Audit 361801

FY End
2023-06-30
Total Expended
$5.75M
Findings
4
Programs
1

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
570870 2023-001 Significant Deficiency - B
570871 2023-002 Significant Deficiency Yes M
1147312 2023-001 Significant Deficiency - B
1147313 2023-002 Significant Deficiency Yes M

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
21.019 Coronavirus Relief Fund $5.75M Yes 2

Contacts

Name Title Type
XALJCH99MDC7 Martina Jackson Green Auditee
7033444729 Vivian Patrice Jenkins Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Basis of Presentation Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the cost principles contained in Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are now allowable or limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Human Services Alliance of Greater Prince William has not elected to use the 10-percent de minimis cost rate as allowed under Uniform Guidance. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (“the Schedule") includes the federal award activity of the Human Services Alliance of Greater Prince William under programs of the federal government for the year ended December 31, 2023. The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the Human Services Alliance of Greater Prince William, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net assets or cash flows of the Organization.
Title: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the cost principles contained in Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are now allowable or limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Human Services Alliance of Greater Prince William has not elected to use the 10-percent de minimis cost rate as allowed under Uniform Guidance. Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the cost principles contained in Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are now allowable or limited as to reimbursement.
Title: Indirect Cost Rate Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the cost principles contained in Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are now allowable or limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Human Services Alliance of Greater Prince William has not elected to use the 10-percent de minimis cost rate as allowed under Uniform Guidance. The Human Services Alliance of Greater Prince William has not elected to use the 10-percent de minimis cost rate as allowed under Uniform Guidance.

Finding Details

During our audit for the year ended June 30, 2023, we found that management did not retain documentation to support its allocation of wages, salaries, f ringe benef its and other indirect costs.
During our audit, we found that management did not document its subrecipient monitoring policies and procedures, nor did it retain documentation supporting the results of its monitoring and periodic risk assessments.
During our audit for the year ended June 30, 2023, we found that management did not retain documentation to support its allocation of wages, salaries, f ringe benef its and other indirect costs.
During our audit, we found that management did not document its subrecipient monitoring policies and procedures, nor did it retain documentation supporting the results of its monitoring and periodic risk assessments.