Audit 361160

FY End
2024-09-30
Total Expended
$17.80M
Findings
32
Programs
15
Year: 2024 Accepted: 2025-07-01

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
569908 2024-001 Material Weakness - P
569909 2024-001 Material Weakness - P
569910 2024-001 Material Weakness - P
569911 2024-001 Material Weakness - P
569912 2024-001 Material Weakness - P
569913 2024-001 Material Weakness - P
569914 2024-001 Material Weakness - P
569915 2024-001 Material Weakness - P
569916 2024-001 Material Weakness - P
569917 2024-001 Material Weakness - P
569918 2024-001 Material Weakness - P
569919 2024-005 Significant Deficiency Yes M
569920 2024-005 Significant Deficiency Yes M
569921 2024-005 Significant Deficiency Yes M
569922 2024-005 Significant Deficiency Yes M
569923 2024-005 Significant Deficiency Yes M
1146350 2024-001 Material Weakness - P
1146351 2024-001 Material Weakness - P
1146352 2024-001 Material Weakness - P
1146353 2024-001 Material Weakness - P
1146354 2024-001 Material Weakness - P
1146355 2024-001 Material Weakness - P
1146356 2024-001 Material Weakness - P
1146357 2024-001 Material Weakness - P
1146358 2024-001 Material Weakness - P
1146359 2024-001 Material Weakness - P
1146360 2024-001 Material Weakness - P
1146361 2024-005 Significant Deficiency Yes M
1146362 2024-005 Significant Deficiency Yes M
1146363 2024-005 Significant Deficiency Yes M
1146364 2024-005 Significant Deficiency Yes M
1146365 2024-005 Significant Deficiency Yes M

Contacts

Name Title Type
MTCKBT6GUAN5 Marci Davis Auditee
5105357170 Josh Wilson Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: AMOUNTS PROVIDED TO SUBRECIPIENTS Accounting Policies: 1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal and state awards (the Schedule) includes the federal and state award activity of Spanish Speaking Unity Council of Alameda County, Inc. (the Unity Council) under programs of the federal government and State of California for the year ended September 30, 2024. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) and the California Department of Education. Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the Unity Council, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net assets, or cash flows of the Unity Council. 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or limited as to reimbursement. Pass¬ through entity identifying numbers are presented where available and applicable. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Unity Council has elected to not use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate for Federal awards. The Unity Council applies indirect costs in accordance with the specific terms for its specific award agreements. The Unity Council provided grant funds to the following entity as subrecipient of the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds assistance listing # 21.024 during the year ended September 30, 2024. Subrecipient CFDA Number Amount The Alliance for Community Wellness DBA La Familia, Street Level Health Project, and Trybe Inc. 21.027 $ 373,128 Total $ 373,128

Finding Details

Finding number: 2024-001 Condition: During our audit, we noted that, due to turnover within the finance department, the Organization was not able to implement adequate internal controls over the consolidated financial statement closing and reporting process to allow for timely preparation and review of year-end reconciliations and schedules which resulted in numerous post-closing adjustments, delays in obtaining schedules and supporting documents and numerous revisions to schedule of federal expenditures. Criteria: Management and those charged with governance are responsible for the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of consolidated financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error. Cause: Turnover of key personnel during 2024, and general lack of implementation of U.S. GAAP, did not allow for consistent and effective implementation of existing internal controls over financial reporting. Effect: Certain internal controls were not consistently, or effectively, implemented, and numerous post-closing adjustments were required to correct identified misstatements during the audit. Recommendation: We recommend the Organization add personnel to the accounting/finance team and continue improving and training the accounting positions for the purpose of effective design and implementation of internal controls over financial reporting. Further, we recommend management evaluate the design of internal controls over the financial closing and reporting process to ensure adequate closing procedures, including implementation of a detailed monthly close checklist to include review of key account reconciliations, journal entries, and non-routine transactions at the appropriate level in a timely manner. We also recommend the Organization create a robust year-end reporting checklist that provides for proper recording of transactions in accordance with U.S. GAAP and includes cut-off procedures to ensure transactions are captured in the correct period. The implementation of these checklists will minimize the number of misstatements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management concurs and has provided a Corrective Action Plan which is included at the end of this report
Finding number: 2024-001 Condition: During our audit, we noted that, due to turnover within the finance department, the Organization was not able to implement adequate internal controls over the consolidated financial statement closing and reporting process to allow for timely preparation and review of year-end reconciliations and schedules which resulted in numerous post-closing adjustments, delays in obtaining schedules and supporting documents and numerous revisions to schedule of federal expenditures. Criteria: Management and those charged with governance are responsible for the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of consolidated financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error. Cause: Turnover of key personnel during 2024, and general lack of implementation of U.S. GAAP, did not allow for consistent and effective implementation of existing internal controls over financial reporting. Effect: Certain internal controls were not consistently, or effectively, implemented, and numerous post-closing adjustments were required to correct identified misstatements during the audit. Recommendation: We recommend the Organization add personnel to the accounting/finance team and continue improving and training the accounting positions for the purpose of effective design and implementation of internal controls over financial reporting. Further, we recommend management evaluate the design of internal controls over the financial closing and reporting process to ensure adequate closing procedures, including implementation of a detailed monthly close checklist to include review of key account reconciliations, journal entries, and non-routine transactions at the appropriate level in a timely manner. We also recommend the Organization create a robust year-end reporting checklist that provides for proper recording of transactions in accordance with U.S. GAAP and includes cut-off procedures to ensure transactions are captured in the correct period. The implementation of these checklists will minimize the number of misstatements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management concurs and has provided a Corrective Action Plan which is included at the end of this report
