Authorities (SFA) must establish internal controls which ensure the accuracy of meal counts prior to the submission of the monthly Claim for Reimbursement. Prior to submission of a monthly Claim for Reimbursement, each school food authority shall review the breakfast and lunch count data for each school under its jurisdiction to ensure the accuracy of the monthly Claim for Reimbursement. The objective of this review is to ensure that monthly claims include only the number of free, reduced price and paid breakfasts and lunches served on any day of operation to children currently eligible for such meals. SFA staff shall maintain on file each month’s Claim for Reimbursement and all data used in the claims review process, by school. The above-noted CFR section also states that the SFA shall compare each school’s daily counts of meals serve against the product of the number of children in that school currently eligible for free, reduced price and paid lunches, respectively, times an attendance factor. Per Title 7, Code of Federal Regulations, Subtitle B, Chapter II, Subchapter A, Parts 210.8 and 220.11, SFA must submit monthly claims for reimbursement for meals and snacks served to eligible students within 60 days following the last day of the month covered by the claim. Condition The District did not have sufficient controls in place to ensure that monthly Claims for Reimbursement accurately reflected the numbers of meals served. There is no indication that a second person reviews data submissions. We noted discrepancies between the daily meal counts and the monthly Claims for Reimbursement. The system reports provided to the auditor for the 12 months selected for testing did not agree to the meal counts reported on the Claims for Reimbursement. Discrepancies included the misclassification of 1,665 lunch meals served. Misstatement of the number of lunch meals served resulted in overstatement revenue of $7,109. The District did not have sufficient controls in place to ensure that monthly Claims for Reimbursement accurately reflected the numbers of meals served. We noted discrepancies between the daily meal counts and the monthly Claims for Reimbursement. During the audit year, the District did not use a point-of-sale (POS) system to track meals served. There was no analytical review or edit check performed to determine reasonableness of meal counts, such as comparing the number of students enrolled to the number of meals served on a daily basis by site. Such analysis would allow staff to identify possible errors timely and in advance of filing a claim. Although not required, a POS system would automate these analyses, allowing for greater staff efficiencies and accuracy. Cause The condition identified appears to have materialized due to the District’s lack of established procedures to ensure compliance with the requirements under Title 7, Code of Federal Regulations, Subtitle B, Chapter II, Subchapter A, Parts 210.8 and 220.11. Effect The District has not complied with the requirements identified in Title 7, Code of Federal Regulations, Subtitle B, Chapter II, Subchapter A, Parts 210.8 and 220.11. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs associated with the identified condition. Context/Sampling The condition was identified through inquiry with District personnel and through review of available supporting documentation for the monthly Claims for Reimbursement. A nonstatistical sample of 12 months out of 12 months was selected for reporting testing. Condition The District did not have sufficient controls in place to ensure that monthly Claims for Reimbursement accurately reflected the numbers of meals served. There is no indication that a second person reviews data submissions. We noted discrepancies between the daily meal counts and the monthly Claims for Reimbursement. The system reports provided to the auditor for the 12 months selected for testing did not agree to the meal counts reported on the Claims for Reimbursement. Discrepancies included the misclassification of 1,665 lunch meals served. Misstatement of the number of lunch meals served resulted in overstatement revenue of $7,109. The District did not have sufficient controls in place to ensure that monthly Claims for Reimbursement accurately reflected the numbers of meals served. We noted discrepancies between the daily meal counts and the monthly Claims for Reimbursement. During the audit year, the District did not use a point-of-sale (POS) system to track meals served. There was no analytical review or edit check performed to determine reasonableness of meal counts, such as comparing the number of students enrolled to the number of meals served on a daily basis by site. Such analysis would allow staff to identify possible errors timely and in advance of filing a claim. Although not required, a POS system would automate these analyses, allowing for greater staff efficiencies and accuracy. Cause The condition identified appears to have materialized due to the District’s lack of established procedures to ensure compliance with the requirements under Title 7, Code of Federal Regulations, Subtitle B, Chapter II, Subchapter A, Parts 210.8 and 220.11. Effect The District has not complied with the requirements identified in Title 7, Code of Federal Regulations, Subtitle B, Chapter II, Subchapter A, Parts 210.8 and 220.11. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs associated with the identified condition. Context/Sampling The condition was identified through inquiry with District personnel and through review of available supporting documentation for the monthly Claims for Reimbursement. A nonstatistical sample of 12 months out of 12 months was selected for reporting testing.

