Audit 36057

FY End
2022-06-30
Total Expended
$1.02M
Findings
2
Programs
1
Year: 2022 Accepted: 2022-12-30

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
36765 2022-002 Material Weakness - B
613207 2022-002 Material Weakness - B

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
14.157 Supportive Housing for the Elderly $1.02M Yes 1

Contacts

Name Title Type
U4KZCTEJFR43 Nancy Bentley Auditee
3086320473 Jeff Wiens Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Loan/loan guarantee outstanding balances Accounting Policies: The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards includes the federal grant activity of Gering Elderly Housing Corporation, d/b/a Grey Eagle Apartments, HUD Project 103-ED076 and is presented on the accrual basis of accounting. The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Costs Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimis cost rate. SUPPORTIVE HOUSING FOR THE ELDERLY (14.157) - Balances outstanding at the end of the audit period were 964500.

Finding Details

Finding 2022-002: Allowable Costs Section 202 Capital Advance, 14.157 Material Weakness Criteria: The Project?s Capital Advance Program Regulatory Agreement with HUD requires an annual operating budget. Further, the budget is an essential internal control tool to ensure funds will be available when needed and also provides an ongoing check for reasonableness through comparing actual revenues and expenses against the budget. The budget is an essential part in assuring all costs incurred by the Project are allowable. Condition: During our audit, we noted neither entity that provided management services during the year was able to provide an operating budget for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2022. We did note the Project did have other controls to ensure all costs incurred were allowable with multiple levels of review but the budget to actual comparison was not done to determine total expense levels were appropriate. Cause: Management did not prepare a budget for the year ended June 30, 2022. Effect or Potential Effect: The Project did not have adequate internal controls over allowable costs. Recommendation: The Project should establish procedures to annually adopt a budget. It should be noted the Project had adopted a budget for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2023. View of the Responsible Officials of the Auditee: The auditee?s management agrees with the finding.
Finding 2022-002: Allowable Costs Section 202 Capital Advance, 14.157 Material Weakness Criteria: The Project?s Capital Advance Program Regulatory Agreement with HUD requires an annual operating budget. Further, the budget is an essential internal control tool to ensure funds will be available when needed and also provides an ongoing check for reasonableness through comparing actual revenues and expenses against the budget. The budget is an essential part in assuring all costs incurred by the Project are allowable. Condition: During our audit, we noted neither entity that provided management services during the year was able to provide an operating budget for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2022. We did note the Project did have other controls to ensure all costs incurred were allowable with multiple levels of review but the budget to actual comparison was not done to determine total expense levels were appropriate. Cause: Management did not prepare a budget for the year ended June 30, 2022. Effect or Potential Effect: The Project did not have adequate internal controls over allowable costs. Recommendation: The Project should establish procedures to annually adopt a budget. It should be noted the Project had adopted a budget for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2023. View of the Responsible Officials of the Auditee: The auditee?s management agrees with the finding.