Audit 361030

FY End
2024-09-30
Total Expended
$3.52M
Findings
2
Programs
9
Organization: Hardee County, Fl (FL)
Year: 2024 Accepted: 2025-06-30

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
569690 2024-003 Material Weakness - G
1146132 2024-003 Material Weakness - G

Contacts

Name Title Type
Q11TSMH2P7X6 Lorie Ayers Auditee
8637736349 Julie Fowler Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Accounting Policies: BASIS OF PRESENTATION The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards and State Financial Assistance (Schedule) includes the federal award and state financial assistance activity of Hardee County, Florida (County) under programs of the federal government and projects of the state of Florida for the year ended September 30, 2024. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) and Chapter 69I-5, Rules of the Florida Department of Financial Services. Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operation of the County, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net position, or cash flows of the County. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the modified accrual basis of accounting for awards and financial assistance received in governmental funds and the accrual basis of accounting for financial assistance received in the proprietary funds, which are described in Note 1 to the County’s basic financial statements. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance and Chapter 69I-5, Rules of the Florida Department of Financial Services, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Under these principles, certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Any negative amounts shown in the Schedule represent adjustments or credits made in the normal course of business to amounts reported as expenditures in prior years. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The County had not elected to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under Uniform Guidance.

Finding Details

Earmarking Federal Agency: Department of Homeland Security Federal Program Name: Disaster Grant Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters) Assistance Listing Number: 97.036 Grant Award Number: 4337DR-FL-2024 Award Period: Various Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Other Matters Criteria: Compliance: 2 CFR 200.302(b)(3) states that records that identify adequately the source and application of funds for federally-funded activities. These records must contain information pertaining to Federal awards, authorizations, financial obligations, unobligated balances, assets, expenditures, income and interest and be supported by source documentation. Per 2 CFR section 200.303(a), a non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should comply with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the” Internal Control Integrated Framework,” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition: Management costs requested and received from FEMA exceeded the 5% threshold. Questioned Costs: $35,572. Context: Received the total award amount for calculation of the 5% threshold. Compared to the management costs requested and received. Cause: The County requested management fees unaware of the total expenditure amount. Effect: Over request of management fees leads to unallowable costs. Repeat finding: No Recommendation: Provide clear, updated guidance and periodic training sessions on earmarking rules and how to apply them. Conduct reviews of earmarking compliance. View responsible official and planned corrective actions: New procedures will be implemented that strengthen internal controls to ensure clear earmarking guidance and initial review of compliances.
Earmarking Federal Agency: Department of Homeland Security Federal Program Name: Disaster Grant Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters) Assistance Listing Number: 97.036 Grant Award Number: 4337DR-FL-2024 Award Period: Various Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Other Matters Criteria: Compliance: 2 CFR 200.302(b)(3) states that records that identify adequately the source and application of funds for federally-funded activities. These records must contain information pertaining to Federal awards, authorizations, financial obligations, unobligated balances, assets, expenditures, income and interest and be supported by source documentation. Per 2 CFR section 200.303(a), a non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should comply with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the” Internal Control Integrated Framework,” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition: Management costs requested and received from FEMA exceeded the 5% threshold. Questioned Costs: $35,572. Context: Received the total award amount for calculation of the 5% threshold. Compared to the management costs requested and received. Cause: The County requested management fees unaware of the total expenditure amount. Effect: Over request of management fees leads to unallowable costs. Repeat finding: No Recommendation: Provide clear, updated guidance and periodic training sessions on earmarking rules and how to apply them. Conduct reviews of earmarking compliance. View responsible official and planned corrective actions: New procedures will be implemented that strengthen internal controls to ensure clear earmarking guidance and initial review of compliances.