Audit 359016

FY End
2024-09-30
Total Expended
$1.14M
Findings
4
Programs
5
Organization: National Building Museum (DC)
Year: 2024 Accepted: 2025-06-17
Auditor: Citrin Cooperman

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
565079 2024-001 Material Weakness - L
565080 2024-002 Material Weakness - I
1141521 2024-001 Material Weakness - L
1141522 2024-002 Material Weakness - I

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
45.301 Museums for America $492,454 Yes 2
45.164 Promotion of the Humanities Public Programs $400,000 Yes 0
91.U01 National Capital Arts & Cultural Affairs $175,655 - 0
45.024 Promotion of the Arts Grants to Organizations and Individuals $35,000 - 0
15.929 Save America's Treasures $33,806 - 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
D22JDCH8LSM3 Angelique Jordan Auditee
2028492469 John Eusanio Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Basis of Presentation Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Organization has elected not to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the "Schedule") includes the federal award activity of National Building Museum ("Nonprofit Organization") under programs of the federal government for the year ended September 30, 2024. The information in the Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the "Uniform Guidance"). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of Nonprofit Organization, it is not intended to, and does not, present the financial position, changes in net assets, or cash flows of Nonprofit Organization.
Title: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Organization has elected not to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement.
Title: Indirect Cost Rate Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Organization has elected not to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. The Organization has elected not to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance.