Finding number: 2024-001 Condition: During our audit, we noted that, due to turnover within the finance department, the Organization was not able to implement adequate internal controls over the consolidated financial statement closing and reporting process to allow for timely preparation and review of year-end reconciliations and schedules which resulted in numerous post-closing adjustments, delays in obtaining schedules and supporting documents and numerous revisions to schedule of federal expenditures. Criteria: Management and those charged with governance are responsible for the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of consolidated financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error. Cause: Turnover of key personnel during 2024, and general lack of implementation of U.S. GAAP, did not allow for consistent and effective implementation of existing internal controls over financial reporting. Effect: Certain internal controls were not consistently, or effectively, implemented, and numerous post-closing adjustments were required to correct identified misstatements during the audit. Recommendation: We recommend the Organization add personnel to the accounting/finance team and continue improving and training the accounting positions for the purpose of effective design and implementation of internal controls over financial reporting. Further, we recommend management evaluate the design of internal controls over the financial closing and reporting process to ensure adequate closing procedures, including implementation of a detailed monthly close checklist to include review of key account reconciliations, journal entries, and non-routine transactions at the appropriate level in a timely manner. We also recommend the Organization create a robust year-end reporting checklist that provides for proper recording of transactions in accordance with U.S. GAAP and includes cut-off procedures to ensure transactions are captured in the correct period. The implementation of these checklists will minimize the number of misstatements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management concurs and has provided a Corrective Action Plan which is included at the end of this report
Finding number: 2024-001 Condition: During our audit, we noted that, due to turnover within the finance department, the Organization was not able to implement adequate internal controls over the consolidated financial statement closing and reporting process to allow for timely preparation and review of year-end reconciliations and schedules which resulted in numerous post-closing adjustments, delays in obtaining schedules and supporting documents and numerous revisions to schedule of federal expenditures. Criteria: Management and those charged with governance are responsible for the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of consolidated financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error. Cause: Turnover of key personnel during 2024, and general lack of implementation of U.S. GAAP, did not allow for consistent and effective implementation of existing internal controls over financial reporting. Effect: Certain internal controls were not consistently, or effectively, implemented, and numerous post-closing adjustments were required to correct identified misstatements during the audit. Recommendation: We recommend the Organization add personnel to the accounting/finance team and continue improving and training the accounting positions for the purpose of effective design and implementation of internal controls over financial reporting. Further, we recommend management evaluate the design of internal controls over the financial closing and reporting process to ensure adequate closing procedures, including implementation of a detailed monthly close checklist to include review of key account reconciliations, journal entries, and non-routine transactions at the appropriate level in a timely manner. We also recommend the Organization create a robust year-end reporting checklist that provides for proper recording of transactions in accordance with U.S. GAAP and includes cut-off procedures to ensure transactions are captured in the correct period. The implementation of these checklists will minimize the number of misstatements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management concurs and has provided a Corrective Action Plan which is included at the end of this report
Finding number: 2024-001 Condition: During our audit, we noted that, due to turnover within the finance department, the Organization was not able to implement adequate internal controls over the consolidated financial statement closing and reporting process to allow for timely preparation and review of year-end reconciliations and schedules which resulted in numerous post-closing adjustments, delays in obtaining schedules and supporting documents and numerous revisions to schedule of federal expenditures. Criteria: Management and those charged with governance are responsible for the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of consolidated financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error. Cause: Turnover of key personnel during 2024, and general lack of implementation of U.S. GAAP, did not allow for consistent and effective implementation of existing internal controls over financial reporting. Effect: Certain internal controls were not consistently, or effectively, implemented, and numerous post-closing adjustments were required to correct identified misstatements during the audit. Recommendation: We recommend the Organization add personnel to the accounting/finance team and continue improving and training the accounting positions for the purpose of effective design and implementation of internal controls over financial reporting. Further, we recommend management evaluate the design of internal controls over the financial closing and reporting process to ensure adequate closing procedures, including implementation of a detailed monthly close checklist to include review of key account reconciliations, journal entries, and non-routine transactions at the appropriate level in a timely manner. We also recommend the Organization create a robust year-end reporting checklist that provides for proper recording of transactions in accordance with U.S. GAAP and includes cut-off procedures to ensure transactions are captured in the correct period. The implementation of these checklists will minimize the number of misstatements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management concurs and has provided a Corrective Action Plan which is included at the end of this report
Finding number: 2024-001 Condition: During our audit, we noted that, due to turnover within the finance department, the Organization was not able to implement adequate internal controls over the consolidated financial statement closing and reporting process to allow for timely preparation and review of year-end reconciliations and schedules which resulted in numerous post-closing adjustments, delays in obtaining schedules and supporting documents and numerous revisions to schedule of federal expenditures. Criteria: Management and those charged with governance are responsible for the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of consolidated financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error. Cause: Turnover of key personnel during 2024, and general lack of implementation of U.S. GAAP, did not allow for consistent and effective implementation of existing internal controls over financial reporting. Effect: Certain internal controls were not consistently, or effectively, implemented, and numerous post-closing adjustments were required to correct identified misstatements during the audit. Recommendation: We recommend the Organization add personnel to the accounting/finance team and continue improving and training the accounting positions for the purpose of effective design and implementation of internal controls over financial reporting. Further, we recommend management evaluate the design of internal controls over the financial closing and reporting process to ensure adequate closing procedures, including implementation of a detailed monthly close checklist to include review of key account reconciliations, journal entries, and non-routine transactions at the appropriate level in a timely manner. We also recommend the Organization create a robust year-end reporting checklist that provides for proper recording of transactions in accordance with U.S. GAAP and includes cut-off procedures to ensure transactions are captured in the correct period. The implementation of these checklists will minimize the number of misstatements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management concurs and has provided a Corrective Action Plan which is included at the end of this report