Criteria or Specific Requirements: Per Title 7, Code of Federal Regulations, Subtitle B, Chapter II, Subchapter A, Parts 210.8 and 220.11, School Food Authorities (SFA) must establish internal controls which ensure the accuracy of meal counts prior to the submission of the monthly Claim for Reimbursement. Prior to submission of a monthly Claim for Reimbursement, each school food authority shall review the breakfast and lunch count data for each school under its jurisdiction to ensure the accuracy of the monthly Claim for Reimbursement. The objective of this review is to ensure that monthly claims include only the number of free, reduced price and paid breakfasts and lunches served on any day of operation to children currently eligible for such meals. SFA staff shall maintain on file each month’s Claim for Reimbursement and all data used in the claims review process, by school. The above-noted CFR section also states that the SFA shall compare each school’s daily counts of meals serve against the product of the number of children in that school currently eligible for free, reduced price and paid lunches, respectively, times an attendance factor. Per Title 7, Code of Federal Regulations, Subtitle B, Chapter II, Subchapter A, Parts 210.8 and 220.11, SFA must submit monthly claims for reimbursement for meals and snacks served to eligible students within 60 days following the last day of the month covered by the claim. Condition The District did not have sufficient controls in place to ensure that monthly Claims for Reimbursement accurately reflected the numbers of meals served. There is no indication that a second person reviews data submissions. We noted discrepancies between the daily meal counts and the monthly Claims for Reimbursement. The system reports provided to the auditor for the 12 months selected for testing did not agree to the meal counts reported on the Claims for Reimbursement. Discrepancies included the misclassification of 1,665 lunch meals served. Misstatement of the number of lunch meals served resulted in overstatement revenue of $7,109. The District did not have sufficient controls in place to ensure that monthly Claims for Reimbursement accurately reflected the numbers of meals served. We noted discrepancies between the daily meal counts and the monthly Claims for Reimbursement. During the audit year, the District did not use a point-of-sale (POS) system to track meals served. There was no analytical review or edit check performed to determine reasonableness of meal counts, such as comparing the number of students enrolled to the number of meals served on a daily basis by site. Such analysis would allow staff to identify possible errors timely and in advance of filing a claim. Although not required, a POS system would automate these analyses, allowing for greater staff efficiencies and accuracy. Cause The condition identified appears to have materialized due to the District’s lack of established procedures to ensure compliance with the requirements under Title 7, Code of Federal Regulations, Subtitle B, Chapter II, Subchapter A, Parts 210.8 and 220.11. Effect The District has not complied with the requirements identified in Title 7, Code of Federal Regulations, Subtitle B, Chapter II, Subchapter A, Parts 210.8 and 220.11. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs associated with the identified condition. Context/Sampling The condition was identified through inquiry with District personnel and through review of available supporting documentation for the monthly Claims for Reimbursement. A nonstatistical sample of 12 months out of 12 months was selected for reporting testing. Condition The District did not have sufficient controls in place to ensure that monthly Claims for Reimbursement accurately reflected the numbers of meals served. There is no indication that a second person reviews data submissions. We noted discrepancies between the daily meal counts and the monthly Claims for Reimbursement. The system reports provided to the auditor for the 12 months selected for testing did not agree to the meal counts reported on the Claims for Reimbursement. Discrepancies included the misclassification of 1,665 lunch meals served. Misstatement of the number of lunch meals served resulted in overstatement revenue of $7,109. The District did not have sufficient controls in place to ensure that monthly Claims for Reimbursement accurately reflected the numbers of meals served. We noted discrepancies between the daily meal counts and the monthly Claims for Reimbursement. During the audit year, the District did not use a point-of-sale (POS) system to track meals served. There was no analytical review or edit check performed to determine reasonableness of meal counts, such as comparing the number of students enrolled to the number of meals served on a daily basis by site. Such analysis would allow staff to identify possible errors timely and in advance of filing a claim. Although not required, a POS system would automate these analyses, allowing for greater staff efficiencies and accuracy. Cause The condition identified appears to have materialized due to the District’s lack of established procedures to ensure compliance with the requirements under Title 7, Code of Federal Regulations, Subtitle B, Chapter II, Subchapter A, Parts 210.8 and 220.11. Effect The District has not complied with the requirements identified in Title 7, Code of Federal Regulations, Subtitle B, Chapter II, Subchapter A, Parts 210.8 and 220.11. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs associated with the identified condition. Context/Sampling The condition was identified through inquiry with District personnel and through review of available supporting documentation for the monthly Claims for Reimbursement. A nonstatistical sample of 12 months out of 12 months was selected for reporting testing.

