Audit 361029

FY End
2024-09-30
Total Expended
$1.24M
Findings
2
Programs
4
Year: 2024 Accepted: 2025-06-30

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
569689 2024-001 Material Weakness - H
1146131 2024-001 Material Weakness - H

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
93.369 Acl Independent Living State Grants $375,000 - 0
21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds $51,566 - 0
93.464 Acl Assistive Technology $39,316 Yes 0
84.224D Freedom Tech Low-Interest Loan Program $241 - 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
VT6ZZBTZ82W6 Judith Cabrera Auditee
8317572968 Ingrid Sheipline Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: BASIS OF PRESENTATION Accounting Policies: Expenses reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenses are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance and/or OMB Circular A-122, Cost Principles for Non-Profit Organizations, wherein certain types of expenses are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Foundation has elected not to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate under the Uniform Guidance. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards includes the federal grant activity of the Foundation under programs of the federal government for the year ended September 30, 2024. The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the Foundation’s operations, it is not intended to be and does not present the financial position, changes in net position, or cash flows of the Foundation.
Title: SUBRECIPIENTS Accounting Policies: Expenses reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenses are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance and/or OMB Circular A-122, Cost Principles for Non-Profit Organizations, wherein certain types of expenses are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Foundation has elected not to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate under the Uniform Guidance. There were no subrecipients of the Foundation’s programs during the year ended September 30, 2024.
Title: PROGRAM COSTS/MATCHING CONTRIBUTIONS Accounting Policies: Expenses reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenses are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance and/or OMB Circular A-122, Cost Principles for Non-Profit Organizations, wherein certain types of expenses are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Foundation has elected not to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate under the Uniform Guidance. The amounts shown as current year expenses represent only the federal grant portion of the program costs. Entire program costs, including the Foundation’s portion, may be more than shown.
Title: NONCASH AWARDS Accounting Policies: Expenses reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenses are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance and/or OMB Circular A-122, Cost Principles for Non-Profit Organizations, wherein certain types of expenses are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Foundation has elected not to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate under the Uniform Guidance. No noncash awards existed in the current year.

Finding Details

Finding 2024-001: Material Weakness – Period of Performance Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Compliance Requirement: Period of PerformanceCondition: We identified expenditures totaling $273,298 that were charged to the 93.464 program but were incurred after year-end. As a result, these costs were recorded in an incorrect accounting period, causing an overbilling of the grantor for expenses not properly attributable to the fiscal year under audit. Criteria: Cost is allowable only if it is consistently treated in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). Costs must be recorded in the correct accounting period to ensure accurate reporting and prevent overstatement or understatement of grant expenditures. Cause: The expenses were recorded based on the purchase order date of September 30, which coincided with the fiscal year-end. However, the actual expenses were incurred after year-end, in the subsequent accounting period. The Foundation’s procedures did not ensure that expenses were recognized based on when the costs were actually incurred, resulting in misclassification of expenses in the wrong accounting period. Effect: The overbilling may result in questioned costs and noncompliance with federal regulations, potentially requiring reimbursement to the grantor. This misstatement also affects the accuracy of financial reporting for the fiscal year. Recommendation: We recommend that CFILC strengthen its expense recognition procedures to ensure that costs are recorded in the accounting period in which services are actually received or performed, regardless of the purchase order date. This should include implementing a review process at fiscal yearend to identify and properly accrue expenses incurred after year-end. Additionally, staff responsible for financial reporting and grant billing should be trained on the importance of accurate period cutoff to prevent overbilling and ensure compliance with federal cost principles. Response: We concur with the finding and will develop policies and processes to correct this issue.
Finding 2024-001: Material Weakness – Period of Performance Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Compliance Requirement: Period of PerformanceCondition: We identified expenditures totaling $273,298 that were charged to the 93.464 program but were incurred after year-end. As a result, these costs were recorded in an incorrect accounting period, causing an overbilling of the grantor for expenses not properly attributable to the fiscal year under audit. Criteria: Cost is allowable only if it is consistently treated in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). Costs must be recorded in the correct accounting period to ensure accurate reporting and prevent overstatement or understatement of grant expenditures. Cause: The expenses were recorded based on the purchase order date of September 30, which coincided with the fiscal year-end. However, the actual expenses were incurred after year-end, in the subsequent accounting period. The Foundation’s procedures did not ensure that expenses were recognized based on when the costs were actually incurred, resulting in misclassification of expenses in the wrong accounting period. Effect: The overbilling may result in questioned costs and noncompliance with federal regulations, potentially requiring reimbursement to the grantor. This misstatement also affects the accuracy of financial reporting for the fiscal year. Recommendation: We recommend that CFILC strengthen its expense recognition procedures to ensure that costs are recorded in the accounting period in which services are actually received or performed, regardless of the purchase order date. This should include implementing a review process at fiscal yearend to identify and properly accrue expenses incurred after year-end. Additionally, staff responsible for financial reporting and grant billing should be trained on the importance of accurate period cutoff to prevent overbilling and ensure compliance with federal cost principles. Response: We concur with the finding and will develop policies and processes to correct this issue.