Audit 359201

FY End
2023-12-31
Total Expended
$1.52M
Findings
2
Programs
11
Organization: Women's Center for Advancement (NE)
Year: 2023 Accepted: 2025-06-18
Auditor: Eide Bailly LLP

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Contacts

Name Title Type
D8U3TMZK6LL9 Kim Reed Auditee
4023456555 Justin Hope Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Accounting Policies: Note 1 Basis of Presentation - The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the “Schedule”) includes the federal award activity of Women's Center for Advancement (the Organization) under programs of the federal government for the year ended December 31, 2023. The information is presented in accordance with the requirements for Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the Organization, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net assets or cash flows of the Organization. Note 2 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies- Expenditures reported in the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. When applicable, such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. No federal financial assistance was provided to a subrecipient. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Organization has elected not to use the 10-percent de minimus indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance.

Finding Details

Criteria: The design or operation of the Organization’s internal controls should allow for management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent or detect misstatements in reporting for grant awards on a timely basis. Condition: Certain underlying support related to the VOCA Victim Assistance Formula Grant did not agree to amounts charged to the grant. Supporting information and records indicated more funds were spent by the Organization than were charged to the grant. Cause: Due to turnover in the accounting department and a lack of appropriate reconciliation and review processes, variances existed between supporting information and records and amounts charged to the grant. Effect: The Organization’s records do not match requests for reimbursement under the grant and the Organization may have not billed and collected for all allowable costs incurred under the grant program. Questioned Costs: None. Context: Reimbursement to organizations is based upon the actual and verifiable expenses incurred on a monthly basis. Expenditures must be in accordance with the terms and conditions of the award and approved project budget. A sample of three monthly reimbursement requests made by the Organization subject to the reporting requirement was selected for testing. Of the three monthly reimbursement requests selected, two of them contained variances between the reported amount of expenditures and the Organization’s underlying supporting documentation. Of the items tested, reported expenditures were overstated by $222 when compared to the Organization’s supporting documentation. Views of Responsible Officials: Management acknowledges that due to turnover and ineffective reconciliation and review processes that variances exist between supporting documentation and records and amounts invoiced or charged to the grant. Management is implementing additional and revised processes and controls to address this oversight in future periods.
Criteria: The design or operation of the Organization’s internal controls should allow for management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent or detect misstatements in reporting for grant awards on a timely basis. Condition: Certain underlying support related to the VOCA Victim Assistance Formula Grant did not agree to amounts charged to the grant. Supporting information and records indicated more funds were spent by the Organization than were charged to the grant. Cause: Due to turnover in the accounting department and a lack of appropriate reconciliation and review processes, variances existed between supporting information and records and amounts charged to the grant. Effect: The Organization’s records do not match requests for reimbursement under the grant and the Organization may have not billed and collected for all allowable costs incurred under the grant program. Questioned Costs: None. Context: Reimbursement to organizations is based upon the actual and verifiable expenses incurred on a monthly basis. Expenditures must be in accordance with the terms and conditions of the award and approved project budget. A sample of three monthly reimbursement requests made by the Organization subject to the reporting requirement was selected for testing. Of the three monthly reimbursement requests selected, two of them contained variances between the reported amount of expenditures and the Organization’s underlying supporting documentation. Of the items tested, reported expenditures were overstated by $222 when compared to the Organization’s supporting documentation. Views of Responsible Officials: Management acknowledges that due to turnover and ineffective reconciliation and review processes that variances exist between supporting documentation and records and amounts invoiced or charged to the grant. Management is implementing additional and revised processes and controls to address this oversight in future periods.