Criteria or Specific Requirements: Per Title 7, Code of Federal Regulations, Subtitle B, Chapter II, Subchapter A, Parts 210.8 and 220.11, School Food Authorities (SFA) must establish internal controls which ensure the accuracy of meal counts prior to the submission of the monthly Claim for Reimbursement. Prior to submission of a monthly Claim for Reimbursement, each school food authority shall review the breakfast and lunch count data for each school under its jurisdiction to ensure the accuracy of the monthly Claim for Reimbursement. The objective of this review is to ensure that monthly claims include only the number of free, reduced price and paid breakfasts and lunches served on any day of operation to children currently eligible for such meals. SFA staff shall maintain on file each month’s Claim for Reimbursement and all data used in the claims review process, by school. The above-noted CFR section also states that the SFA shall compare each school’s daily counts of meals serve against the product of the number of children in that school currently eligible for free, reduced price and paid lunches, respectively, times an attendance factor. Per Title 7, Code of Federal Regulations, Subtitle B, Chapter II, Subchapter A, Parts 210.8 and 220.11, SFA must submit monthly claims for reimbursement for meals and snacks served to eligible students within 60 days following the last day of the month covered by the claim. Condition The District did not have sufficient controls in place to ensure that monthly Claims for Reimbursement accurately reflected the numbers of meals served. There is no indication that a second person reviews data submissions. We noted discrepancies between the daily meal counts and the monthly Claims for Reimbursement. The system reports provided to the auditor for the 12 months selected for testing did not agree to the meal counts reported on the Claims for Reimbursement. Discrepancies included the misclassification of 1,665 lunch meals served. Misstatement of the number of lunch meals served resulted in overstatement revenue of $7,109. The District did not have sufficient controls in place to ensure that monthly Claims for Reimbursement accurately reflected the numbers of meals served. We noted discrepancies between the daily meal counts and the monthly Claims for Reimbursement. During the audit year, the District did not use a point-of-sale (POS) system to track meals served. There was no analytical review or edit check performed to determine reasonableness of meal counts, such as comparing the number of students enrolled to the number of meals served on a daily basis by site. Such analysis would allow staff to identify possible errors timely and in advance of filing a claim. Although not required, a POS system would automate these analyses, allowing for greater staff efficiencies and accuracy. Cause The condition identified appears to have materialized due to the District’s lack of established procedures to ensure compliance with the requirements under Title 7, Code of Federal Regulations, Subtitle B, Chapter II, Subchapter A, Parts 210.8 and 220.11. Effect The District has not complied with the requirements identified in Title 7, Code of Federal Regulations, Subtitle B, Chapter II, Subchapter A, Parts 210.8 and 220.11. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs associated with the identified condition. Context/Sampling The condition was identified through inquiry with District personnel and through review of available supporting documentation for the monthly Claims for Reimbursement. A nonstatistical sample of 12 months out of 12 months was selected for reporting testing. Condition The District did not have sufficient controls in place to ensure that monthly Claims for Reimbursement accurately reflected the numbers of meals served. There is no indication that a second person reviews data submissions. We noted discrepancies between the daily meal counts and the monthly Claims for Reimbursement. The system reports provided to the auditor for the 12 months selected for testing did not agree to the meal counts reported on the Claims for Reimbursement. Discrepancies included the misclassification of 1,665 lunch meals served. Misstatement of the number of lunch meals served resulted in overstatement revenue of $7,109. The District did not have sufficient controls in place to ensure that monthly Claims for Reimbursement accurately reflected the numbers of meals served. We noted discrepancies between the daily meal counts and the monthly Claims for Reimbursement. During the audit year, the District did not use a point-of-sale (POS) system to track meals served. There was no analytical review or edit check performed to determine reasonableness of meal counts, such as comparing the number of students enrolled to the number of meals served on a daily basis by site. Such analysis would allow staff to identify possible errors timely and in advance of filing a claim. Although not required, a POS system would automate these analyses, allowing for greater staff efficiencies and accuracy. Cause The condition identified appears to have materialized due to the District’s lack of established procedures to ensure compliance with the requirements under Title 7, Code of Federal Regulations, Subtitle B, Chapter II, Subchapter A, Parts 210.8 and 220.11. Effect The District has not complied with the requirements identified in Title 7, Code of Federal Regulations, Subtitle B, Chapter II, Subchapter A, Parts 210.8 and 220.11. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs associated with the identified condition. Context/Sampling The condition was identified through inquiry with District personnel and through review of available supporting documentation for the monthly Claims for Reimbursement. A nonstatistical sample of 12 months out of 12 months was selected for reporting testing.

