Audit 359923

FY End
2024-09-30
Total Expended
$8.65M
Findings
2
Programs
8
Year: 2024 Accepted: 2025-06-25

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
567014 2024-001 Material Weakness - L
1143456 2024-001 Material Weakness - L

Contacts

Name Title Type
KVP5MJSZNCE3 Debra, Gibson Auditee
8502335100 Joann, Rocque Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Note 3 Accounting Policies: The City follows the modified accrual basis of accounting in preparing this schedule. This method is consistent with the preparation of the City's financial statements. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The City has not elected to use the 10 percent de minimis cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. here are $111,082 in prior year expenses included in the current year schedule of expenditures of federal awards for ALN # 97.039.

Finding Details

2024-001 Lack of Documented Review of Annual Project and Expenditure Report Assisted Listing Number: 21.027 Program Title: COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Compliance Requirement: Reporting- Performance Reporting Pass-through Entity: N/A Federal Grant/Contract Number and Grant Year: COVID-19 Y5258 2021 Finding Type: Material Weakness in Internal Control Questioned Costs: $0 Condition: The annual project and expenditure report required by the grant related to the status of projects was prepared by the grant administrator and there was no documented review of the report by someone other than the preparer prior to submission. The recipient is required to file annually a project and expenditure report with the U.S. Treasury. Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 requires that nonfederal entities receiving federal awards establish and maintain internal control over the federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal awards. Effect: Annual report could include potential errors and cause the City to be out of compliance with the requirement of the grant. Cause: The City has not implemented procedures to formally document their review of the annual project and expenditures report prior to submission to the U.S. Treasury. Perspective: The one report required to be filed did not have documentation of review. Recommendation: A copy of the report should be kept which includes both the date and signature of the preparer and the reviewer. View of responsible officials and planned corrective action: See attached corrective action plan.
2024-001 Lack of Documented Review of Annual Project and Expenditure Report Assisted Listing Number: 21.027 Program Title: COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Compliance Requirement: Reporting- Performance Reporting Pass-through Entity: N/A Federal Grant/Contract Number and Grant Year: COVID-19 Y5258 2021 Finding Type: Material Weakness in Internal Control Questioned Costs: $0 Condition: The annual project and expenditure report required by the grant related to the status of projects was prepared by the grant administrator and there was no documented review of the report by someone other than the preparer prior to submission. The recipient is required to file annually a project and expenditure report with the U.S. Treasury. Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 requires that nonfederal entities receiving federal awards establish and maintain internal control over the federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal awards. Effect: Annual report could include potential errors and cause the City to be out of compliance with the requirement of the grant. Cause: The City has not implemented procedures to formally document their review of the annual project and expenditures report prior to submission to the U.S. Treasury. Perspective: The one report required to be filed did not have documentation of review. Recommendation: A copy of the report should be kept which includes both the date and signature of the preparer and the reviewer. View of responsible officials and planned corrective action: See attached corrective action plan.