Finding number: 2024-001 Condition: During our audit, we noted that, due to turnover within the finance department, the Organization was not able to implement adequate internal controls over the consolidated financial statement closing and reporting process to allow for timely preparation and review of year-end reconciliations and schedules which resulted in numerous post-closing adjustments, delays in obtaining schedules and supporting documents and numerous revisions to schedule of federal expenditures. Criteria: Management and those charged with governance are responsible for the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of consolidated financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error. Cause: Turnover of key personnel during 2024, and general lack of implementation of U.S. GAAP, did not allow for consistent and effective implementation of existing internal controls over financial reporting. Effect: Certain internal controls were not consistently, or effectively, implemented, and numerous post-closing adjustments were required to correct identified misstatements during the audit. Recommendation: We recommend the Organization add personnel to the accounting/finance team and continue improving and training the accounting positions for the purpose of effective design and implementation of internal controls over financial reporting. Further, we recommend management evaluate the design of internal controls over the financial closing and reporting process to ensure adequate closing procedures, including implementation of a detailed monthly close checklist to include review of key account reconciliations, journal entries, and non-routine transactions at the appropriate level in a timely manner. We also recommend the Organization create a robust year-end reporting checklist that provides for proper recording of transactions in accordance with U.S. GAAP and includes cut-off procedures to ensure transactions are captured in the correct period. The implementation of these checklists will minimize the number of misstatements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management concurs and has provided a Corrective Action Plan which is included at the end of this report
Finding number: 2024-001 Condition: During our audit, we noted that, due to turnover within the finance department, the Organization was not able to implement adequate internal controls over the consolidated financial statement closing and reporting process to allow for timely preparation and review of year-end reconciliations and schedules which resulted in numerous post-closing adjustments, delays in obtaining schedules and supporting documents and numerous revisions to schedule of federal expenditures. Criteria: Management and those charged with governance are responsible for the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of consolidated financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error. Cause: Turnover of key personnel during 2024, and general lack of implementation of U.S. GAAP, did not allow for consistent and effective implementation of existing internal controls over financial reporting. Effect: Certain internal controls were not consistently, or effectively, implemented, and numerous post-closing adjustments were required to correct identified misstatements during the audit. Recommendation: We recommend the Organization add personnel to the accounting/finance team and continue improving and training the accounting positions for the purpose of effective design and implementation of internal controls over financial reporting. Further, we recommend management evaluate the design of internal controls over the financial closing and reporting process to ensure adequate closing procedures, including implementation of a detailed monthly close checklist to include review of key account reconciliations, journal entries, and non-routine transactions at the appropriate level in a timely manner. We also recommend the Organization create a robust year-end reporting checklist that provides for proper recording of transactions in accordance with U.S. GAAP and includes cut-off procedures to ensure transactions are captured in the correct period. The implementation of these checklists will minimize the number of misstatements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management concurs and has provided a Corrective Action Plan which is included at the end of this report
Finding number: 2024-001 Condition: During our audit, we noted that, due to turnover within the finance department, the Organization was not able to implement adequate internal controls over the consolidated financial statement closing and reporting process to allow for timely preparation and review of year-end reconciliations and schedules which resulted in numerous post-closing adjustments, delays in obtaining schedules and supporting documents and numerous revisions to schedule of federal expenditures. Criteria: Management and those charged with governance are responsible for the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of consolidated financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error. Cause: Turnover of key personnel during 2024, and general lack of implementation of U.S. GAAP, did not allow for consistent and effective implementation of existing internal controls over financial reporting. Effect: Certain internal controls were not consistently, or effectively, implemented, and numerous post-closing adjustments were required to correct identified misstatements during the audit. Recommendation: We recommend the Organization add personnel to the accounting/finance team and continue improving and training the accounting positions for the purpose of effective design and implementation of internal controls over financial reporting. Further, we recommend management evaluate the design of internal controls over the financial closing and reporting process to ensure adequate closing procedures, including implementation of a detailed monthly close checklist to include review of key account reconciliations, journal entries, and non-routine transactions at the appropriate level in a timely manner. We also recommend the Organization create a robust year-end reporting checklist that provides for proper recording of transactions in accordance with U.S. GAAP and includes cut-off procedures to ensure transactions are captured in the correct period. The implementation of these checklists will minimize the number of misstatements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management concurs and has provided a Corrective Action Plan which is included at the end of this report
Finding number: 2024-001 Condition: During our audit, we noted that, due to turnover within the finance department, the Organization was not able to implement adequate internal controls over the consolidated financial statement closing and reporting process to allow for timely preparation and review of year-end reconciliations and schedules which resulted in numerous post-closing adjustments, delays in obtaining schedules and supporting documents and numerous revisions to schedule of federal expenditures. Criteria: Management and those charged with governance are responsible for the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of consolidated financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error. Cause: Turnover of key personnel during 2024, and general lack of implementation of U.S. GAAP, did not allow for consistent and effective implementation of existing internal controls over financial reporting. Effect: Certain internal controls were not consistently, or effectively, implemented, and numerous post-closing adjustments were required to correct identified misstatements during the audit. Recommendation: We recommend the Organization add personnel to the accounting/finance team and continue improving and training the accounting positions for the purpose of effective design and implementation of internal controls over financial reporting. Further, we recommend management evaluate the design of internal controls over the financial closing and reporting process to ensure adequate closing procedures, including implementation of a detailed monthly close checklist to include review of key account reconciliations, journal entries, and non-routine transactions at the appropriate level in a timely manner. We also recommend the Organization create a robust year-end reporting checklist that provides for proper recording of transactions in accordance with U.S. GAAP and includes cut-off procedures to ensure transactions are captured in the correct period. The implementation of these checklists will minimize the number of misstatements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management concurs and has provided a Corrective Action Plan which is included at the end of this report