Criteria or Specific Requirements: Per Title 7, Code of Federal Regulations, Subtitle B, Chapter II, Subchapter A, Parts 210.8 and 220.11, School Food Authorities (SFA) must establish internal controls which ensure the accuracy of meal counts prior to the submission of the monthly Claim for Reimbursement. Prior to submission of a monthly Claim for Reimbursement, each school food authority shall review the breakfast and lunch count data for each school under its jurisdiction to ensure the accuracy of the monthly Claim for Reimbursement. The objective of this review is to ensure that monthly claims include only the number of free, reduced price and paid breakfasts and lunches served on any day of operation to children currently eligible for such meals. SFA staff shall maintain on file each month’s Claim for Reimbursement and all data used in the claims review process, by school. The above-noted CFR section also states that the SFA shall compare each school’s daily counts of meals serve against the product of the number of children in that school currently eligible for free, reduced price and paid lunches, respectively, times an attendance factor. Per Title 7, Code of Federal Regulations, Subtitle B, Chapter II, Subchapter A, Parts 210.8 and 220.11, SFA must submit monthly claims for reimbursement for meals and snacks served to eligible students within 60 days following the last day of the month covered by the claim. Condition The District did not have sufficient controls in place to ensure that monthly Claims for Reimbursement accurately reflected the numbers of meals served. There is no indication that a second person reviews data submissions. We noted discrepancies between the daily meal counts and the monthly Claims for Reimbursement. The system reports provided to the auditor for the 12 months selected for testing did not agree to the meal counts reported on the Claims for Reimbursement. Discrepancies included the misclassification of 1,665 lunch meals served. Misstatement of the number of lunch meals served resulted in overstatement revenue of $7,109. The District did not have sufficient controls in place to ensure that monthly Claims for Reimbursement accurately reflected the numbers of meals served. We noted discrepancies between the daily meal counts and the monthly Claims for Reimbursement. During the audit year, the District did not use a point-of-sale (POS) system to track meals served. There was no analytical review or edit check performed to determine reasonableness of meal counts, such as comparing the number of students enrolled to the number of meals served on a daily basis by site. Such analysis would allow staff to identify possible errors timely and in advance of filing a claim. Although not required, a POS system would automate these analyses, allowing for greater staff efficiencies and accuracy. Cause The condition identified appears to have materialized due to the District’s lack of established procedures to ensure compliance with the requirements under Title 7, Code of Federal Regulations, Subtitle B, Chapter II, Subchapter A, Parts 210.8 and 220.11. Effect The District has not complied with the requirements identified in Title 7, Code of Federal Regulations, Subtitle B, Chapter II, Subchapter A, Parts 210.8 and 220.11. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs associated with the identified condition. Context/Sampling The condition was identified through inquiry with District personnel and through review of available supporting documentation for the monthly Claims for Reimbursement. A nonstatistical sample of 12 months out of 12 months was selected for reporting testing. Condition The District did not have sufficient controls in place to ensure that monthly Claims for Reimbursement accurately reflected the numbers of meals served. There is no indication that a second person reviews data submissions. We noted discrepancies between the daily meal counts and the monthly Claims for Reimbursement. The system reports provided to the auditor for the 12 months selected for testing did not agree to the meal counts reported on the Claims for Reimbursement. Discrepancies included the misclassification of 1,665 lunch meals served. Misstatement of the number of lunch meals served resulted in overstatement revenue of $7,109. The District did not have sufficient controls in place to ensure that monthly Claims for Reimbursement accurately reflected the numbers of meals served. We noted discrepancies between the daily meal counts and the monthly Claims for Reimbursement. During the audit year, the District did not use a point-of-sale (POS) system to track meals served. There was no analytical review or edit check performed to determine reasonableness of meal counts, such as comparing the number of students enrolled to the number of meals served on a daily basis by site. Such analysis would allow staff to identify possible errors timely and in advance of filing a claim. Although not required, a POS system would automate these analyses, allowing for greater staff efficiencies and accuracy. Cause The condition identified appears to have materialized due to the District’s lack of established procedures to ensure compliance with the requirements under Title 7, Code of Federal Regulations, Subtitle B, Chapter II, Subchapter A, Parts 210.8 and 220.11. Effect The District has not complied with the requirements identified in Title 7, Code of Federal Regulations, Subtitle B, Chapter II, Subchapter A, Parts 210.8 and 220.11. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs associated with the identified condition. Context/Sampling The condition was identified through inquiry with District personnel and through review of available supporting documentation for the monthly Claims for Reimbursement. A nonstatistical sample of 12 months out of 12 months was selected for reporting testing.