Audit 361982

FY End
2022-06-30
Total Expended
$1.16M
Findings
2
Programs
1

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
571106 2022-001 - Yes M
1147548 2022-001 - Yes M

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
21.019 Coronavirus Relief Fund $1.16M Yes 1

Contacts

Name Title Type
XALJCH99MDC7 Martina Jackson Green Auditee
7033444729 Vivian Patrice Jenkins Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Basis of Presentation Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following, as applicable the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Negative amounts shown on the Schedule represent adjustments or credits made in the normal course of business to amounts reported as expenditures in prior years. Pass-through entity identifying numbers are presented where available. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Human Services Alliance of Greater Prince William has not elected to use the 10-percent de minimis cost rate as allowed under Uniform Guidance. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (“the Schedule") includes the federal award activity of the Human Services Alliance of Greater Prince William under programs of the federal government for the year ended December 31, 2023. The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the Human Services Alliance of Greater Prince William, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net assets or cash flows of the Organization.
Title: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following, as applicable the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Negative amounts shown on the Schedule represent adjustments or credits made in the normal course of business to amounts reported as expenditures in prior years. Pass-through entity identifying numbers are presented where available. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Human Services Alliance of Greater Prince William has not elected to use the 10-percent de minimis cost rate as allowed under Uniform Guidance. Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the cost principles contained in Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are now allowable or limited as to reimbursement.
Title: Indirect Cost Rate Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following, as applicable the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Negative amounts shown on the Schedule represent adjustments or credits made in the normal course of business to amounts reported as expenditures in prior years. Pass-through entity identifying numbers are presented where available. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Human Services Alliance of Greater Prince William has not elected to use the 10-percent de minimis cost rate as allowed under Uniform Guidance. The Human Services Alliance of Greater Prince William has not elected to use the 10-percent de minimis cost rate as allowed under Uniform Guidance.

Finding Details

During our audit, for 10 or 10 sub-recipients we selected for testing, we found that management did not document or retain supporting documents to support its risk assessment conclusions used to determine the extent of subrecipient monitoring performed during the year. In addition, management did not retain support for its monitoring activities of subrecipients.
During our audit, for 10 or 10 sub-recipients we selected for testing, we found that management did not document or retain supporting documents to support its risk assessment conclusions used to determine the extent of subrecipient monitoring performed during the year. In addition, management did not retain support for its monitoring activities of subrecipients.