Finding number: 2024-001 Condition: During our audit, we noted that, due to turnover within the finance department, the Organization was not able to implement adequate internal controls over the consolidated financial statement closing and reporting process to allow for timely preparation and review of year-end reconciliations and schedules which resulted in numerous post-closing adjustments, delays in obtaining schedules and supporting documents and numerous revisions to schedule of federal expenditures. Criteria: Management and those charged with governance are responsible for the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of consolidated financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error. Cause: Turnover of key personnel during 2024, and general lack of implementation of U.S. GAAP, did not allow for consistent and effective implementation of existing internal controls over financial reporting. Effect: Certain internal controls were not consistently, or effectively, implemented, and numerous post-closing adjustments were required to correct identified misstatements during the audit. Recommendation: We recommend the Organization add personnel to the accounting/finance team and continue improving and training the accounting positions for the purpose of effective design and implementation of internal controls over financial reporting. Further, we recommend management evaluate the design of internal controls over the financial closing and reporting process to ensure adequate closing procedures, including implementation of a detailed monthly close checklist to include review of key account reconciliations, journal entries, and non-routine transactions at the appropriate level in a timely manner. We also recommend the Organization create a robust year-end reporting checklist that provides for proper recording of transactions in accordance with U.S. GAAP and includes cut-off procedures to ensure transactions are captured in the correct period. The implementation of these checklists will minimize the number of misstatements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management concurs and has provided a Corrective Action Plan which is included at the end of this report
Finding number: 2024-005 Significant Deficiency – Lack of Internal Control Over Compliance with Subrecipient Monitoring Policy Assistance Listing Number #21.027 Criteria: Pursuant to CFR section 200.332(b), pass-through entities must evaluate each subrecipient's risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring. Condition: The Unity Council did not perform a risk assessment of subrecipients. This is a repeat finding. Cause: The Organization does not have a formally documented policy for performing a risk assessment over subrecipients. Effect or potential effect: A risk assessment for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring was not performed. Recommendation: Management should develop a risk assessment policy to evaluate the risk profile of each subrecipient. Factors included during the evaluation can include the subrecipient's prior experience with the same or similar subawards, results of previous audits, whether the subrecipient has new personnel or new or substantially changed systems, and the extent and results of federal awarding agency monitoring. View of responsible officials: Management is in agreement with the finding and is in the process of developing and documenting a more robust risk assessment process.
Finding number: 2024-005 Significant Deficiency – Lack of Internal Control Over Compliance with Subrecipient Monitoring Policy Assistance Listing Number #21.027 Criteria: Pursuant to CFR section 200.332(b), pass-through entities must evaluate each subrecipient's risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring. Condition: The Unity Council did not perform a risk assessment of subrecipients. This is a repeat finding. Cause: The Organization does not have a formally documented policy for performing a risk assessment over subrecipients. Effect or potential effect: A risk assessment for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring was not performed. Recommendation: Management should develop a risk assessment policy to evaluate the risk profile of each subrecipient. Factors included during the evaluation can include the subrecipient's prior experience with the same or similar subawards, results of previous audits, whether the subrecipient has new personnel or new or substantially changed systems, and the extent and results of federal awarding agency monitoring. View of responsible officials: Management is in agreement with the finding and is in the process of developing and documenting a more robust risk assessment process.
Finding number: 2024-005 Significant Deficiency – Lack of Internal Control Over Compliance with Subrecipient Monitoring Policy Assistance Listing Number #21.027 Criteria: Pursuant to CFR section 200.332(b), pass-through entities must evaluate each subrecipient's risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring. Condition: The Unity Council did not perform a risk assessment of subrecipients. This is a repeat finding. Cause: The Organization does not have a formally documented policy for performing a risk assessment over subrecipients. Effect or potential effect: A risk assessment for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring was not performed. Recommendation: Management should develop a risk assessment policy to evaluate the risk profile of each subrecipient. Factors included during the evaluation can include the subrecipient's prior experience with the same or similar subawards, results of previous audits, whether the subrecipient has new personnel or new or substantially changed systems, and the extent and results of federal awarding agency monitoring. View of responsible officials: Management is in agreement with the finding and is in the process of developing and documenting a more robust risk assessment process.
Finding number: 2024-005 Significant Deficiency – Lack of Internal Control Over Compliance with Subrecipient Monitoring Policy Assistance Listing Number #21.027 Criteria: Pursuant to CFR section 200.332(b), pass-through entities must evaluate each subrecipient's risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring. Condition: The Unity Council did not perform a risk assessment of subrecipients. This is a repeat finding. Cause: The Organization does not have a formally documented policy for performing a risk assessment over subrecipients. Effect or potential effect: A risk assessment for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring was not performed. Recommendation: Management should develop a risk assessment policy to evaluate the risk profile of each subrecipient. Factors included during the evaluation can include the subrecipient's prior experience with the same or similar subawards, results of previous audits, whether the subrecipient has new personnel or new or substantially changed systems, and the extent and results of federal awarding agency monitoring. View of responsible officials: Management is in agreement with the finding and is in the process of developing and documenting a more robust risk assessment process.
