Audit 359998

FY End
2024-06-30
Total Expended
$1.00M
Findings
4
Programs
1
Year: 2024 Accepted: 2025-06-26
Auditor: Blue & CO LLC

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
567123 2024-008 Significant Deficiency - I
567124 2024-009 Significant Deficiency - L
1143565 2024-008 Significant Deficiency - I
1143566 2024-009 Significant Deficiency - L

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds $1.00M Yes 2

Contacts

Name Title Type
GKREQX98EHL5 Jim Conklin Auditee
5748764540 Allen Norvell, CPA Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Basis of Presentation Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Organization has elected not to use the 10 percent de minimis cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the "Schedule") includes the federal award activity of Cultivate Culinary School and Catering Inc. (the “Organization”) under programs of the federal government for the year ended June 30, 2024. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the Organization, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net assets, or cash flows of Cultivate Culinary School and Catering Inc.
Title: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Organization has elected not to use the 10 percent de minimis cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance. Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement.
Title: Indirect Cost Rate Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Organization has elected not to use the 10 percent de minimis cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance. The Organization has elected not to use the 10 percent de minimis cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance.

Finding Details

Finding Reference Number: 2024-008. Federal Program: AL 21.027 – COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Recovery Funds. Passed through Entity: County of St. Joseph, Indiana. Compliance Requirements: Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment. Type of Finding : Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance. Criteria: Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) requires nonfederal entities to have a procurement policy in accordance with the Uniform Guidance requirements. 2 CFR Section 200.214 requires non-federal entities to follow suspension and debarment regulations outlined in 2 CFR part 180. When a nonfederal entity enters a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the nonfederal entity must verify the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. Condition and Context: There is no procedure in place to determine whether vendors are suspended or debarred. For our sample of one, representing the entire population, the entity did not have documentation to support a check of a suspension and debarment on the vendor it entered into a transaction. Questioned Costs: No costs are required to be questioned as a result of this finding as none of the vendors or subrecipients involved were actually suspended or debarred. Cause: The Organization did not have a procedure in place to require documentation be maintained that the search for suspension and debarment associated with procurement transactions in excess of the $25,000 threshold had been performed prior to procurement. Effect or Potential Effect: Costs charged to federal awards could be paid to a person/vendor that has been debarred or suspended by the Federal government. This could lead to costs charged to the federal award to be subject to disallowance resulting in noncompliance. Recommendation: We recommend the Organization implement a policy over suspension and debarment review to ensure they are maintaining compliance and controls over verifying or contracting with vendors that are allowable. Views of responsible officials: Management acknowledges the finding and understands the need to perform a review of vendors paid using federal grant funds to determine if they are suspended or debarred.
Finding Reference Number: 2024-009. Federal Program: AL 21.027 –COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Recovery Funds. Passed through Entity: County of St. Joseph, Indiana. Compliance Requirements: Reporting. Type of Finding : Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance. Criteria: Recipients of federal awards are required to report periodically on financial information, as specified by the 2 CFR 200 Compliance Supplement or grant agreement. Reported information should be supported by the entity’s accounting records and subjected to an independent review and approval prior to submission in order to detect and correct any errors or omissions. Condition and Context: The report selected for testing, representing the entire population, did not included documentation that was subject to an independent review and approval prior to submission to detect and correct potential errors or omissions and verify timely submission. Questioned Costs: Not applicable. Cause: The Organization lacks a robust internal control process to ensure all financial reports required by federal grants are independently reviewed and approved before submission. This may be due to inadequate staffing, insufficient training, or lack of established procedures. Effect or Potential Effect: Without an independent review and approval process, there is an increased risk of errors or omissions in the financial reports, which could lead to non-compliance with federal reporting requirements. This could result in potential financial penalties, loss of funding, or damage to the Organization's reputation. Recommendation: The Organization should implement a formal internal control process that includes independent review and approval of all financial reports before submission. This process should be documented and communicated to all relevant staff. Additionally, the Organization should provide training to ensure that staff understand the importance of this control and how to properly execute it. Regular monitoring and periodic verification should be conducted to ensure compliance with this process. Views of responsible officials: Management acknowledges the finding and understands the need to complete and submit timely any required reporting to federal grantors as outlined by the notice of award, federal regulations, and/or grant agreement.
Finding Reference Number: 2024-008. Federal Program: AL 21.027 – COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Recovery Funds. Passed through Entity: County of St. Joseph, Indiana. Compliance Requirements: Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment. Type of Finding : Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance. Criteria: Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) requires nonfederal entities to have a procurement policy in accordance with the Uniform Guidance requirements. 2 CFR Section 200.214 requires non-federal entities to follow suspension and debarment regulations outlined in 2 CFR part 180. When a nonfederal entity enters a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the nonfederal entity must verify the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. Condition and Context: There is no procedure in place to determine whether vendors are suspended or debarred. For our sample of one, representing the entire population, the entity did not have documentation to support a check of a suspension and debarment on the vendor it entered into a transaction. Questioned Costs: No costs are required to be questioned as a result of this finding as none of the vendors or subrecipients involved were actually suspended or debarred. Cause: The Organization did not have a procedure in place to require documentation be maintained that the search for suspension and debarment associated with procurement transactions in excess of the $25,000 threshold had been performed prior to procurement. Effect or Potential Effect: Costs charged to federal awards could be paid to a person/vendor that has been debarred or suspended by the Federal government. This could lead to costs charged to the federal award to be subject to disallowance resulting in noncompliance. Recommendation: We recommend the Organization implement a policy over suspension and debarment review to ensure they are maintaining compliance and controls over verifying or contracting with vendors that are allowable. Views of responsible officials: Management acknowledges the finding and understands the need to perform a review of vendors paid using federal grant funds to determine if they are suspended or debarred.
Finding Reference Number: 2024-009. Federal Program: AL 21.027 –COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Recovery Funds. Passed through Entity: County of St. Joseph, Indiana. Compliance Requirements: Reporting. Type of Finding : Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance. Criteria: Recipients of federal awards are required to report periodically on financial information, as specified by the 2 CFR 200 Compliance Supplement or grant agreement. Reported information should be supported by the entity’s accounting records and subjected to an independent review and approval prior to submission in order to detect and correct any errors or omissions. Condition and Context: The report selected for testing, representing the entire population, did not included documentation that was subject to an independent review and approval prior to submission to detect and correct potential errors or omissions and verify timely submission. Questioned Costs: Not applicable. Cause: The Organization lacks a robust internal control process to ensure all financial reports required by federal grants are independently reviewed and approved before submission. This may be due to inadequate staffing, insufficient training, or lack of established procedures. Effect or Potential Effect: Without an independent review and approval process, there is an increased risk of errors or omissions in the financial reports, which could lead to non-compliance with federal reporting requirements. This could result in potential financial penalties, loss of funding, or damage to the Organization's reputation. Recommendation: The Organization should implement a formal internal control process that includes independent review and approval of all financial reports before submission. This process should be documented and communicated to all relevant staff. Additionally, the Organization should provide training to ensure that staff understand the importance of this control and how to properly execute it. Regular monitoring and periodic verification should be conducted to ensure compliance with this process. Views of responsible officials: Management acknowledges the finding and understands the need to complete and submit timely any required reporting to federal grantors as outlined by the notice of award, federal regulations, and/or grant agreement.