Audit 359149

FY End
2023-12-31
Total Expended
$2.07M
Findings
4
Programs
7
Year: 2023 Accepted: 2025-06-18

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
565325 2023-002 Significant Deficiency - AB
565326 2023-003 Significant Deficiency Yes L
1141767 2023-002 Significant Deficiency - AB
1141768 2023-003 Significant Deficiency Yes L

Contacts

Name Title Type
VADJLG5VNAC4 Alexander Sukalski Auditee
9524057634 Nicki Donlon Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Basis of Presentation Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported in the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Pass-through entity identifying numbers are presented where available. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Wayside House, Inc. and Subsidiary has not elected to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the Schedule) includes federal grant activity of The Wayside House, Inc. and Subsidiary under programs of the federal government for the year ended December 31, 2023. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because this Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of The Wayside House, Inc. and Subsidiary, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net assets or cash flows of The Wayside House, Inc. and Subsidiary.
Title: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported in the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Pass-through entity identifying numbers are presented where available. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Wayside House, Inc. and Subsidiary has not elected to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate. Expenditures reported in the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Pass-through entity identifying numbers are presented where available.
Title: Indirect Cost Rate Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported in the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Pass-through entity identifying numbers are presented where available. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Wayside House, Inc. and Subsidiary has not elected to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate. The Wayside House, Inc. and Subsidiary has not elected to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate.
Title: Loan and Loan Guarantee Program Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported in the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Pass-through entity identifying numbers are presented where available. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Wayside House, Inc. and Subsidiary has not elected to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate. The HOME Investment Partnerships Program loan has a 0.0% interest rate and is due on October 27, 2067 unless a release is provided by Hennepin County. The effective interest rate is 7.75% and the loan is secured by real property located at 1341 and 1349 Jersey Avenue, St. Louis Park. The discounted balance of the loan at December 31, 2023 is $600,000. The Assistance Listing number associated with the loan is 14.239. The Community Development Block Grants/Entitlement Grants Program loan has a 1.0% interest rate which is fully deferred and is due March 11, 2034. The effective interest rate is 5.0% and the loan is secured by real property located at 2120 Clinton Ave South, Minneapolis. The discounted balance of the loan at December 31, 2023 is $178,652. The Assistance Listing number associated with the loan is 14.218.

Finding Details

Finding 2023-002: Significant Deficiency – Activities Allowed or Unallowed Assistance Listing Number (ALN): 93.788 Federal Program: Opioid STR Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass-Through Entity: Minnesota Department of Human Services Federal Award Number: HT79TI083289 and H79TI085729 Federal Award Year: December 31, 2023 Criteria: 2 CFR 200.403(e) and (f) state that charges to federal awards must be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and be adequately documented. These records must be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; and support the distribution of the or costs among specific activities or cost objectives if the expenses supported more than one federal award, or a federal award and non-federal award Condition/Context: Six of the forty non-payroll transactions that were tested did not have evidence of approval for the amount allocated to the federal program, one transaction was recorded in the incorrect period and one transaction did not have evidence of receipt. The Organization experienced an unusually elevated level of turn-over of key personnel in business operations during the period of time that the control procedures lapsed as the individuals replacing those responsible for attaining allocation authorizations were not yet hired or fully trained in their assignments. The sample was not a statistically valid sample. Cause: The Organization's control process for expenditure authorizations was not properly implemented. Effect: Inadequate controls over the allocation of costs could result in unallowable costs being improperly applied to the federal program. Questioned Costs: Not required Recommendation: The Organization should have formal written procedure to ensure that all relevant authorization and reviews have been completed before allocating costs to federal programs. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the auditors' finding and will take action to implement controlling procedures over federal programs.
Finding 2023-003: Significant Deficiency – Reporting Assistance Listing Number (ALN): 93.788 Federal Program: Opioid STR Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass-Through Entity: Minnesota Department of Human Services Federal Award Number: HT79TI083289 and H79TI085729 Federal Award Year: December 31, 2023 Repeat finding of 2022-004 Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states that recipients of federal program funding must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in "Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government" issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the "Internal Control Integrated Framework", issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition/Context: Evidence of proper segregation of duties over the federal program's reporting process could not be provided. Cause: The Organization's process for preparing and submitting required performance reporting was completed by a single individual. Both this individual and the personnel that would have been responsible for reviewing and approving reports submitted to the awarding agency are no longer employees of the Organization. As such there was no evidence provided of segregation of duties or internal control over reporting activities. Effect: Required reports submitted to the awarding agency could be inaccurate. Questioned Costs: None noted. Recommendation: The Organization should have formal policies that provide documentary evidence of proper segregation of duties and control structures over federal program reporting. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the auditors' finding and will take action to implement controlling procedures over federal programs.
Finding 2023-002: Significant Deficiency – Activities Allowed or Unallowed Assistance Listing Number (ALN): 93.788 Federal Program: Opioid STR Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass-Through Entity: Minnesota Department of Human Services Federal Award Number: HT79TI083289 and H79TI085729 Federal Award Year: December 31, 2023 Criteria: 2 CFR 200.403(e) and (f) state that charges to federal awards must be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and be adequately documented. These records must be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; and support the distribution of the or costs among specific activities or cost objectives if the expenses supported more than one federal award, or a federal award and non-federal award Condition/Context: Six of the forty non-payroll transactions that were tested did not have evidence of approval for the amount allocated to the federal program, one transaction was recorded in the incorrect period and one transaction did not have evidence of receipt. The Organization experienced an unusually elevated level of turn-over of key personnel in business operations during the period of time that the control procedures lapsed as the individuals replacing those responsible for attaining allocation authorizations were not yet hired or fully trained in their assignments. The sample was not a statistically valid sample. Cause: The Organization's control process for expenditure authorizations was not properly implemented. Effect: Inadequate controls over the allocation of costs could result in unallowable costs being improperly applied to the federal program. Questioned Costs: Not required Recommendation: The Organization should have formal written procedure to ensure that all relevant authorization and reviews have been completed before allocating costs to federal programs. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the auditors' finding and will take action to implement controlling procedures over federal programs.
Finding 2023-003: Significant Deficiency – Reporting Assistance Listing Number (ALN): 93.788 Federal Program: Opioid STR Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass-Through Entity: Minnesota Department of Human Services Federal Award Number: HT79TI083289 and H79TI085729 Federal Award Year: December 31, 2023 Repeat finding of 2022-004 Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states that recipients of federal program funding must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in "Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government" issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the "Internal Control Integrated Framework", issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition/Context: Evidence of proper segregation of duties over the federal program's reporting process could not be provided. Cause: The Organization's process for preparing and submitting required performance reporting was completed by a single individual. Both this individual and the personnel that would have been responsible for reviewing and approving reports submitted to the awarding agency are no longer employees of the Organization. As such there was no evidence provided of segregation of duties or internal control over reporting activities. Effect: Required reports submitted to the awarding agency could be inaccurate. Questioned Costs: None noted. Recommendation: The Organization should have formal policies that provide documentary evidence of proper segregation of duties and control structures over federal program reporting. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the auditors' finding and will take action to implement controlling procedures over federal programs.