Finding number: 2024-005 Significant Deficiency – Lack of Internal Control Over Compliance with Subrecipient Monitoring Policy Assistance Listing Number #21.027 Criteria: Pursuant to CFR section 200.332(b), pass-through entities must evaluate each subrecipient's risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring. Condition: The Unity Council did not perform a risk assessment of subrecipients. This is a repeat finding. Cause: The Organization does not have a formally documented policy for performing a risk assessment over subrecipients. Effect or potential effect: A risk assessment for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring was not performed. Recommendation: Management should develop a risk assessment policy to evaluate the risk profile of each subrecipient. Factors included during the evaluation can include the subrecipient's prior experience with the same or similar subawards, results of previous audits, whether the subrecipient has new personnel or new or substantially changed systems, and the extent and results of federal awarding agency monitoring. View of responsible officials: Management is in agreement with the finding and is in the process of developing and documenting a more robust risk assessment process.
Finding number: 2024-001 Condition: During our audit, we noted that, due to turnover within the finance department, the Organization was not able to implement adequate internal controls over the consolidated financial statement closing and reporting process to allow for timely preparation and review of year-end reconciliations and schedules which resulted in numerous post-closing adjustments, delays in obtaining schedules and supporting documents and numerous revisions to schedule of federal expenditures. Criteria: Management and those charged with governance are responsible for the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of consolidated financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error. Cause: Turnover of key personnel during 2024, and general lack of implementation of U.S. GAAP, did not allow for consistent and effective implementation of existing internal controls over financial reporting. Effect: Certain internal controls were not consistently, or effectively, implemented, and numerous post-closing adjustments were required to correct identified misstatements during the audit. Recommendation: We recommend the Organization add personnel to the accounting/finance team and continue improving and training the accounting positions for the purpose of effective design and implementation of internal controls over financial reporting. Further, we recommend management evaluate the design of internal controls over the financial closing and reporting process to ensure adequate closing procedures, including implementation of a detailed monthly close checklist to include review of key account reconciliations, journal entries, and non-routine transactions at the appropriate level in a timely manner. We also recommend the Organization create a robust year-end reporting checklist that provides for proper recording of transactions in accordance with U.S. GAAP and includes cut-off procedures to ensure transactions are captured in the correct period. The implementation of these checklists will minimize the number of misstatements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management concurs and has provided a Corrective Action Plan which is included at the end of this report
Finding number: 2024-001 Condition: During our audit, we noted that, due to turnover within the finance department, the Organization was not able to implement adequate internal controls over the consolidated financial statement closing and reporting process to allow for timely preparation and review of year-end reconciliations and schedules which resulted in numerous post-closing adjustments, delays in obtaining schedules and supporting documents and numerous revisions to schedule of federal expenditures. Criteria: Management and those charged with governance are responsible for the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of consolidated financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error. Cause: Turnover of key personnel during 2024, and general lack of implementation of U.S. GAAP, did not allow for consistent and effective implementation of existing internal controls over financial reporting. Effect: Certain internal controls were not consistently, or effectively, implemented, and numerous post-closing adjustments were required to correct identified misstatements during the audit. Recommendation: We recommend the Organization add personnel to the accounting/finance team and continue improving and training the accounting positions for the purpose of effective design and implementation of internal controls over financial reporting. Further, we recommend management evaluate the design of internal controls over the financial closing and reporting process to ensure adequate closing procedures, including implementation of a detailed monthly close checklist to include review of key account reconciliations, journal entries, and non-routine transactions at the appropriate level in a timely manner. We also recommend the Organization create a robust year-end reporting checklist that provides for proper recording of transactions in accordance with U.S. GAAP and includes cut-off procedures to ensure transactions are captured in the correct period. The implementation of these checklists will minimize the number of misstatements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management concurs and has provided a Corrective Action Plan which is included at the end of this report
Finding number: 2024-001 Condition: During our audit, we noted that, due to turnover within the finance department, the Organization was not able to implement adequate internal controls over the consolidated financial statement closing and reporting process to allow for timely preparation and review of year-end reconciliations and schedules which resulted in numerous post-closing adjustments, delays in obtaining schedules and supporting documents and numerous revisions to schedule of federal expenditures. Criteria: Management and those charged with governance are responsible for the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of consolidated financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error. Cause: Turnover of key personnel during 2024, and general lack of implementation of U.S. GAAP, did not allow for consistent and effective implementation of existing internal controls over financial reporting. Effect: Certain internal controls were not consistently, or effectively, implemented, and numerous post-closing adjustments were required to correct identified misstatements during the audit. Recommendation: We recommend the Organization add personnel to the accounting/finance team and continue improving and training the accounting positions for the purpose of effective design and implementation of internal controls over financial reporting. Further, we recommend management evaluate the design of internal controls over the financial closing and reporting process to ensure adequate closing procedures, including implementation of a detailed monthly close checklist to include review of key account reconciliations, journal entries, and non-routine transactions at the appropriate level in a timely manner. We also recommend the Organization create a robust year-end reporting checklist that provides for proper recording of transactions in accordance with U.S. GAAP and includes cut-off procedures to ensure transactions are captured in the correct period. The implementation of these checklists will minimize the number of misstatements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management concurs and has provided a Corrective Action Plan which is included at the end of this report