Finding Details

Finding 2024-001: Completeness of Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards – Material Weakness Federal Agency: Institute of Museum and Library Services Federal Program Title: Museums for America Federal Assistance Listing Number: 45.301 Compliance Requirement: Reporting Criteria The Museum should maintain appropriate controls over the compliance process to prevent or detect material misstatements in its schedule of expenditures of federal awards ("SEFA"). In addition, management should review monthly and year-end financial activity to determine if there are any unusual balances that need to be investigated to ensure the completeness and accuracy of the SEFA. Condition During the audit, an error within the SEFA was discovered which required an adjustment to properly state the SEFA. Context The omitted amounts on the SEFA primarily related to a federal grant which was not communicated from the development department to the finance department. Although the associated expenditures were properly recorded in the Museum's financial records, the lack of internal communication resulted in the grant being inadvertently excluded from the SEFA. Cause The limited number of staff within the development and finance departments restricted the Museum's ability to perform the necessary review of the SEFA. Effect This could lead to inaccurate information and reporting compliance for which the Museum's decisions are made upon. Questioned costs None. Identification of a repeat finding This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation We recommend the Museum review and enhance its internal controls and process to ensure the completeness of the SEFA. This should include cross-departmental coordination, particularly between the development and finance departments, to identify all federal funding sources and related expenditures. A checklist or reconciliation procedure should be established to verify that all applicable grants are included and properly reported. Views of responsible officials The National Building Museum has established policies and internal controls to ensure the completeness and accuracy of grant reporting. However, in consideration of the SEFA findings, we will strengthen our processes specific to federal grants. We will enhance cross-departmental coordination between the Development and Finance departments to ensure all federal awards are properly identified and reported. Additionally, we will integrate the SEFA review into our regular grant reporting and performance monitoring procedures. As part of this effort, we enhanced the current reconciliation process and added a SEFA-specific process to support complete and accurate reporting. These improvements will be implemented in advance of the next reporting cycle to ensure compliance and prevent recurrence.
Finding 2024-002: Procurement – Material Weakness Federal Agency: Institute of Museum and Library Services Federal Program Titles: Museums for America Federal Assistance Listing Number: 45.301 Compliance Requirement: Procurement Criteria Under Uniform Guidance, non-federal entities must justify the use of sole source procurement through appropriate documentation. This includes providing a clear rationale for selecting a sole source vendor, conducting and documenting market research to confirm that the product or service is available only from a single source, and obtaining the necessary approvals as required by the recipient's internal procurement policies. Condition We noted several instances of procurement purchases deemed to be sole source that did not adhere to the established procurement requirements. Specifically, required contemporaneous written internal support for sole source awards were either incomplete or not retained. Context The Museum was unable to provide sufficient written documentation to support the justification for sole source vendor selections. Cause The Museum's internal controls to ensure that procurement procedures, particularly those related to sole source procurements, were not effectively implemented. Effect The Museum may inadvertently engage vendors through procurement processes without written documentation of sole sourcing. This could lead to reduced accountability and potential disallowance of federal expenditures. Questioned costs None. Identification of a repeat finding This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation The Museum should review and enhance its procurement procedures and provide periodic staff training to ensure compliance with the Uniform Guidance. This includes clearly defining and enforcing documentation requirements for all procurement types, particularly sole source procurements. Additionally, implementing a standardized procurement checklist and approval workflow will help ensure proper justification, competitive solicitation when required, and appropriate documentation retention. Periodic reviews of procurement activities should also be conducted to verify ongoing compliance and to identify and address any procedural gaps. Views of responsible officials The National Building Museum's existing written procurement policy strives to adhere to all applicable federal regulations and guidelines. In excuting this grant, the Museum selected sole source contracts whose expertise aligned specifically with the project's objectives. The Museum provided regualr updates to the granting agency, the institute of Museum and Library Services (IMLS), which was informed of and verbally agreed to the Museum's intent and justification for sole sourcing. The Museum was awaiting a written acknologement when the agency was disbanded on March 31, 2025.
Finding 2024-001: Completeness of Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards – Material Weakness Federal Agency: Institute of Museum and Library Services Federal Program Title: Museums for America Federal Assistance Listing Number: 45.301 Compliance Requirement: Reporting Criteria The Museum should maintain appropriate controls over the compliance process to prevent or detect material misstatements in its schedule of expenditures of federal awards ("SEFA"). In addition, management should review monthly and year-end financial activity to determine if there are any unusual balances that need to be investigated to ensure the completeness and accuracy of the SEFA. Condition During the audit, an error within the SEFA was discovered which required an adjustment to properly state the SEFA. Context The omitted amounts on the SEFA primarily related to a federal grant which was not communicated from the development department to the finance department. Although the associated expenditures were properly recorded in the Museum's financial records, the lack of internal communication resulted in the grant being inadvertently excluded from the SEFA. Cause The limited number of staff within the development and finance departments restricted the Museum's ability to perform the necessary review of the SEFA. Effect This could lead to inaccurate information and reporting compliance for which the Museum's decisions are made upon. Questioned costs None. Identification of a repeat finding This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation We recommend the Museum review and enhance its internal controls and process to ensure the completeness of the SEFA. This should include cross-departmental coordination, particularly between the development and finance departments, to identify all federal funding sources and related expenditures. A checklist or reconciliation procedure should be established to verify that all applicable grants are included and properly reported. Views of responsible officials The National Building Museum has established policies and internal controls to ensure the completeness and accuracy of grant reporting. However, in consideration of the SEFA findings, we will strengthen our processes specific to federal grants. We will enhance cross-departmental coordination between the Development and Finance departments to ensure all federal awards are properly identified and reported. Additionally, we will integrate the SEFA review into our regular grant reporting and performance monitoring procedures. As part of this effort, we enhanced the current reconciliation process and added a SEFA-specific process to support complete and accurate reporting. These improvements will be implemented in advance of the next reporting cycle to ensure compliance and prevent recurrence.
Finding 2024-002: Procurement – Material Weakness Federal Agency: Institute of Museum and Library Services Federal Program Titles: Museums for America Federal Assistance Listing Number: 45.301 Compliance Requirement: Procurement Criteria Under Uniform Guidance, non-federal entities must justify the use of sole source procurement through appropriate documentation. This includes providing a clear rationale for selecting a sole source vendor, conducting and documenting market research to confirm that the product or service is available only from a single source, and obtaining the necessary approvals as required by the recipient's internal procurement policies. Condition We noted several instances of procurement purchases deemed to be sole source that did not adhere to the established procurement requirements. Specifically, required contemporaneous written internal support for sole source awards were either incomplete or not retained. Context The Museum was unable to provide sufficient written documentation to support the justification for sole source vendor selections. Cause The Museum's internal controls to ensure that procurement procedures, particularly those related to sole source procurements, were not effectively implemented. Effect The Museum may inadvertently engage vendors through procurement processes without written documentation of sole sourcing. This could lead to reduced accountability and potential disallowance of federal expenditures. Questioned costs None. Identification of a repeat finding This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation The Museum should review and enhance its procurement procedures and provide periodic staff training to ensure compliance with the Uniform Guidance. This includes clearly defining and enforcing documentation requirements for all procurement types, particularly sole source procurements. Additionally, implementing a standardized procurement checklist and approval workflow will help ensure proper justification, competitive solicitation when required, and appropriate documentation retention. Periodic reviews of procurement activities should also be conducted to verify ongoing compliance and to identify and address any procedural gaps. Views of responsible officials The National Building Museum's existing written procurement policy strives to adhere to all applicable federal regulations and guidelines. In excuting this grant, the Museum selected sole source contracts whose expertise aligned specifically with the project's objectives. The Museum provided regualr updates to the granting agency, the institute of Museum and Library Services (IMLS), which was informed of and verbally agreed to the Museum's intent and justification for sole sourcing. The Museum was awaiting a written acknologement when the agency was disbanded on March 31, 2025.