Finding number: 2024-001 Condition: During our audit, we noted that, due to turnover within the finance department, the Organization was not able to implement adequate internal controls over the consolidated financial statement closing and reporting process to allow for timely preparation and review of year-end reconciliations and schedules which resulted in numerous post-closing adjustments, delays in obtaining schedules and supporting documents and numerous revisions to schedule of federal expenditures. Criteria: Management and those charged with governance are responsible for the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of consolidated financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error. Cause: Turnover of key personnel during 2024, and general lack of implementation of U.S. GAAP, did not allow for consistent and effective implementation of existing internal controls over financial reporting. Effect: Certain internal controls were not consistently, or effectively, implemented, and numerous post-closing adjustments were required to correct identified misstatements during the audit. Recommendation: We recommend the Organization add personnel to the accounting/finance team and continue improving and training the accounting positions for the purpose of effective design and implementation of internal controls over financial reporting. Further, we recommend management evaluate the design of internal controls over the financial closing and reporting process to ensure adequate closing procedures, including implementation of a detailed monthly close checklist to include review of key account reconciliations, journal entries, and non-routine transactions at the appropriate level in a timely manner. We also recommend the Organization create a robust year-end reporting checklist that provides for proper recording of transactions in accordance with U.S. GAAP and includes cut-off procedures to ensure transactions are captured in the correct period. The implementation of these checklists will minimize the number of misstatements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management concurs and has provided a Corrective Action Plan which is included at the end of this report
Finding number: 2024-001 Condition: During our audit, we noted that, due to turnover within the finance department, the Organization was not able to implement adequate internal controls over the consolidated financial statement closing and reporting process to allow for timely preparation and review of year-end reconciliations and schedules which resulted in numerous post-closing adjustments, delays in obtaining schedules and supporting documents and numerous revisions to schedule of federal expenditures. Criteria: Management and those charged with governance are responsible for the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of consolidated financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error. Cause: Turnover of key personnel during 2024, and general lack of implementation of U.S. GAAP, did not allow for consistent and effective implementation of existing internal controls over financial reporting. Effect: Certain internal controls were not consistently, or effectively, implemented, and numerous post-closing adjustments were required to correct identified misstatements during the audit. Recommendation: We recommend the Organization add personnel to the accounting/finance team and continue improving and training the accounting positions for the purpose of effective design and implementation of internal controls over financial reporting. Further, we recommend management evaluate the design of internal controls over the financial closing and reporting process to ensure adequate closing procedures, including implementation of a detailed monthly close checklist to include review of key account reconciliations, journal entries, and non-routine transactions at the appropriate level in a timely manner. We also recommend the Organization create a robust year-end reporting checklist that provides for proper recording of transactions in accordance with U.S. GAAP and includes cut-off procedures to ensure transactions are captured in the correct period. The implementation of these checklists will minimize the number of misstatements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management concurs and has provided a Corrective Action Plan which is included at the end of this report
Finding number: 2024-001 Condition: During our audit, we noted that, due to turnover within the finance department, the Organization was not able to implement adequate internal controls over the consolidated financial statement closing and reporting process to allow for timely preparation and review of year-end reconciliations and schedules which resulted in numerous post-closing adjustments, delays in obtaining schedules and supporting documents and numerous revisions to schedule of federal expenditures. Criteria: Management and those charged with governance are responsible for the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of consolidated financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error. Cause: Turnover of key personnel during 2024, and general lack of implementation of U.S. GAAP, did not allow for consistent and effective implementation of existing internal controls over financial reporting. Effect: Certain internal controls were not consistently, or effectively, implemented, and numerous post-closing adjustments were required to correct identified misstatements during the audit. Recommendation: We recommend the Organization add personnel to the accounting/finance team and continue improving and training the accounting positions for the purpose of effective design and implementation of internal controls over financial reporting. Further, we recommend management evaluate the design of internal controls over the financial closing and reporting process to ensure adequate closing procedures, including implementation of a detailed monthly close checklist to include review of key account reconciliations, journal entries, and non-routine transactions at the appropriate level in a timely manner. We also recommend the Organization create a robust year-end reporting checklist that provides for proper recording of transactions in accordance with U.S. GAAP and includes cut-off procedures to ensure transactions are captured in the correct period. The implementation of these checklists will minimize the number of misstatements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management concurs and has provided a Corrective Action Plan which is included at the end of this report
Finding number: 2024-001 Condition: During our audit, we noted that, due to turnover within the finance department, the Organization was not able to implement adequate internal controls over the consolidated financial statement closing and reporting process to allow for timely preparation and review of year-end reconciliations and schedules which resulted in numerous post-closing adjustments, delays in obtaining schedules and supporting documents and numerous revisions to schedule of federal expenditures. Criteria: Management and those charged with governance are responsible for the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of consolidated financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error. Cause: Turnover of key personnel during 2024, and general lack of implementation of U.S. GAAP, did not allow for consistent and effective implementation of existing internal controls over financial reporting. Effect: Certain internal controls were not consistently, or effectively, implemented, and numerous post-closing adjustments were required to correct identified misstatements during the audit. Recommendation: We recommend the Organization add personnel to the accounting/finance team and continue improving and training the accounting positions for the purpose of effective design and implementation of internal controls over financial reporting. Further, we recommend management evaluate the design of internal controls over the financial closing and reporting process to ensure adequate closing procedures, including implementation of a detailed monthly close checklist to include review of key account reconciliations, journal entries, and non-routine transactions at the appropriate level in a timely manner. We also recommend the Organization create a robust year-end reporting checklist that provides for proper recording of transactions in accordance with U.S. GAAP and includes cut-off procedures to ensure transactions are captured in the correct period. The implementation of these checklists will minimize the number of misstatements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management concurs and has provided a Corrective Action Plan which is included at the end of this report
Finding number: 2024-001 Condition: During our audit, we noted that, due to turnover within the finance department, the Organization was not able to implement adequate internal controls over the consolidated financial statement closing and reporting process to allow for timely preparation and review of year-end reconciliations and schedules which resulted in numerous post-closing adjustments, delays in obtaining schedules and supporting documents and numerous revisions to schedule of federal expenditures. Criteria: Management and those charged with governance are responsible for the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of consolidated financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error. Cause: Turnover of key personnel during 2024, and general lack of implementation of U.S. GAAP, did not allow for consistent and effective implementation of existing internal controls over financial reporting. Effect: Certain internal controls were not consistently, or effectively, implemented, and numerous post-closing adjustments were required to correct identified misstatements during the audit. Recommendation: We recommend the Organization add personnel to the accounting/finance team and continue improving and training the accounting positions for the purpose of effective design and implementation of internal controls over financial reporting. Further, we recommend management evaluate the design of internal controls over the financial closing and reporting process to ensure adequate closing procedures, including implementation of a detailed monthly close checklist to include review of key account reconciliations, journal entries, and non-routine transactions at the appropriate level in a timely manner. We also recommend the Organization create a robust year-end reporting checklist that provides for proper recording of transactions in accordance with U.S. GAAP and includes cut-off procedures to ensure transactions are captured in the correct period. The implementation of these checklists will minimize the number of misstatements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management concurs and has provided a Corrective Action Plan which is included at the end of this report
Finding number: 2024-001 Condition: During our audit, we noted that, due to turnover within the finance department, the Organization was not able to implement adequate internal controls over the consolidated financial statement closing and reporting process to allow for timely preparation and review of year-end reconciliations and schedules which resulted in numerous post-closing adjustments, delays in obtaining schedules and supporting documents and numerous revisions to schedule of federal expenditures. Criteria: Management and those charged with governance are responsible for the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of consolidated financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error. Cause: Turnover of key personnel during 2024, and general lack of implementation of U.S. GAAP, did not allow for consistent and effective implementation of existing internal controls over financial reporting. Effect: Certain internal controls were not consistently, or effectively, implemented, and numerous post-closing adjustments were required to correct identified misstatements during the audit. Recommendation: We recommend the Organization add personnel to the accounting/finance team and continue improving and training the accounting positions for the purpose of effective design and implementation of internal controls over financial reporting. Further, we recommend management evaluate the design of internal controls over the financial closing and reporting process to ensure adequate closing procedures, including implementation of a detailed monthly close checklist to include review of key account reconciliations, journal entries, and non-routine transactions at the appropriate level in a timely manner. We also recommend the Organization create a robust year-end reporting checklist that provides for proper recording of transactions in accordance with U.S. GAAP and includes cut-off procedures to ensure transactions are captured in the correct period. The implementation of these checklists will minimize the number of misstatements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management concurs and has provided a Corrective Action Plan which is included at the end of this report
Finding number: 2024-001 Condition: During our audit, we noted that, due to turnover within the finance department, the Organization was not able to implement adequate internal controls over the consolidated financial statement closing and reporting process to allow for timely preparation and review of year-end reconciliations and schedules which resulted in numerous post-closing adjustments, delays in obtaining schedules and supporting documents and numerous revisions to schedule of federal expenditures. Criteria: Management and those charged with governance are responsible for the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of consolidated financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error. Cause: Turnover of key personnel during 2024, and general lack of implementation of U.S. GAAP, did not allow for consistent and effective implementation of existing internal controls over financial reporting. Effect: Certain internal controls were not consistently, or effectively, implemented, and numerous post-closing adjustments were required to correct identified misstatements during the audit. Recommendation: We recommend the Organization add personnel to the accounting/finance team and continue improving and training the accounting positions for the purpose of effective design and implementation of internal controls over financial reporting. Further, we recommend management evaluate the design of internal controls over the financial closing and reporting process to ensure adequate closing procedures, including implementation of a detailed monthly close checklist to include review of key account reconciliations, journal entries, and non-routine transactions at the appropriate level in a timely manner. We also recommend the Organization create a robust year-end reporting checklist that provides for proper recording of transactions in accordance with U.S. GAAP and includes cut-off procedures to ensure transactions are captured in the correct period. The implementation of these checklists will minimize the number of misstatements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management concurs and has provided a Corrective Action Plan which is included at the end of this report
Finding number: 2024-001 Condition: During our audit, we noted that, due to turnover within the finance department, the Organization was not able to implement adequate internal controls over the consolidated financial statement closing and reporting process to allow for timely preparation and review of year-end reconciliations and schedules which resulted in numerous post-closing adjustments, delays in obtaining schedules and supporting documents and numerous revisions to schedule of federal expenditures. Criteria: Management and those charged with governance are responsible for the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of consolidated financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error. Cause: Turnover of key personnel during 2024, and general lack of implementation of U.S. GAAP, did not allow for consistent and effective implementation of existing internal controls over financial reporting. Effect: Certain internal controls were not consistently, or effectively, implemented, and numerous post-closing adjustments were required to correct identified misstatements during the audit. Recommendation: We recommend the Organization add personnel to the accounting/finance team and continue improving and training the accounting positions for the purpose of effective design and implementation of internal controls over financial reporting. Further, we recommend management evaluate the design of internal controls over the financial closing and reporting process to ensure adequate closing procedures, including implementation of a detailed monthly close checklist to include review of key account reconciliations, journal entries, and non-routine transactions at the appropriate level in a timely manner. We also recommend the Organization create a robust year-end reporting checklist that provides for proper recording of transactions in accordance with U.S. GAAP and includes cut-off procedures to ensure transactions are captured in the correct period. The implementation of these checklists will minimize the number of misstatements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management concurs and has provided a Corrective Action Plan which is included at the end of this report
Finding number: 2024-005 Significant Deficiency – Lack of Internal Control Over Compliance with Subrecipient Monitoring Policy Assistance Listing Number #21.027 Criteria: Pursuant to CFR section 200.332(b), pass-through entities must evaluate each subrecipient's risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring. Condition: The Unity Council did not perform a risk assessment of subrecipients. This is a repeat finding. Cause: The Organization does not have a formally documented policy for performing a risk assessment over subrecipients. Effect or potential effect: A risk assessment for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring was not performed. Recommendation: Management should develop a risk assessment policy to evaluate the risk profile of each subrecipient. Factors included during the evaluation can include the subrecipient's prior experience with the same or similar subawards, results of previous audits, whether the subrecipient has new personnel or new or substantially changed systems, and the extent and results of federal awarding agency monitoring. View of responsible officials: Management is in agreement with the finding and is in the process of developing and documenting a more robust risk assessment process.
Finding number: 2024-005 Significant Deficiency – Lack of Internal Control Over Compliance with Subrecipient Monitoring Policy Assistance Listing Number #21.027 Criteria: Pursuant to CFR section 200.332(b), pass-through entities must evaluate each subrecipient's risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring. Condition: The Unity Council did not perform a risk assessment of subrecipients. This is a repeat finding. Cause: The Organization does not have a formally documented policy for performing a risk assessment over subrecipients. Effect or potential effect: A risk assessment for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring was not performed. Recommendation: Management should develop a risk assessment policy to evaluate the risk profile of each subrecipient. Factors included during the evaluation can include the subrecipient's prior experience with the same or similar subawards, results of previous audits, whether the subrecipient has new personnel or new or substantially changed systems, and the extent and results of federal awarding agency monitoring. View of responsible officials: Management is in agreement with the finding and is in the process of developing and documenting a more robust risk assessment process.
Finding number: 2024-005 Significant Deficiency – Lack of Internal Control Over Compliance with Subrecipient Monitoring Policy Assistance Listing Number #21.027 Criteria: Pursuant to CFR section 200.332(b), pass-through entities must evaluate each subrecipient's risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring. Condition: The Unity Council did not perform a risk assessment of subrecipients. This is a repeat finding. Cause: The Organization does not have a formally documented policy for performing a risk assessment over subrecipients. Effect or potential effect: A risk assessment for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring was not performed. Recommendation: Management should develop a risk assessment policy to evaluate the risk profile of each subrecipient. Factors included during the evaluation can include the subrecipient's prior experience with the same or similar subawards, results of previous audits, whether the subrecipient has new personnel or new or substantially changed systems, and the extent and results of federal awarding agency monitoring. View of responsible officials: Management is in agreement with the finding and is in the process of developing and documenting a more robust risk assessment process.
Finding number: 2024-005 Significant Deficiency – Lack of Internal Control Over Compliance with Subrecipient Monitoring Policy Assistance Listing Number #21.027 Criteria: Pursuant to CFR section 200.332(b), pass-through entities must evaluate each subrecipient's risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring. Condition: The Unity Council did not perform a risk assessment of subrecipients. This is a repeat finding. Cause: The Organization does not have a formally documented policy for performing a risk assessment over subrecipients. Effect or potential effect: A risk assessment for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring was not performed. Recommendation: Management should develop a risk assessment policy to evaluate the risk profile of each subrecipient. Factors included during the evaluation can include the subrecipient's prior experience with the same or similar subawards, results of previous audits, whether the subrecipient has new personnel or new or substantially changed systems, and the extent and results of federal awarding agency monitoring. View of responsible officials: Management is in agreement with the finding and is in the process of developing and documenting a more robust risk assessment process.
Finding number: 2024-005 Significant Deficiency – Lack of Internal Control Over Compliance with Subrecipient Monitoring Policy Assistance Listing Number #21.027 Criteria: Pursuant to CFR section 200.332(b), pass-through entities must evaluate each subrecipient's risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring. Condition: The Unity Council did not perform a risk assessment of subrecipients. This is a repeat finding. Cause: The Organization does not have a formally documented policy for performing a risk assessment over subrecipients. Effect or potential effect: A risk assessment for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring was not performed. Recommendation: Management should develop a risk assessment policy to evaluate the risk profile of each subrecipient. Factors included during the evaluation can include the subrecipient's prior experience with the same or similar subawards, results of previous audits, whether the subrecipient has new personnel or new or substantially changed systems, and the extent and results of federal awarding agency monitoring. View of responsible officials: Management is in agreement with the finding and is in the process of developing and documenting a more robust risk assessment process.